首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

论政治先进的具体性历史性——兼谈财产多寡与政治先进和落后的相关性
引用本文:刘宏春.论政治先进的具体性历史性——兼谈财产多寡与政治先进和落后的相关性[J].中国人民武装警察部队学院学报,2003,19(1):6-9.
作者姓名:刘宏春
作者单位:武警学院部队管理系 河北廊坊065000
摘    要:判断人们政治上先进和落后的标准从来不是拥有财产的多少 ,而是是否代表新的生产力 ,是否促进生产力的发展和社会进步 ;社会的政治生活内容是多方面的 ,判断政治上先进和落后的标准是多样的、具体的 ;党的先进性同样是具体的、历史的 ,也不能简单地把有没有财产、有多少财产当作能否入党的前提标准 ,更不能作为唯一标准。

关 键 词:政治  先进  标准  具体性  历史性
文章编号:1008-2077(2003)01-0006-04
修稿时间:2002年12月17

The political progressiveness is specific and historical--On the correlation between the amount of property and political progressiveness or not
LIU Hong-chun.The political progressiveness is specific and historical--On the correlation between the amount of property and political progressiveness or not[J].Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy,2003,19(1):6-9.
Authors:LIU Hong-chun
Abstract:The criterion which we judge whether a person remains advanced in politics or not, is not the amount of property he or she possess, but those as follows: whether he or she can represent new productive forces, and whether he or she can promote the development of productive forces and progress of society. The political life in the society concerns aspects, thus the criterion to judge its progressiveness or backwardness is specific and multi-aspects. The frogressiveness of CPC is also specific and historic; therefore, we cannot simply use the amount of property he or she owns as the only standard to determine whether he or she can be recruited as the number of CPC.
Keywords:politics  progressiveness  criterion  specific  historical
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号