首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   147篇
  免费   6篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   8篇
  2018年   5篇
  2017年   8篇
  2016年   6篇
  2015年   4篇
  2014年   9篇
  2013年   57篇
  2012年   3篇
  2010年   2篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   1篇
  2007年   1篇
  2004年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   2篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   3篇
  1997年   1篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   2篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   2篇
  1992年   3篇
  1990年   1篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   3篇
  1987年   2篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   2篇
  1984年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1978年   1篇
  1977年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1971年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1968年   1篇
  1967年   3篇
排序方式: 共有153条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
151.
ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the final years of South Africa’s nuclear-weapon program, particularly on the decision-making process leading up to the signature of the 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) by the South African government in 1991. In August 1988, after two decades of defiance, negotiations between the apartheid government and the NPT depository powers (the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Soviet Union) ensued at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna. Despite South Africa being the only state to give up its indigenously developed nuclear weapons and subsequently join the nonproliferation regime, little is known about how the national position on NPT accession and IAEA safeguards evolved. Research carried out in multiple archives using hitherto untapped primary sources and interviews with key actors from several countries show how domestic and regional political dynamics influenced Pretoria’s position on entering the nonproliferation regime. In the process, the F.W. de Klerk government managed to skillfully exploit international proliferation fears to advance its own agenda, thereby connecting South African NPT accession with that of the neighboring Frontline States coalition of Angola, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.  相似文献   
152.
ABSTRACT

For the first time in a generation, the US Navy finds itself in an era of great power competition. As US naval strategists and defense planners begin to organise materially and conceptually to confront the strategic and operational-level challenges posed by China and Russia, what should they keep in mind? What should frame their thinking? Absorbed with the day-to-day tasks associated with managing how the fleet is being built, operated, and rationalised, these busy officers and civilians seldom can step back and gain some perspective on fundamental aspects of the security environment and relate those to naval purpose. To that end, this article provides a primer on what to keep in mind and how to think in an era of maritime great power competition.  相似文献   
153.
Ilmari Käihkö 《Civil Wars》2019,21(2):179-199
ABSTRACT

This article investigates research brokers and commodification of information. When combined with inherently asymmetric research relationships and successful gatekeeping, brokers create demand and become indispensable. Potential negative effects of brokerage and commodification of information are discussed through experiences studying former combatants in Liberia. There bargains with brokers who could facilitate access to this hidden population resulted in a vicious circle as brokers confirmed what researchers wanted to hear. The attention to this issue was first brought by subsequent ethnography and participant observation, which also offer the promise of an ethically defensible way of collecting information.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号