基于D-S理论的多传感器空中目标识别

针对当前空中目标识别的特点,探讨基于D-S理论的多传感器空中目标识别方法.设计了一套多传感器空中目标识别算法.详细推导了该算法,对\"未知度\"的概念进行了扩充,让其涵盖了部分不可求的逆命题,并结合具体实例对其应用进行了验证和分析.分析表明,该算法能够较好地识别空中目标.灵活确定\"未知度\",适当扩充\"未知度\"的概念,可使一些复杂问题简单化,通过较少地运算达到预定效果.     

隧道防火涂料的研究进展与发展趋势

对隧道防火涂料的组成、工作原理、生产工艺流程及技术指标等作了简要阐述,并对近年来国内外隧道防火涂料研究中存在的问题及今后的发展方向进行了探讨与展望,认为隧道防火涂料既要满足隧道防火设计的要求,又要具有较高的性价比及环保性。     

舰炮武器系统服务概率模型

为更有效地评价舰炮武器系统的射击能力和武器效能,本文以排队论为基础,建立了由舰炮武器系统与目标组成的排队系统服务概率数学模型,为综合评价舰炮武器系统的射击能力和系统效能提供参考依据。     

Dynamic institutionalization: the foundations of Japan’s radioactive problem

Many have suggested that the true purpose behind Japan’s development of a closed nuclear-fuel cycle is to maintain the technical potential to develop nuclear weapons. However, closer examination of the development of Japan’s nuclear industry shows that, although Japan possesses advanced nuclear technologies, there has been no deliberate strategy to create a nuclear-weapon option. There is no “nuclear hedge.” To illustrate this point, this article presents a framework called “dynamic institutionalization” to explain the origins of Japan’s nuclear policies and the different sets of institutionalized pressures and constraints that have perpetuated these policies over time. Japan’s continued development of closed fuel-cycle technologies is primarily driven by domestic politics and the lack of a permanent spent-fuel management solution. On the other hand, Japan’s institutionalized nuclear forbearance is driven by the calculation that, as long as US extended deterrence remains credible, Japan’s security is best guaranteed through reliance on the US nuclear umbrella. By analytically untangling the policy of closed fuel-cycle development from the rationale for nuclear forbearance, this article provides a more nuanced view of the relationships between the domestic and international variables shaping Japan’s nuclear policies.     

Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments

The current combat motivation model based on primary group thesis assumes that the main force behind motivation is peer-bonding or otherwise known as unit cohesion. Cohesion is perceived as an all-encompassing factor that leads to satisfactory (or unsatisfactory in lack thereof) military effectiveness and performance in conflict environments. However, the article identifies three main problems with this perspective: 1. mono-dimensional view of motivation; 2. motivation based on heteronomy, and 3. self-reporting bias. The current model does not consider motivation as a separate entity from cohesion; it does not place motivation as fundamental human value; lastly, it takes motivation as granted by-product of socialization. The article proposes a new combat motivation model based on The Self-Determination Theory. The theory maintains that human motivation requires satisfaction of three psychological needs of competence, relatedness, and autonomy. The degree of satisfaction of those three needs leads to different types of regulated motivations – a continuum from intrinsic to extrinsic – each of which has specifiable consequences for learning, performance, and well-being of an individual.