并行工程中过程重组与团队技术的应用

在分析复杂结构件设计、制造串行工作流程的基础上,给出了重组后的并行工作流程,简要介绍了团队技术的基本思想,描述了过程重组、团队技术在产品开发中的初步应用。提出过程重组和团队技术是改进设计思想和方法的有效方式,是缩短产品开发周期,提高产品设计质量,降低产品成本的重要手段之一。     

抗击军用无人机问题研究

由于军用无人机的突出优点及其在近期局部战争中的杰出表现,许多军事强国将无人机作为主要空袭平台而置于优先发展的地位,现代防空面临来自无人机的严峻挑战.在分析无人机特点及反无人机面临困难的基础上,提出了抗击无人机的主要战术技术措施.     

多属性决策(MADM)在防空C~3I系统效能评估中的应用研究

介绍了防空C3I系统效能的定义及效能评估的一般处理过程。通过专家群组决策确定效能指标体系 ,针对效能指标的多样性 ,提出了基于多属性决策 (MADM )的效能评估方法 ,并通过一个示例给出MADM方法的处理过程 ,有效地解决了防空C3I系统效能评估这一复杂而困难的问题。     

用相位梯度法校正超宽带雷达系统的相位误差

线性调频 (LFM)信号体制的超宽带雷达 (UWBR)系统的相位误差 ,会影响雷达系统脉冲压缩的结果。本文提出的相位梯度 (PG)算法 ,能够有效地估计系统相位误差 ,改善脉冲压缩的性能。     

两点源干扰情况下数据积累点数对雷达测角精度的影响

两点源干扰是干扰被动雷达导引头 (PRS)的有效手段。但在实际应用中 ,两点源的功率不可能完全相等 ,这就为PRS对抗两点源的干扰提供了契机。通过理论分析和仿真实验证明 ,当两点源偏离导引头的电轴方向不大的情况下 ,只要保证足够的积累点数 ,导引头进行数据积累取均值 ,其结果并不指向两源的“重心”或“质心”而是指向两源中功率较大者 ,并给出了确定积累点数的解析表达式     

BTT控制系统半实物仿真方案 设计及试验结果分析

BTT控制系统半实物仿真试验以BTT试验器为背景,配合BTT控制技术研究可全面验证导弹控制系统设计。给出了半实物仿真试验方案、方法及试验结果分析,试验结果表明BTT控制系统设计满足最小侧滑(近似零侧滑角)倾斜转弯的技术指标要求,半实物仿真试验方法正确。     

光纤光栅反射率及相位响应的计算

采用分层介质膜的等效模型 ,计算了均匀光纤光栅及线性啁啾光栅的反射谱、透射谱及反射相位跃变 ,结果与采用耦合模理论计算的结果相吻合 ,表明这是分析光纤光栅的光反射特性的一种有效的新方法 .     

去调频处理中空变相位误差补偿方法

调频连续波具有较长的脉宽和较大的信号带宽,通常采用去调频的处理方式,但是,去调频的处理会引入空变的相位误差。从去调频的处理方式入手,根据发射信号相位误差缓变的特点,提出了依据发射信号相位误差模型补偿空变相位误差的方法,并在理论上对该方法进行了推导。该补偿方法分为两步,从差频信号中去除发射信号相位误差,在残余视频相位误差校正之后,通过与补偿函数相乘去除剩余的相位误差。仿真和实测的实验结果表明,该方法能够克服目标距离的限制,有效地补偿空变相位误差带来的影响,提高脉压水平。提出的误差补偿方法能够很好地平衡系统负载、误差补偿精度和算法开销,具有较强实用性。     

Effectiveness of (R,Q) policies in one‐warehouse multiretailer systems with deterministic demand and backlogging

Consider a distribution system with a central warehouse and multiple retailers. Customer demand arrives at each of the retailers continuously at a constant rate. The retailers replenish their inventories from the warehouse which in turn orders from an outside supplier with unlimited stock. There are economies of scale in replenishing the inventories at both the warehouse and the retail level. Stockouts at the retailers are backlogged. The system incurs holding and backorder costs. The objective is to minimize the long‐run average total cost in the system. This paper studies the cost effectiveness of (R, Q) policies in the above system. Under an (R, Q) policy, each facility orders a fixed quantity Q from its supplier every time its inventory position reaches a reorder point R. It is shown that (R, Q) policies are at least 76% effective. Numerical examples are provided to further illustrate the cost effectiveness of (R, Q) policies. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 47: 422–439, 2000     

Optimal policies for M/M/m queue with two different kinds of (N,T)‐policies

In this paper, two different kinds of (N, T)‐policies for an M/M/m queueing system are studied. The system operates only intermittently and is shut down when no customers are present any more. A fixed setup cost of K > 0 is incurred each time the system is reopened. Also, a holding cost of h > 0 per unit time is incurred for each customer present. The two (N, T)‐policies studied for this queueing system with cost structures are as follows: (1) The system is reactivated as soon as N customers are present or the waiting time of the leading customer reaches a predefined time T, and (2) the system is reactivated as soon as N customers are present or the time units after the end of the last busy period reaches a predefined time T. The equations satisfied by the optimal policy (N*, T*) for minimizing the long‐run average cost per unit time in both cases are obtained. Particularly, we obtain the explicit optimal joint policy (N*, T*) and optimal objective value for the case of a single server, the explicit optimal policy N* and optimal objective value for the case of multiple servers when only predefined customers number N is measured, and the explicit optimal policy T* and optimal objective value for the case of multiple servers when only predefined time units T is measured, respectively. These results partly extend (1) the classic N or T policy to a more practical (N, T)‐policy and (2) the conclusions obtained for single server system to a system consisting of m (m ≥ 1) servers. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 47: 240–258, 2000