Estimation for dirichlet mixed models

Dirichlet mixed models find wide application. Estimation is usually achieved through the method of moments. Here we present an iterative hybrid algorithm for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimate employing both modified Newton-Raphson and E-M methods. This successful MLE algorithm enables calculation of a jack-knife MLE. Simulation comparison of the three estimates is provided. The MLE substantially improves upon the moments estimator particularly with increasing dimension. The jack-knife MLE in turn offers dramatic improvement over the MLE.     

Concise RLT forms of binary programs: A computational study of the quadratic knapsack problem

The reformulation‐linearization technique (RLT) is a methodology for constructing tight linear programming relaxations of mixed discrete problems. A key construct is the multiplication of “product factors” of the discrete variables with problem constraints to form polynomial restrictions, which are subsequently linearized. For special problem forms, the structure of these linearized constraints tends to suggest that certain classes may be more beneficial than others. We examine the usefulness of subsets of constraints for a family of 0–1 quadratic multidimensional knapsack programs and perform extensive computational tests on a classical special case known as the 0–1 quadratic knapsack problem. We consider RLT forms both with and without these inequalities, and their comparisons with linearizations derived from published methods. Interestingly, the computational results depend in part upon the commercial software used. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2010     

舰机时间协同对潜检查搜索样式

舰机一体化反潜是反潜作战最有效的形式,而舰机协同反潜搜索是其最重要的组成部分.从实际应用的角度出发,研究了舰机时间协同检查搜索样式,并给出了基于该样式的实际应用例子.     

CON/SLK due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two agents

We consider scheduling problems involving two agents (agents A and B), each having a set of jobs that compete for the use of a common machine to process their respective jobs. The due dates of the A‐jobs are decision variables, which are determined by using the common (CON) or slack (SLK) due date assignment methods. Each agent wants to minimize a certain performance criterion depending on the completion times of its jobs only. Under each due date assignment method, the criterion of agent A is always the same, namely an integrated criterion consisting of the due date assignment cost and the weighted number of tardy jobs. Several different criteria are considered for agent B, including the maxima of regular functions (associated with each job), the total (weighted) completion time, and the weighted number of tardy jobs. The overall objective is to minimize the performance criterion of agent A, while keeping the objective value of agent B no greater than a given limit. We analyze the computational complexity, and devise polynomial or pseudo‐polynomial dynamic programming algorithms for the considered problems. We also convert, if viable, any of the devised pseudopolynomial dynamic programming algorithms into a fully polynomial‐time approximation scheme. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 63: 416–429, 2016     

Confidence coefficient of approximate two-sided confidence intervals for the binomial probability

The confidence coefficient of a two-sided confidence interval for the binomial parameter p is the infimum of the coverage probability of the interval as p ranges between 0 and 1. The confidence coefficients for five different approximate confidence intervals are computed and compared to the confidence coefficient for the two-sided Clopper-Pearson confidence interval. Pratt's approximation method [10] yields virtually the same confidence coefficients as the Clopper-Pearson interval, and is easily computed without resorting to interative methods.     

Transportation problems with aggregated destinations when demands are uncertain

Transportation problems with uncertain demands are useful applied models themselves, and also they represent in a formal way the problem of estimating demands for use in deterministic models. We consider the effects of using a small, aggregate model of this type in place of a larger, more detailed one. Formulation of the aggregate objective function turns out to depend on how one chooses to use (disaggregate) the solution; several alternative methods are examined. Bounds are derived on the error induced by the approximation, thus facilitating comparison of alternative aggregations. We also consider the problem of estimating demands for an aggregate-level deterministic problem. In a specific sense, it is often not the case (as one might expect) that such aggregate demands are easier to estimate than the detailed demands. This is because aggregation and centralization are not the same thing.