| 美国非法证据排除规则与德国证据运用禁止规则之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王建英.美国非法证据排除规则与德国证据运用禁止规则之比较[J].中国人民武装警察部队学院学报,2004,20(3):50-52. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王建英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武警学院基础部 河北廊坊065000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 非法获得的证据能否作为定案的依据 ,历来为各国刑事证据理论所关注。美国和德国作为英美法系和大陆法系的典型代表 ,分别确立了非法证据排除规则和证据运用禁止规则。研究了两国排除规则的内涵、发展历史、适用范围及存在差异
|
| 关 键 词： | 排除规则 证据运用禁止规则 毒树之果 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2077(2004)03-0050-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年1月27日 |
The comparative study of American exclusionary rule and Germany rule of evidentiary use prohibition |
| |
| WANG Jian-ying.The comparative study of American exclusionary rule and Germany rule of evidentiary use prohibition[J].Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy,2004,20(3):50-52. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Jian-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | It is always concerned whether the illegally obtained evidence can be used as the grounds of verdict. The United States and Germany, as the typical representatives of common law system and civil system, have established exclusionary rule and rule of evidentiary use prohibition one after onther. Comparative study will benefit the establishment of exclusionary rules in china in the aspect of the connotation of exclusionary rules, the development and the scope of exclusionary rules, and the difference between them. |
| |
| Keywords: | exclusionary rule rule of evidentiary use prohibition the fruit of the poisionous tree |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
