基于支持向量机的威胁判断模型

目标威胁判断是防空作战中一项重要内容,在建立目标威胁模型时,首先要挑选特征参数,分析了影响威胁度的若干因素.这里采用Rough理论中知识约简方法选择目标的特征参数;支持向量机是一类新型机器学习方法,由于其出色的学习能力,该技术已成为当前国际机器学习界的研究热点,利用支持向量机建立了威胁判断模型,给出了实例和解决此问题的支持向量机源程序.通过实例与神经网络法的结果进行了比较,结果表明支持向量机比较精确和简单.     

基于Lanchester方程的威胁评估模型

将描述对抗损耗的Lanchester方程应用于数据融合系统的威胁评估层次,从宏观角度分析了多传感器系统在作战中跟踪目标的模式,建立了相应模式下的Lanchester对抗损耗微分方程,以用于分析对抗交互双方的动态损耗,从而可根据态势作出威胁评估。     

战场态势估计和威胁估计

描述了战场态势、态势估计和威胁估计的概念。对态势估计从态势要素提取、态势评估推理及态势预测三方面进行了分析,重点对态势评估中的功能领域如:目标合并、协同关系推理、战场主动权指数计算、作战能力评估、重要目标估计及敌战斗序列估计等的含义、内容和实现步骤进行详细阐述。对威胁估计的内容和主要功能也进行了描述。     

Flexible capacity strategy in an asymmetric oligopoly market with competition and demand uncertainty

This article studies flexible capacity strategy (FCS) under oligopoly competition with uncertain demand. Each firm utilizes either the FCS or inflexible capacity strategy (IFCS). Flexible firms can postpone their productions until observing the actual demand, whereas inflexible firms cannot. We formulate a new asymmetrical oligopoly model for the problem, and obtain capacity and production decisions of the firms at Nash equilibrium. It is interesting to verify that cross‐group competition determines the capacity allocation between the two groups of firms, while intergroup competition determines the market share within each group. Moreover, we show that the two strategies coexist among firms only when cost differentiation is medium. Counterintuitively, flexible firms benefit from increasing production cost when the inflexible competition intensity is sufficiently high. This is because of retreat of inflexible firms, flexibility effect, and the corresponding high price. We identify conditions under which FCS is superior than IFCS. We also demonstrate that flexible firms benefit from increasing demand uncertainty. However, when demand variance is not very large, flexible firms may be disadvantaged. We further investigate the effects of cross‐group and intergroup competition on individual performance of the firms. We show that as flexible competition intensity increases, inflexible firms are mainly affected by the cross‐group competition first and then by the intergroup competition, whereas flexible firms are mainly affected by the intergroup competition. Finally, we examine endogenous flexibility and identify its three drivers: cost parameters, cross‐group competition, and intergroup competition. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 117–138, 2017     

基于决策树的空中目标威胁分类研究

将决策树ID3算法应用到空中目标威胁程度分类问题。分析了现有威胁评估的常用方法及其局限性,论述了ID3算法在此问题上的适用性。以28批典型目标的威胁程度为例,对数据进行概化处理后,利用weka平台进行仿真,构造决策树,并从中挖掘出隐含的24条规则,这对决策支持系统知识库的构建是非常必要的,也为指挥员定下作战决心提供重要参考。     

The socialization of military power: security cooperation and doctrine development through multinational military exercises

Multinational Military Exercises (MMEs) are often viewed by states as opportunities to increase interoperability, improve cooperation, and solve common security problems. We argue that in addition to this, MMEs work as tools to shape the shared beliefs of coalition partners surrounding threat. Specifically, MMEs allow multinational forces to identify best practices, consolidate beliefs, and codify behavior through doctrine, typically by means of some institutional process. We examine our argument on MMEs through an analysis of various multinational and coalition partner efforts to identify security threats and cooperate through the development of common doctrine at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of warfare. Our analysis suggests that the use of MMEs for doctrine development does help to socialize states in terms of identifying common threats and subsequently sharing a process by which to address them.     

信息时代陆军谋求非对称优势作战的制胜机理探析

非对称作战优势是信息时代陆军作战谋求制胜的关键所在,对创新陆军作战理论和提高军种制胜能力有着至关重要的作用。其制胜的机理主要包括基于体系支撑,谋求非对称势差优势;基于信息主导,谋求非对称控制优势;基于联动释能,谋求非对称毁歼优势。     

At war with social theory: Instrumental and communicative action in US military doctrine during the War on Terror

As US counterinsurgency campaigns draw to a close, doctrine for asymmetric warfare written during the War on Terror has come under heavy criticism. While many have argued that this shift to ‘winning hearts and minds’ is evidence that the United States is taking humanitarianism and nation-building seriously, others argue that a wide gap exists between US counterinsurgency doctrine and the protection of civilians afflicted by conflict. In this article, I show that the latter is true by comparing theories of instrumental and communicative action to US doctrine for operational design, stability operations, and counterinsurgency. I argue that these texts treat the people as an object to be manipulated for the achievement of pre-determined self-interested strategic goals rather than members of a community that jointly designs operations to fulfill shared objectives. However, US doctrine does contain communicative elements that, if prioritized, would better support humanitarian and state-building objectives otherwise subordinated in the War on Terror.     

坦克火力运用智能系统目标威胁度评估模块

随着科学技术的发展,未来战争将有更多的智能化武器出现,坦克火力运用智能化将是坦克火力系统的发展方向,而目标威胁度评估是该系统的核心模块.应用BP神经网络建立了坦克目标威胁度评估模型,对影响因素进行了分析与预处理,并构造了3组训练样本.利用MATLAB7.0中神经网络工具箱的图形用户界面GUI对样本和影响因素进行训练、仿真.结果表明,BP神经网络模型能很好地解决坦克目标威胁程度与影响因素之间的非线性关系,评估坦克目标威胁度有很强的客观性和科学性,对未来坦克火力运用智能系统的建设具有一定的借鉴作用.     

Pakistan’s nuclear weapons: how safe is safe enough? Transparency versus opacity

Due to expanding and increasing religious extremism and terrorism coupled with political instability in Pakistan, most western observers believe that Pakistan's nuclear weapons are not secure and could be taken over by terrorists. This would have adverse implications for the region and for global peace, especially for the security of USA and Europe. This article argues that this perception is based on a flawed understanding and knowledge of how Pakistan's command and control setup has evolved and operates. Pakistan's nuclear weapons are as safe as any other state's nuclear weapons. Pakistan has also been active in supporting and participating in global efforts to improve nuclear safety and security. Over the years, Pakistan has been quite open in sharing information regarding how it is improving its command and control system with western governments as well as scholars. This article argues that the steps Pakistan has taken to secure its nuclear weapons are adequate and that Pakistan would continue to further strengthen these measures; however, it is the expanding religious extremism, terrorism and anti-Americanism in the country which make the international perception of Pakistan extremely negative and then seep into the perception of Pakistan's nuclear weapons safety and security.