基于协同进化的多平台联合对地观测优化调度

在分析了卫星与无人机在执行观测与资源调度上的特性差异基础上,建立了多平台联合对地观测调度问题的数学模型,提出了多平台协同进化调度算法(MPCCPSA)进行求解。MPCCPSA采用分层式协同进化架构解决了不同类型观测方案统一调度生成问题。根据不同类型平台使用特性以及观测目标集合特点,采用分治-合作策略将其分解分配到各平台,顶层的交叉、变异操作保证各种群的多样性,底层的分治、合作算子保证卫星与无人机之间保持观测能力动态互补,在确保可行解的前提下加快收敛速度。仿真实验表明该方法能够有效解决空-天基多类型平台联合观测优化调度问题。     

基于压缩感知原理的融合判别信息的协作表示方法

提出了一种用于视觉分类任务的低计算复杂度且有效的图像表示方法。把协作表示和判别信息结合在统一框架内,是基于协作表示分类方法的一种扩展形式。测试样本的协作表示系数是稀疏的,这种基于冗余和过完备的表示对于遮挡和伪装而言是鲁棒的;此外,通过最小化类内散布矩阵和最大化类间散布矩阵的判别信息的挖掘,对于视觉分类问题也是很有帮助的。在一些基准数据库上的实验表明,提出的方法相对于现有的方法而言能够获得更有竞争力的表现。     

基于进化算法的雷达对抗侦察无人机航路规划

雷达对抗侦察无人机在执行任务前要根据战场环境预先规划好最优路径。全面考虑战场环境威胁约束、机动性能约束和侦察任务约束,综合轮盘法、最优保存策略和6种进化算子形成进化算法,并对航路规划问题进行求解。仿真结果表明,利用约束量化方法和进化算法对雷达对抗侦察无人机进行航路规划是可行的。     

论我国高校协同创新的改进与完善

高校协同创新是指高校与科研机构、企业、政府之间,围绕国家重大科技项目和各行业关键技术,投入各自优势资源,合作攻关,力求取得重大突破的创新性活动。高校协同创新具备动态性、多元性、融合性、持续性的特点。要改进和完善我国高校协同创新,需要创建良好的协同创新组织方式、培养协同创新的思想观念、形成良好的创新型人才培养机制。     

单框架控制力矩陀螺部分失效时的空间站姿态机动方法

对金字塔构型单框架控制力矩陀螺(SGCMG)的失效特性进行分析。结合SGCMG部分失效的特点,构建运用Legendre伪谱法的重规划姿态机动路径求解方法。考虑SGCMG失效情况的不可预测性,设计自适应操纵律,该操纵律可以根据指令力矩与输出力矩的偏差对SGCMG的失效情况进行诊断,从而调节操纵律的内部参数,实现失效情况操纵律的自适应调节。仿真结果表明,采用姿态机动路径重规划算法与自适应操纵律,在控制力矩陀螺部分失效的情况下,仍可以实现空间站的大角度姿态机动。姿态机动方法可以有效应对空间站大角度姿态机动过程中可能出现的SGCMG部分失效情况,从而提高空间站姿态机动任务的安全性与可靠性。     

改进型Voronoi图和动态权值A*算法的无人机航迹规划

针对实际作战环境中的不同威胁等级和不同威胁实体的威胁源,提出了改进型的Voronoi图,并建立了基于改进型Voronoi图的航迹规划空间;基于A*算法的估价函数在不同阶段对指标的敏感度不同,在传统的启发式A*搜索算法基础上提出了动态权值A*搜索算法,提高了航迹搜索的效率,实现了航迹搜索过程快速性和准确性的结合。最后通过Matlab仿真计算出由动态权值A*算法得到的最优航迹,并进行了航迹的平滑处理,仿真表明了该方法的可行性。     

基于稀疏A*算法的微小卫星飞行姿态静环境规划

提高微小卫星的低可观测特性能够有效提升微小卫星的使用效率和生存能力,因此,设计了一种以稀疏A*算法(SAS)为基础的微小卫星低可观测飞行姿态静环境规划算法。通过对微小卫星的俯仰角,方位角和横滚角等姿态角进行调整,从而可以有效降低微小卫星在威胁雷达方向上的RCS值,提高微小卫星的低可观测特性。通过对工作频率在S波段和VHF波段的威胁雷达对微小卫星的威胁性进行仿真,结果显示规划后微小卫星的低可观测性能明显改善,满足飞行姿态规划的需求。     

SLOWING DOWN TO KEEP THE LEAD IN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY

We develop a model of military technology competition among states. States can choose to introduce new military technology, mimic rivals’ level of technology, or withdraw from the contest. States can choose to implement any level of technology within their current feasible technologies. We find that states with significant technological leads should sometimes withhold new technologies, only strategically releasing them to trump rivals’ efforts. We develop the model by refining Admiral Jackie Fisher’s roughly articulated concept of ‘plunging’. We then use this refined argument to reanalyze the case of naval rivalries among European powers between the Crimean War and the First World War. Finally, we conclude by discussing the model’s implications for current US military force structure planning.     

U.S. policy on preventive war and preemption

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001 and Hurricane Katrina, the United States government has spent tens of billions of dollars to improve the nation's ability to respond to a natural disaster or terrorist attack, but the emphasis on immediate first response has left many long-term environmental, political, and technological challenges unaddressed. Although a dirty bomb attack is unlikely to yield the same amount of physical devastation and death as caused by Katrina or a nuclear weapon, the social, psychological, and economic impact would be enormous. At present, however, the United States lacks the technology necessary to decontaminate a large, densely populated urban area under time, political, and economic constraints. This article reviews past cleanup experiences and current decontamination capabilities to consider the long-term implications of a dirty bomb, identifies weaknesses in America's existing response capabilities, notes possible areas of political friction, and considers the implications of the failure to adequately prepare. Having the appropriate decontamination techniques established and long-term plans in place before an incident occurs will significantly improve the government's ability to protect public and environmental security, establish a viable decontamination strategy, allow residents to return to their homes, and get the local economy back on its feet.     

Portfolio analysis for defense: taking account of networking

To manage their assets at an enterprise level, defense organizations have turned to portfolio theory for the planning, analysis and management of their military forces and materiel. Despite being well established in the commercial sector, the application of portfolio approaches in defense is problematic. The vexatious question for defense of how to define and measure benefits arising is complicated by the increased utility and effectiveness achieved through networking of military forces and the equipment they use. The authors discuss the challenges for defense in using a portfolio approach and propose a conceptual model for dealing with the effects arising from networking with information and communications technologies.