防区外联合攻击武器火控系统分析与研究

从一般的空面精确制导武器系统到远射程的防区外联合攻击武器系统,技术更新和发展很多.针对防区外联合攻击武器系统的特点,对防区外联合攻击武器火控系统的总体技术进行了研究探讨,对其武器火控系统的组成、功能、攻击发射方式、工作流程等进行了分析,给出了防区外联合攻击武器火控系统精度分析与分配的方法,并进行了仿真计算和分析,验证了精度分析的有效性.     

作战分队武器系统的作战效能

战斗分队是未来联合作战中系统对抗的基本单元,以仿生学原理和系统工程理论为指导,建立了分队武器系统作战效能指标体系,并运用层次分析法建立了相应评估模型.最后以两组装甲步兵分队为例,分别评估了其在进攻(对峙)和防御中的作战效能,验证了该指标体系和评估模型的科学性和实用性.为指导员进行科学决策提供了理论依据.     

一种新的MIMO非线性系统动态解耦控制方法

提出了一种基于回归小波网络(recurrent wavelet networks)的多输入多输出系统(multi-input multi-output)动态解耦控制的新方法.该方法为分散式控制结构,采用回归小波网络作为解耦辨识器(decoupling identifier),在线动态辨识、回馈对应输入输出的灵敏度信息(sensitivity information),PID神经网络控制器根据回馈信息实现自适应分散独立控制.小波函数的紧支性、波动性以及回归网络较强的动态非线性映射能力使得回归小波网络具有较好的综合性能.仿真结果表明,用该方法构成的控制系统解耦效果好,收敛速度快,且具有较好的鲁棒性.     

压制兵器火控系统发展趋势分析

从部队编制体制变革,数字化部队建设,新技术、新装备、新材料的出现等多方面分析压制兵器发展面临的形势,以及国外压制兵器发展现状,总结分析压制兵器的发展趋势,并归纳提炼出火控系统应从信息综合化、系统模块化、系统体系结构分布化、功能一体化、火控射击控制闭环化和快速实时解算等6个方面发展趋势,以实现精确、快速、协同的综合武器控制.     

武器-目标分配(WTA)问题研究进展

对武器-目标分配(WTA)问题的研究现状与进展进行了总结与述评.介绍了WTA问题的概念、基本模型、数学性质以及WTA问题研究的基本内容.目前WTA问题的研究内容主要集中在模型研究与算法研究两个方面.模型研究以静态模型的研究为主,但动态模型的研究还不够深入;算法研究则主要采用智能算法对WTA问题进行求解.目前基本上已经解决了小规模的静态WTA问题,但尚未有效解决大规模的动态WTA问题.     

营区锅炉供暖节能优化控制系统的研究

详细论述了以某部营区为试点单位,通过微处理器控制模块、气候补偿器、变频器等先进技术,对原有燃气锅炉供暖系统进行节能优化控制的改造措施。通过改造,可解决原有系统存在的能源浪费现象,降低供暖成本,达到良好的节能降耗效果。该方案也适用于燃煤锅炉供暖系统的节能改造。     

简易坦克火控系统的校正与射击修正

分析了某型坦克简易火控系统的性能特点,阐述了火控系统校正方法, 指出了火控系统校正中的常见错误,总结了射击指挥与射击修正方法。     

基于价值的指挥主体作战指挥行为评估

作战指挥行为是作战指挥理论的一个重要方面。在明确了其概念后,将价值这一概念引入作战指挥行为评估,认为价值的创造主体是作战指挥行为,并以此作为评估的基础。最后,利用数据挖掘中的关联规则实现评估的量化,并结合案例说明该方法的有效性。     

Building the next nuclear community

This viewpoint takes stock of the changes in the strategic nuclear landscape in recent decades and reflects on its consequences on the policy community. It finds that the number and scope of issues have expanded considerably; they have manifested themselves in many more regions of the world; and they have become deeply politicized and polarized. The consequences have been twofold: the nuclear policy field has seen the development of an increasingly diverse expert community composed of highly specialized functionalists and regionalists, and it has become ever more divided into two entirely separate ideological camps—one that believes in deterrence, the other in disarmament. The stove-piping of expertise and the widening gap between deterrence and disarmament ideologies are immensely problematic because, in different ways, they stand in the way of the emergence of a better and safer nuclear future. Looking ahead, it is critical to “bust the silos of expertise” and to build bridges between the deterrence and disarmament ideological camps. Only such a community-building effort will help solve today’s and tomorrow’s nuclear challenges.     

INCAPACITATING BIOCHEMICAL WEAPONS

Military interest in incapacitating biochemical weapons has grown in recent years as advances in science and technology have appeared to offer the promise of new “non-lethal” weapons useful for a variety of politically and militarily challenging situations. There is, in fact, a long and unfulfilled history of attempts to develop such weapons. It is clear that advances are opening up a range of possibilities for future biological and chemical weapons more generally. The treaties prohibiting biological and chemical weapons make no distinction between lethal and “non-lethal” weapons—all are equally prohibited. Indeed, a sharp and technically meaningful distinction between lethal and “non-lethal” biological and chemical weapons is beyond the capability of science to make. Thus, interest in incapacitating biochemical weapons, and efforts on the part of various states to develop them, pose a significant challenge to the treaty regimes, to the norms against biological and chemical warfare that they embody, and, ultimately, to the essential protections that they provide. Preventing a new generation of biological and chemical weapons from emerging will take concerted efforts and action at the local, national, and international levels.