Zodiac算法新的不可能差分攻击

重新评估了Zodiac算法抵抗不可能差分攻击的能力。通过分析Zodiac算法的线性层,给出了Zodiac算法两条新的14轮不可能差分。利用新的不可能差分,结合Early-Abort技术对完整16轮的Zodiac算法进行了不可能差分攻击。攻击过程中一共恢复6个字节的密钥,其时间复杂度只有2_32.6次加密,数据复杂度约为2_85.6个明文,该攻击结果与已有最好的结果相比,时间复杂度降低了一个因子2₃₃。结果表明由于Zodiac算法线性层的扩散性差,使得该算法对不可能差分分析是不免疫的。     

Zodiac算法新的不可能差分攻击

#重新评估了Zodiac算法抵抗不可能差分攻击的能力。通过分析Zodiac算法的线性层,给出了Zodiac算法两条新的14轮不可能差分。利用新的不可能差分,结合Early-Abort技术对完整16轮的Zodiac算法进行了不可能差分攻击。攻击过程中一共恢复6个字节的密钥,其时间复杂度只有2_32.6次加密,数据复杂度约为2_85.6个明文,该攻击结果与已有最好的结果相比,时间复杂度降低了一个因子2₃₃。结果表明由于Zodiac算法线性层的扩散性差,使得该算法对不可能差分分析是不免疫的。     

Comparison between constant‐stress and step‐stress accelerated life tests under Time Constraint

By running life tests at higher stress levels than normal operating conditions, accelerated life testing (ALT) quickly yields information on the lifetime distribution of a test unit. The lifetime at the design stress is then estimated through extrapolation using a regression model. In constant‐stress testing, a unit is tested at a fixed stress level until failure or the termination time point of test, whereas step‐stress testing allows the experimenter to gradually increase the stress levels at some prefixed time points during the test. In this work, the optimal k‐level constant‐stress and step‐stress ALTs are compared for the exponential failure data under complete sampling and Type‐I censoring. The objective is to quantify the advantage of using the step‐stress testing relative to the constant‐stress one. Assuming a log‐linear life–stress relationship with the cumulative exposure model for the effect of changing stress in step‐stress testing, the optimal design points are determined under C/D/A‐optimality criteria. The efficiency of step‐stress testing to constant‐stress one is then discussed in terms of the ratio of optimal objective functions based on the information matrix. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 00: 000–000, 2013     

基于云模型空空导弹攻击区的拟合方法

利用云模型随机性和稳定性的特点,由Y条件云发生器生成交叉算子,基本云发生器产生变异算子,对传统遗传算法进行优化,提出一种基于云模型的遗传算法空空导弹可攻击区拟合的新方法。通过对某型空空导弹攻击区的拟合计算表明,该方法提高了攻击区的拟合精度,降低了拟合多项式系数的数量,减少了占用的计算机内存空间,拟合结果具有较好工程应用前景。     

LCDP SO算法在协同空战攻击决策中的运用?

为了探索提高协同空战攻击决策算法性能的途径,将多子群粒子群优化理论用于求解协同空战攻击决策,利用生命周期粒子群模型（ LCPSO）,提出了一种生命周期离散粒子群（ LCDPSO）协同空战攻击决策算法。基于典型空战想定背景,仿真验证了算法的有效性。通过统计实验的方法,分析比较了LCDPSO协同空战攻击决策算法与多种智能决策算法的准确性、可靠性和快速性,研究结果证明LCDPSO协同空战攻击决策算法优良的综合性能。     

CCRP(炸弹)对地攻击原理算法研究

本文在引入“计算航向”这一概念的基础上重新列出了CCRP对地攻击原理的计算公式。并由此计算出描述投放点相对本机位置的⊿K 与⊿t 两个量。⊿K 表示在当前的攻击条件下“计算航向”与实际航向之差,“计算航向”表示本机若在当前沿该航向按给定条件飞行,则经一定时间⊿t 后即可到达正确的投弹点。     

舰舰导弹攻击样式选择的决策分析

根据舰舰导弹攻击时使用雷达方式的不同,可将舰舰导弹攻击主要归结为三种样式,即其他兵力引导攻击样式、被动雷达攻击样式和主动雷达发波攻击样式。衡量各个攻击样式优劣主要考虑攻击的隐蔽性、命中率和发挥武器最大射程等三个因素。为此建立舰舰导弹攻击样式选择问题的递阶层次结构模型,从衡量各攻击样式优劣的三个主要因素出发,对模型进行了分析。最后得出了以其他兵力引导攻击为最佳攻击样式的结论。     

深度置信网络在导弹攻击区分类中的应用

针对传统导弹攻击区解算方法忽略双方态势变化等问题,提出运用深度置信网络的导弹攻击区分类模型。根据导弹命中情况与目标机动间的关系,将导弹攻击区划分为五类。通过分析影响导弹攻击结果的态势参数,构建导弹攻击结果预测模型。在实验部分,结合重构误差和测试错误率确定深度置信网络的网络结构,通过逐层提取数据法分析模型参数特征并且讨论微调数据的采样方式。使用反向传播神经网络和支持向量机进行分类有效性对比实验。实验结果表明：深度置信网络运行速度和预测准确度明显优于其他两种方法,满足实时性和准确性要求,所提方法具有良好的应用价值。     

Stage life testing

In progressive censoring, items are removed at certain times during the life test. Commonly, it is assumed that the removed items are used for further testing. In order to take into account information about these additional testing in inferential procedures, we propose a two‐step model of stage life testing with one fixed stage‐change time which incorporates information about both the removed items (further tested under different conditions) and those remaining in the current life test. We show that some marginal distributions in our model correspond either to progressive censoring with a fixed censoring time or to a simple‐step stress model. Furthermore, assuming a cumulative exposure model, we establish exact inferential results for the distribution parameters when the lifetimes are exponentially distributed. An extension to Weibull distributed lifetimes is also discussed.     

Mirror,mirror on the wall,who is the most offensive of them all? – Explaining the offensive bias in military tactical thinking

This article explores why the offensive predominates military tactical thinking. With survey results showing an offensive bias among 60 per cent of senior Swedish officers and as many as 80 per cent in the case of the army, it is clear that this is not just a problem of the past but is equally relevant today. The article asks why there is a tendency to perceive and understand offensive tactics as the preferred choice and the way to conduct battle that should be encouraged and preferred. Drawing on existing research and the findings of a pilot study, ten propositions for why the offensive bias exists are tested using a mixed-method approach. Based on the findings, the article develops a model to understand why the offensive dominates military tactical thinking. It is found that the two key constitutive factors behind the offensive bias are military culture and education. These factors most directly and profoundly influence an officer’s identity, perceptions, and thinking. Military culture and education, in turn, work as a prism for four other factors: military history, the theory and principles of war, doctrine and TTPs, and psychological factors.