基于灰色关联法的飞行模拟器方案评估

对三个飞行训练模拟器方案进行灰色关联评估。根据装备效能分析原则,结合飞行训练模拟器组成结构的自身特点,确定了影响飞行训练模拟器效能的主要指标,建立了飞行模拟器效能评估体系,应用层次分析法,计算出各指标的权重,再利用灰色理论原理,对效能体系中主要指标进行了灰色综合评估,然后把灰色综合评估值与费用结合,确定评估矩阵,按照灰色关联法的步骤,计算出各方案与理想方案的关联度。结果是比较符合实际情况的,并且应用到某型飞行模拟器方案论证中。     

物元贝叶斯网络模型研究

分析了贝叶斯网络建模过程中的缺陷,结合物元理论,提出了物元贝叶斯网络理论.该理论能够融合二者的优点,既可处理复杂系统中的不确定性,又能充分利用系统中的所有信息,因此能够更好地进行复杂系统评价.     

基于输入特性分析的光电跟踪内模控制设计

内模控制是一种基于对象教学模型进行控制器设计的新型控制策略,其设计思路是将对象模型与实际对象相并联,控制器逼近模型的动态逆.根据内模控制原理及光电跟踪系统参考输入及扰动输入特性,设计了一种新型位置控制器.并分析了IMC跟踪控制器的零稳念偏差及抗干扰性能.从仿真结果看,与常规PID控制相比,内模控制器参数调整简单、跟踪性能良好.特别是在针对目标突然机动的情况下.IMC控制器具有良好的稳态误差重构能力,即能迅速收敛到稳态误差.根据仿真结果数据统计,系统跟踪误差的均方根可减小到0.5 tarad,表明该控制器能够提高系统的跟踪精度,为高性能光电跟踪系统提供了一种新的控制策略.     

数字化部队作战能力评估指标体系

为加深对数字化部队作战能力的研究,完善数字化部队的编制体制,以系统科学与工程理论为指导,针对现代战争系统的四大要素对现代战争全过程进行分析,构建数字化部队战争系统模型分解图,将现代战争系统分解成部队与武器子系统、电子信息子系统、决策指挥子系统、后勤保障子系统.最后对各子系统的能力指标内涵及构成进行了详细的解释,并对其获取和度量方法进行了总结.     

灰色理论GRA模型在舰船生命力论证中的应用

运用灰色系统理论中的灰色关联分析法对舰船生命力进行了综合评判,建立了在不同设计方案中的优选模型,并以舰艇动力系统的设计为例,运用GRA对其进行优化选型。结果分析表明,此方法简单易行,结果准确可靠,可为系统设计方案的选优提供理论依据。     

空天防御作战规划问题研究

从技术与作战结合的角度,系统分析空天防御作战系统和对抗特点等问题,构建了"态势组态—目标排序—目标分配—冲突动态最优预测"新型作战规划方法,提出"博弈控制理论与方法",论述了空天防御作战规划方法论。对空天防御作战规划理论研究有一定参考价值,为发展空天防御作战规划系统提供了研究思路和技术支撑。     

辐射叶加载的短波宽带鞭状天线优化设计

提出一款具有多层辐射叶结构的新型鞭状天线,在10 m鞭状天线体上设置不同的辐射叶层数、半径、长度、分支数、仰角及其分布情况,研究其对天线辐射性能的影响,综合考虑选择一套最合适的辐射叶结构,并为天线进行双加载和宽带匹配网络的算法优化。仿真结果表明,与现有的普通宽带鞭状天线相比,增益和效率得到了普遍提高,在低频段增益最高提高了3 dB,效率最高提高了5%;在高频段增益最高提高了5 dB,效率最高提高了35%,方向图上翘也得到了一定的抑制,为改善现有的宽带鞭状天线提供一种新的结构设计方法。     

基于前景理论和证据推理的混合型多属性决策方法

针对属性权重完全未知的混合型多属性决策问题,提出一种基于前景理论和证据推理的决策方法。通过直觉模糊数对精确数、区间数和语言变量3种混合型属性的决策信息进行统一,根据前景理论对决策信息进行转化;提出基于直觉模糊熵与相似度的属性可靠性评估方法,结合属性重要度确定属性权重;采用证据推理算法集结属性信息,得到方案的综合前景值,并以此进行方案排序。算例分析结果表明,所提方法具有较强的区分能力,能够有效降低决策结果的不确定性,对混合型多属性决策问题具有较好的适用性。     

The struggle of a Kantian power in a Lockean world – German leadership in security and defence policy

ABSTRACT

German security and defence policy has undergone substantial transformation. This transformation requires an unprecedented level of political leadership, suggesting that Germany needs to solve the dilemma of how to supply leadership to increasingly demanding partners. What are the conditions under which German leadership can unfold in security and defence policy? To what degree do German role-conceptions of international agency and role-expectations of German leadership coincide? What kind of leadership outputs are produced? This study offers a comprehensive analysis of German security and defence policy in terms of supply (role conceptions) and demand (role expectations). We outline three leadership role conceptions present in the German strategic debate, which we then assess in the context of the Wendtian theory of cultures of anarchy. We then analyse Berlin's leadership in terms of outputs via the case study on Anchor Army and the Framework Nations Concept. We conclude that while Germany has tried to match leadership role expectations both rhetorically and in action, Berlin's leadership inputs have so far been insufficient. This has led to an imbalance in terms of role conceptions and expectations hampering effective German leadership in security and defence policy.     

Moving Beyond Population-Centric vs. Enemy-Centric Counterinsurgency

Historically, insurgency is one of the most prevalent forms of armed conflict and it is likely to remain common in the foreseeable future. Recent experiences with counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan offer many lessons for future counterinsurgents, but the discourse on the subject continues to be mired in a traditional dichotomy pitting population-centric approaches to counterinsurgency against enemy-centric approaches. Historical analysis suggests that this traditional dichotomy is not a sufficiently nuanced way to understand or plan for such operations. Instead, discussions of counterinsurgency should focus on two dimensions: actions (use of physical force vs. political or moral actions) and targets (active insurgents vs. insurgent support). This perspective divides the space of possible counterinsurgency efforts into four quadrants, suggesting that effective counterinsurgency campaigns find a balance of effort across the four quadrants that is well matched to the specific context.