全文获取类型
收费全文 | 203篇 |
免费 | 33篇 |
国内免费 | 18篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 1篇 |
2022年 | 1篇 |
2021年 | 2篇 |
2020年 | 4篇 |
2019年 | 6篇 |
2018年 | 3篇 |
2017年 | 7篇 |
2016年 | 2篇 |
2015年 | 5篇 |
2014年 | 19篇 |
2013年 | 53篇 |
2012年 | 11篇 |
2011年 | 11篇 |
2010年 | 25篇 |
2009年 | 11篇 |
2008年 | 13篇 |
2007年 | 20篇 |
2006年 | 5篇 |
2005年 | 8篇 |
2004年 | 9篇 |
2003年 | 7篇 |
2002年 | 6篇 |
2001年 | 8篇 |
2000年 | 4篇 |
1999年 | 3篇 |
1998年 | 4篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有254条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
251.
252.
253.
ABSTRACTThe making of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) has put Austria and its involvement in nuclear disarmament in the spotlight. This study highlights several factors that led Austria to become a prominent voice in nuclear-disarmament debates. First, its involvement dovetails with the emphasis on humanitarian disarmament it has promoted since the 1990s. Second, a strong antinuclear identity pervades Austrian society. This “nuclear allergy” combines antimilitarism inherited from the Cold War and, more broadly, an aversion to nuclear power, including for energy purposes. These two considerations form the background to the increased activism of the Austrian Foreign Ministry on nuclear disarmament in international fora. But, equally, Austria’s crusade for the TPNW can be attributed to the engagement of a small team of diplomats implementing personal as well as national preferences in favor of disarmament. 相似文献
254.
Robin Möser 《The Nonproliferation Review》2019,26(5-6):559-573
ABSTRACTThis article focuses on the final years of South Africa’s nuclear-weapon program, particularly on the decision-making process leading up to the signature of the 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) by the South African government in 1991. In August 1988, after two decades of defiance, negotiations between the apartheid government and the NPT depository powers (the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Soviet Union) ensued at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna. Despite South Africa being the only state to give up its indigenously developed nuclear weapons and subsequently join the nonproliferation regime, little is known about how the national position on NPT accession and IAEA safeguards evolved. Research carried out in multiple archives using hitherto untapped primary sources and interviews with key actors from several countries show how domestic and regional political dynamics influenced Pretoria’s position on entering the nonproliferation regime. In the process, the F.W. de Klerk government managed to skillfully exploit international proliferation fears to advance its own agenda, thereby connecting South African NPT accession with that of the neighboring Frontline States coalition of Angola, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. 相似文献