共查询到7条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
边境安全风险分析系统的构建研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
唐超 《中国人民武装警察部队学院学报》2014,(11):22-26
提出了信息化背景下边境安全风险情报分析的基本概念及其内涵,论述了信息化背景下边境安全风险分析系统的架构和面向边境安全风险分析的信息组织方式。 相似文献
2.
吕海峰 《中国人民武装警察部队学院学报》2010,26(7):79-80
深入研究、切实抓好预算执行审计工作对于保证预算的落实、达到收支平衡,具有十分重要的现实意义。预算执行审计应围绕“三个监督”开展工作,并处理好“三方面关系”。 相似文献
3.
杨彦文 《中国人民武装警察部队学院学报》2011,(7):15-18
边防工作作为国防的重要组成部分,涉外性强,受周边安全形势影响大。当前,我国的边防工作既面·l盏着难得的发展机遇,同时更要直面各种挑战。分析周边安全环境对我国边防的影响,可以使我们更好地认清形势,趋利避害,抓住机遇,充分发挥职能作用,确保边防安全稳定。 相似文献
4.
岗位评价是人力资源管理中的重点技术之一,是解决组织内岗位间相对公平性的重要工具。采用工作要素评分法,对边防检查站中层领导岗位进行了岗位评价实例操作,确定了岗位能级系数,推导出绩效考评综合评价计算公式,为岗位评价技术在边防部队干部量化考评中的应用提供了参考依据。 相似文献
5.
蔡红雷 《中国人民武装警察部队学院学报》2007,23(1):78-82
考试是提高教学质量和学员综合素质的重要教学环节。按照素质教育要求,武警学院目前考试模式仍存在很多问题和不足。根据军校特点,考试改革应遵循全面性、科学性、灵活性等原则,构建科学合理的考试模式。军校应不断更新教育思想和观念,进一步突出学员的主体性,充分发挥考试对教学的反馈、评价和促进作用。 相似文献
6.
The origins of the cancellation of Canada's Avro CF-105 arrow fighter program: A failure of strategy
The story of the demise of Canada's remarkable CF-105 Arrow jet-fighter interceptor has been told and retold by numerous Canadian writers. As told by most, it is a tragic tale. Canadian Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, in an act as unforgivable as it was incomprehensible, not only destroyed a highly promising all-Canadian state-of-the-art aircraft but ruined all hopes of Canada ever being an important player in the North American defense industry. This article offers a contrasting interpretation — locating the problems leading to the aircraft's cancellation further back in history, and in particular in serious and determinative failures in strategic thinking and analysis by senior Canadian military officials at the time of the Arrow program's birth in 1953. 相似文献
7.
Louise Stanton 《Defense & Security Analysis》2012,28(4):288-302
Countries with a federalist system of government have different arrangements for providing national security. US national security is provided by national and State defense forces. The quintessential national function – national defense – experienced some changes that enhanced the role of the States. Policy changes in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 (2008 NDAA) introduced new roles for the Governors and the State defense forces, or the National Guard. This article explores how the interests of Congress and States aligned in the 2008 NDAA such that the national defense function changed. This article finds that the national government continues to have the central coordinating role, but that the politics and provisions of the 2008 NDAA changed the national–State relationship in mission, decision-making, and command and control so that US federalism in the national defense function is evolving in unexpected ways. 相似文献