自动武器可靠性寿命分布规律研究

本文对两种具有代表性的自动武器收集其生产验收寿命试验的故障记录,经处理得出寿命子样,再用皮尔逊检验进行分布函数检验,从中发现自动武器寿命分布服从指数分布,为研究自动武器可靠性指标及其验收方法提供了理论依据。     

雷达干扰资源一对多分配方法

在对雷达干扰资源分配的一般优化模型和求解算法进行分析的基础上,从提高资源利用效率的角度出发,提出了目标雷达分群思想,并建立了一种新的基于一对多策略的雷达干扰资源分配模型,通过对目标雷达群的一对一分配实现对单部雷达的一对多分配.最后,对该模型中一些关键性问题进行了探讨,如任务整合、新任务参数确定、任务优先级排序、干扰机位置部署以及单目标雷达群干扰效益评估等.     

基于筹措供应中心的装备器材保障研究

将先进的物流理论和供应链管理思想应用于装备器材保障中,阐述了建立装备器材筹措供应中心的重要性,构建了基于筹措供应中心的装备器材保障体系,设计了基于筹措供应中心的器材保障物流网络和器材保障信息管理,探讨了该模式下装备器材保障体系的运作机制,从而实现了装备器材保障管理的系统性和集成性,提高了装备器材保障的时效性和敏捷性。     

Estimating failure time distribution and its parameters based on intermediate data from a Wiener degradation model

Instead of measuring a Wiener degradation or performance process at predetermined time points to track degradation or performance of a product for estimating its lifetime, we propose to obtain the first‐passage times of the process over certain nonfailure thresholds. Based on only these intermediate data, we obtain the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator and uniformly most accurate confidence interval for the mean lifetime. For estimating the lifetime distribution function, we propose a modified maximum likelihood estimator and a new estimator and prove that, by increasing the sample size of the intermediate data, these estimators and the above‐mentioned estimator of the mean lifetime can achieve the same levels of accuracy as the estimators assuming one has failure times. Thus, our method of using only intermediate data is useful for highly reliable products when their failure times are difficult to obtain. Furthermore, we show that the proposed new estimator of the lifetime distribution function is more accurate than the standard and modified maximum likelihood estimators. We also obtain approximate confidence intervals for the lifetime distribution function and its percentiles. Finally, we use light‐emitting diodes as an example to illustrate our method and demonstrate how to validate the Wiener assumption during the testing. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008     

舰艇编队作战系统的武器目标分配问题

设我方m艘战舰,对方n个来袭目标.运用灰色局势决策求得目标对各个战舰产生的威胁值排序;再用模拟退火算法,参考目标威胁,单舰根据自身装载的火力发射进行初步武器分配;最后将分配结果传送至融合中心,应用大系统理论的分解协调法,协调武器分配,使得我方武器对本批目标的打击概率最大.仿真基于VC++编程实现,具体分析了算法及思想的可行性.     

Optimal sample size allocation for tests with multiple levels of stress with extreme value regression

In this article, we discuss the optimal allocation problem in a multiple stress levels life‐testing experiment when an extreme value regression model is used for statistical analysis. We derive the maximum likelihood estimators, the Fisher information, and the asymptotic variance–covariance matrix of the maximum likelihood estimators. Three optimality criteria are defined and the optimal allocation of units for two‐ and k‐stress level situations are determined. We demonstrate the efficiency of the optimal allocation of units in a multiple stress levels life‐testing experiment by using real experimental situations discussed earlier by McCool and Nelson and Meeker. Monte Carlo simulations are used to show that the optimality results hold for small sample sizes as well. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007     

运动载体涡流磁场数值计算与特性分析

为提高运动载体涡流磁干扰建模与补偿的精度,对载体运动引起的涡流磁场的产生机理和分布特性进行分析研究。首先,对涡流磁场的产生机理进行了溯源分析;然后,采用有限元法对涡流磁场进行数值计算研究。考虑到计算空间包含结构的磁导率单一问题,采用了有限元节点法矢量磁位计算方式,并针对舱体壁计算单元,考虑了耦合积分电势自由度,同时考虑到磁场周期变化,采用了瞬态有限元计算方式;最后,通过数值计算分析,揭示了运动载体涡流磁场与外磁场变化频率的关系,并分析了涡流磁场沿径向和轴向的空间分布特性和传播规律,为运动载体涡流磁场干扰的高精度建模与补偿奠定了基础。     

基于相关性函数的多站微动特征分析与提取

针对多站雷达精度跨度大、难以有效进行融合识别的问题,提出了基于相关性函数的多站加权融合方法。首先建立了弹道目标滑动散射模型,通过时延相乘重构回波,并利用扩展Hough变换提取出距离像的曲线参数,从而建立方程组以求取微动信息。然后利用相关性函数对各雷达的支持度进行分析,最终对支持度高的观测数据进行融合识别。仿真结果表明该方法计算简单,能有效提高微动参数的估计精度,客观地反映各部雷达的可靠度。     

A general model of heterogeneous system lifetimes and conditions for system burn‐in

Burn‐in is a technique to enhance reliability by eliminating weak items from a population of items having heterogeneous lifetimes. System burn‐in can improve system reliability, but the conditions for system burn‐in to be performed after component burn‐in remain a little understood mathematical challenge. To derive such conditions, we first introduce a general model of heterogeneous system lifetimes, in which the component burn‐in information and assembly problems are related to the prediction of system burn‐in. Many existing system burn‐in models become special cases and two important results are identified. First, heterogeneous system lifetimes can be understood naturally as a consequence of heterogeneous component lifetimes and heterogeneous assembly quality. Second, system burn‐in is effective if assembly quality variation in the components and connections which are arranged in series is greater than a threshold, where the threshold depends on the system structure and component failure rates. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 50: 364–380, 2003.     

Scheduling a production–distribution system to optimize the tradeoff between delivery tardiness and distribution cost

We consider a make‐to‐order production–distribution system with one supplier and one or more customers. A set of orders with due dates needs to be processed by the supplier and delivered to the customers upon completion. The supplier can process one order at a time without preemption. Each customer is at a distinct location and only orders from the same customer can be batched together for delivery. Each delivery shipment has a capacity limit and incurs a distribution cost. The problem is to find a joint schedule of order processing at the supplier and order delivery from the supplier to the customers that optimizes an objective function involving the maximum delivery tardiness and the total distribution cost. We first study the solvability of various cases of the problem by either providing an efficient algorithm or proving the intractability of the problem. We then develop a fast heuristic for the general problem. We show that the heuristic is asymptotically optimal as the number of orders goes to infinity. We also evaluate the performance of the heuristic computationally by using lower bounds obtained by a column generation approach. Our results indicate that the heuristic is capable of generating near optimal solutions quickly. Finally, we study the value of production–distribution integration by comparing our integrated approach with two sequential approaches where scheduling decisions for order processing are made first, followed by order delivery decisions, with no or only partial integration of the two decisions. We show that in many cases, the integrated approach performs significantly better than the sequential approaches. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2005