试析世博安保中的军事“软实力”运用

世博会的圆满召开,不仅需要强大的军事“硬实力”作后盾,也需要军事“软实力”作支撑。本文从军事“软实力”的基本概念入手,将其分解为感化认同力、形象吸引力、心理威慑力等三个子要素;从各要素出发,以完成世博安保任务为着眼点,提出加强军事“软实力”的具体思路。     

以指挥车为中心的火灾现场图像传输系统

火灾事故现场指挥不畅 ,已成为制约消防部队完成灭火救援任务的重要因素之一 ,火灾现场图像传输系统的运用是一个重要的解决方案。论述微波火场图像传输系统的组成、原理 ,并用典型事例说明图像传输的作用。     

钢结构防火保护及防火涂料技术的应用

钢结构由于不耐火 ,火灾中极易发生倒塌 ,因而需要进行防火保护。目前广泛使用的保护方法是喷涂防火涂料 ,以提高钢结构的耐火极限 ,延缓其在火灾中强度的降低 ,为灭火和人员疏散争取时间。     

对提高思想教育实效性的思考

提高思想教育的实效是思想教育的终极目标。要增强思想教育的实效,必须提高思想教育者素质,增强思想教育的感召力;把握官兵接受心理,增强思想教育的接受力;创新思想教育方法,增强思想教育的助推力。     

超声波法检测火灾高温后钢筋混凝土强度

我国每年有大量钢筋混凝土结构的建筑过火,科学准确的评估火灾高温后构件和结构的残存强度,据此制定科学合理的修复加固方案对于减少火灾损失具有重要意义。简略介绍了国内外火灾高温后钢筋混凝土结构受损评估的方法,并以某工程火灾后的强度检测为实例,提出了用超声波法检测火灾高温后钢筋混凝土残存强度的可行性和检测时应注意的问题,根据对多起建筑火灾高温后钢筋混凝土构件检测波形的对比,提出了不同受损程度的钢筋混凝土构件所表现的不同特征的波形。     

Estimating non‐transparent military expenditures: The case of china (PRC)∗

Data limitations arising from non‐transparency in military expenditure reporting impose significant constraints on economists studying country and comparative developments in this field. This article focuses on the case of China. It reviews the recent literature on China's military expenditure, examines the variance in published estimates, and identifies three factors which help explain the variance: budgetary falsification; non‐budgeted PLA revenue; and the US dollar purchasing‐power parity of the yuan. Conclusions emphasize important policy implications of such variance and suggest a more active role for defence economists in a field of research generating considerable attention from international relations scholars.     

船用核动力装置可靠性与安全性分析的关系探讨

以船用核动力装置为对象,探讨其可靠性与安全性分析的发展及现状,对二者关系进行分析,从概念、方法和工程背景角度提出作者的观点.     

复合导线高电导特性的机理分析

分析了复合导线在一定的频域,其导电性能优于铜导线的高电导特性的物理实质.认为,这种特性是由于电磁波在导线内部界面上的反射引起的.     

RELIABLE ENERGY SUPPLY AND NONPROLIFERATION

The phenomenon of global warming has led to a revival of the prospects for increased nuclear energy production worldwide, yet such increased production carries with it the increased risk of proliferation. To mitigate this risk, various multinational arrangements have been proposed to provide reliable supply of nuclear fuel while at the same time discouraging the construction of national plants for nuclear enrichment and reprocessing. This article provides a brief history of some of these proposals and concludes that the likelihood of success for such schemes as effective tools for nonproliferation is not high at this time. A proposal from the World Council on Renewable Energy to expand the understanding of supplier obligations under Article IV of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) to include the development of non-nuclear energy technologies for NPT parties in good standing is potentially a much better nonproliferation tool. Such an approach tracks the ideas contained in Title V of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, which has recently received revived congressional interest.     

NONPROLIFERATION POLICY CROSSROADS:

On October 1, 2008, Congress enacted a proposal that originated with President George W. Bush in 2005 to approve an unprecedented nuclear trade pact with India by removing a central pillar of US nonproliferation policy. Despite the numerous political challenges confronting the Bush administration, the initiative won strong bipartisan support, including votes from Democratic Senators Joseph Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. The four-year struggle to pass the controversial US-India nuclear trade agreement offers an exceptionally valuable case study. It demonstrates a classic tradeoff between the pursuit of broad multilateral goals such as nuclear nonproliferation and advancement of a specific bilateral relationship. It reveals enduring fault lines in executive branch relations with Congress. It vividly portrays challenges confronting proponents of a strong nonproliferation regime. This article is based on an analysis of the negotiating record and congressional deliberations, including interviews with key participants. It assesses the lessons learned and focuses on three principal questions: how did the agreement seek to advance US national security interests?; what were the essential elements of the prolonged state-of-the-art lobbying campaign to win approval from skeptics in Congress?; and what are the agreement's actual benefits—and costs—to future US nonproliferation efforts?