Grammar but No Logic: Technique is Not Enough – A Response to Nagl and Burton

Abstract

In issue 33/1 of The Journal of Strategic Studies, John Nagl and Brian Burton were provided with the opportunity to respond to the observations we made in our article, ‘Whose Hearts and Whose Minds? The Curious Case of Global Counter-Insurgency’, which appeared in the same issue. Nagl and Burton's reply, however, did not overtly address the points raised in our article, but instead offered a re-statement of the precepts of classical counter-insurgency (COIN). While we certainly recognise the value of counter-insurgency methods in conflicts such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan, Nagl and Burton's reply overlooks our original concerns about the limited utility of neo-counter-insurgency thinking outside these environments and the dangerous political implications it contains. They further ignore our core contention that a narrow preoccupation with theatre-specific technique has profound limitations when offered as a universal panacea to address complex transnational threats.     

Maximum matching in a convex bipartite graph

A special matching problem arising in industry is shown to be solvable by an algorithm of the form: match objects a_i and b_j if they satisfy a local optirnality criterion based on a ranking of currently unmatched objects. When no a_i and b_i remain that can be matched, the largest number of acceptable matches has been found.     

Book reviews

The Political Economy of Defense, Ross A. L. (ed), Greenwood Press, 1991, New York. pp. ix, 229; ISBN 0–313–26462–7, Price $47.95

Economie Politique de la Defense, Jacques Aben, (Paris: Editions Cujas, 1992, 170 pages, 120 French Francs, ISBN: 2–254–92723‐X)