关于《非法证据排除规定》与刑事情报适格性的思考

根据刑事情报的诉讼价值体现与诉讼法律制度的联系,立足于公安边防刑事侦查工作实践,针对《非法证据排除规定》和《办理死刑案件证据规定》,就刑事情报与刑事证据的关系,证据适格性是情报转换证据的关键,《非法证据排除规定》中情报适格性解析几方面,对刑事情报的证据转换进行初步探讨。     

论消防监督检查的原则

消防监督检查原则对于规范和制约消防监督检查权的行使具有重要作用。然而,目前消防法律对消防监督检查的原则并没有明确规定,这对于监督和制约消防监督检查权的行使,保护被检查对象的合法权益十分不利。对消防监督检查必须遵循的原则进行了探讨,提出了五项原则,即依法检查原则、比例原则、服务性原则、相对人参与原则和救济原则。     

论现行法律框架下多种形式消防队伍的发展与管理

随着社会经济的飞速发展,消防保卫任务日趋繁重,但现有消防警力严重不足,如何在建设好公安消防现役队伍的同时,建立和发展多种形式消防队伍,提高全社会的灭火救援能力,已成为保障经济建设和社会稳定的当务之急．同时也是我国消防界急需解决的重要课题。从我国发展多种形式消防队伍的理论和实践依据入手,通过进一步分析目前我国多种形式消防队伍的组织形式和发展现状,指出了我国多种形式消防队伍法制建设方面存在的问题,并结合各地的具体实践展开了对多种形式消防队伍发展的一些思考。     

论失火罪和消防责任事故罪案件刑事证据的运用

正确运用刑事证据,是司法实践的重要内容,明确运用刑事证据的指导思想,掌握运用刑事证据的具体原则和步骤,才能把握法定证据和常见刑事案件的证据特点,才能在司法实践中充分认识并发挥证据在认定案件事实中的重要作用。     

开口电极在海水中的电场特性研究

利用稳恒电磁场理论,通过基本假设和单个电极电场计算公式的推导,计算了某一深度平面的电场值,绘制了平面分布图。接着利用相似理论进行了模型缩比实验,测量了二电极电场在某一平面上的分布值,绘制了平面分布图,进行了基本特性分析。该结果对进行船舶电场模拟和海缆断点探寻等工作,具有很好的参考价值。     

一种基于观测器的自修复飞行控制系统设计

故障检测与隔离(FDI)、控制律重构是自修复飞行控制系统设计的重要内容.在自修复飞行控制系统设计中,利用观测器,设计了针对传感器的故障进行检测的方法,可使检测效果在一定的条件下,对系统参数变化不敏感,具有较好的鲁棒性;此外,当飞机操纵机构发生故障时,利用观测器,设计了基于线性模型跟随控制进行飞行重构控制的方法,使得当状态变量不能测量时的控制系统得以物理实现.最后,给出了仿真实例,结果表明了该方法的可行性和有效性.     

Becoming a disarmament champion: the Austrian crusade against nuclear weapons

ABSTRACT

The making of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) has put Austria and its involvement in nuclear disarmament in the spotlight. This study highlights several factors that led Austria to become a prominent voice in nuclear-disarmament debates. First, its involvement dovetails with the emphasis on humanitarian disarmament it has promoted since the 1990s. Second, a strong antinuclear identity pervades Austrian society. This “nuclear allergy” combines antimilitarism inherited from the Cold War and, more broadly, an aversion to nuclear power, including for energy purposes. These two considerations form the background to the increased activism of the Austrian Foreign Ministry on nuclear disarmament in international fora. But, equally, Austria’s crusade for the TPNW can be attributed to the engagement of a small team of diplomats implementing personal as well as national preferences in favor of disarmament.     

Legitimate Authority as a Jus Ad Bellum Condition: Defense of a Procedural Requirement in Just War Theory

ABSTRACT

Today, it is widely held that while authorization may be helpful in assuring that the other jus ad bellum criteria are met, legitimate authority is not itself a condition for just recourse to war. Or, if it is necessary, it is said to be a trivial requirement, as mobilization for war requires some political authorization. Those who would retain the legitimacy requirement have differing views about who the proper authority is. I argue that, reasonably understood, legitimate authorization is necessary for jus ad bellum. Considerations of agency and consent in force combine with the social contract to commit us to deferring to recognized authorities. These obligations are strengthened by the epistemic reliability and pragmatic value conferred by governing institutions and procedures limiting recourse to war. These same rationales imply that the U.N. Security Council should regulate the international use of force. I qualify that if higher authorities fail to act, other subsidiary authorities may then authorize force. However, the move to each subsequent level of authorization must be justified. Understood in this way, the requirement that wars not be fought without legitimate authorization is a non-trivial, necessary procedural jus ad bellum condition.