全信息图像质量评估研究的发展综述

随着图像技术的广泛应用,图像的质量评估问题,即信息的可靠性问题,在自动化系统中的地位日益重要。全信息图像质量评估是针对目标原始图像和被测图像都已知时的被测图像评估。从历史发展角度系统地回顾了20世纪60年代以来全信息图像质量评估研究的发展历程和现状,并从算法的构成角度对代表性的全信息图像质量评估算法进行了分类与分析。由于图像质量评估函数的性能测定在其研究中具有重要的地位,对于图像质量评估函数的性能测定方案给予了说明。最后,从研究的深入角度上讨论图像质量评估研究的未来发展趋势。     

空袭目标流威胁评估与排序模型研究

结合现代防空作战的特点和指挥自动化系统的工作过程,对影响目标威胁评估的各种因素进行了分析,利用模糊综合评价等理论和方法,给出了进行威胁评估的因素集和评价集,建立了相应的数学模型,叙述了进行威胁评估与排序的方法、步骤和一般准则.     

Assessing Capabilities in International Politics: Biased Overestimation and the Case of the Imaginary ‘Missile Gap’

How states assess the capabilities of their adversaries and rivals is of paramount importance to the theory and practice of international relations. This paper presents a framework for understanding why states overestimate the capabilities of their adversaries. Three types of overestimation are presented, consisting of conscious/rational, erroneous and biased overestimation. In order to demonstrate the phenomenon of biased overestimation in international politics, the case of the ‘Missile Gap’ (1957–61) controversy in the United States is examined.     

战场信息共享等级及评价

以信息共享为核心的作战系统集成(Integration of Operational System:IOS),可适应未来高技术条件下联合作战样式的需要.根据IOS中作战系统间的战场信息可访问、可交互、可分析及可操作的程度,将战场信息共享等级(Levels of War-Field Information Sharing:LIS)划分成四级(隔离级、连通级、分布级、集成级),给出了IOS和LIS相关概念的定义.最后,阐述了面向IOS的LIS评价过程.     

The art of net assessment and uncovering foreign military innovations: Learning from Andrew W. Marshall’s legacy

ABSTRACT

Andrew W. Marshall, who shaped the way in which contemporary international security experts think about strategy, has been mostly associated with the invention of net assessment. The intellectual sources of this analytical technique, and of the related competitive strategies concept, could be traced to Marshall’s efforts to uncover Soviet post-World War II defense transformations. This article outlines the essence of these Soviet innovations – the empirical frame of reference that inspired Marshall. It provides a new perspective on the history of the net-assessment methodology, advances the debate within strategic studies over the nature of military innovations, and offers insights for experts examining defense transformations worldwide.