| 定时截尾与序贯截尾可靠性试验方案分析比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘美玉,ZHANG Yong-qing,路靖.定时截尾与序贯截尾可靠性试验方案分析比较[J].装甲兵工程学院学报,2008,22(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘美玉 ZHANG Yong-qing 路靖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 总参谋部通信部驻北京地区军事代表室,北京,100049 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在生产方、使用方风险及MTBF值同等条件下,对定时截尾与序贯截尾2种试验方案的优缺点、基本原理和方法等进行了对比分析。定时截尾试验能够在事先确定最大累计工作时间及所消耗资源,但所需时间较长,试验成本较高,可应用于武器装备可靠性鉴定和验收试验;序贯截尾试验事先对试验总时间及试验所需用资源无法确定,只能根据事先拟定的接收、拒收条件结束试验,无法估计MTBF的真值,但是所需试验时间较短,费用相对较低,可用于武器装备可靠性验收试验,也可广泛运用于医学及其它科学试验领域。提出了选择可靠性试验方案的基本原则,为科学选择试验方案提供了依据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 定时截尾 序贯截尾 可靠性 试验方案 |
Comparison Between Sequential Truncation and Type-I Censoring for Reliability Statistical Testing Scheme |
| |
| LIU Mei-yu,ZHANG Yong-qing,LU Jing.Comparison Between Sequential Truncation and Type-I Censoring for Reliability Statistical Testing Scheme[J].Journal of Armored Force Engineering Institute,2008,22(3). |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Mei-yu ZHANG Yong-qing LU Jing |
| |
| Institution: | ( Military Representative Agent of Communication Department of General Staff Stationed Beijing Region; Beijing 100049; China); |
| |
| Abstract: | The schemes introduced in this paper are Type-I censoring and sequential truncation. Analysis and contrast between the two are conducted on condition of the same MTBF and risk for both manufacturer and consumer. Advantages and disadvantages of the two are drawn from experiments. The former can predicate maximum accumulated operational time and resources the inspection will cost, but it takes a little longer time and is expensive, thus it may go for reliability assessment and acceptance inspection for weapon... |
| |
| Keywords: | Type-I censoring truncation sequential truncation reliability statistical testing scheme |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
