Justifying Cyber-intelligence?

The surge in threats aided by or carried out through cyberspace has placed significant pressure on the intelligence community to adapt or leave itself open to attack. Indeed, many in both political and intelligence circles argue for access to ever greater amounts of cyber information in order to catch potential threats before they become real. By collecting all our digital information, the intelligence community argues that it is not only able to detail what people have done or are currently doing but also predict what their next move might be. However, the ethical implications are unclear and the backlash following Edward Snowden’s revelations have shown that such activities are not without controversy. This leaves the debate stuck between the important, ethical role that intelligence can play and the potential for its unrestrained use to cause undue harm. This paper will resolve this by giving greater detail to cyber-intelligence practices, highlighting the different levels of harm that the various intelligence operations can cause. The essence of this paper is not that cyber-intelligence should be banned outright, but that it can be justified given the necessary circumstances. Therefore, the paper will develop a specialised set of Just Cyber-Intelligence Principles, built on the just war tradition, to outline if and when such activities are justified.     

Rethinking Military Virtue Ethics in an Age of Unmanned Weapons

Although most styles of military ethics are hybrids that draw on multiple ethical theories, they are usually based primarily on the model of Aristotelian virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is well-suited for regulating the conduct of soldiers who have to make quick decisions on the battlefield, but its applicability to military personnel is threatened by the growing use of unmanned weapon systems. These weapons disrupt virtue ethics’ institutional and cultural basis by changing what it means to display virtue and transforming the roles soldiers perform and the nature of the military profession itself. I argue that in light of these challenges to virtue ethics, at least as it is traditionally understood within the armed forces, soldiers operating unmanned weapons require a more heavily rule-based approach to military ethics.     

应用全站仪综合测量火炮偏离角及俯仰半径

提出一种应用全站仪进行火炮偏离角和俯仰半径的综合测量方法。应用最小二乘原理拟合出火炮俯仰半径,然后解算出火炮偏离角,并用Monte Carlo方法分析了测量结果的精度。结果表明:全站仪高低角和火炮仰角的测量精度均对火炮偏离角和俯仰半径的测量结果无明显影响;全站仪测距精度对火炮俯仰半径测量结果的影响较大;全站仪水平角测量精度对火炮偏离角测量结果的影响明显。该方法在现场操作时需要重点关注全站仪水平观测角和测距的检测精度。     

救捞工程中的多指标决策方法探讨

建立了基于综合权重的双基点多指标决策模型。分别从主观和客观两个方面来分析评估指标的权重,迭加得到综合权重,并利用它进行相对贴近度分析,从而判断方案的优劣,得到最佳方案,使问题的优化与决策更加科学、合理。以拖带方案的优化决策分析为例,验证了多指标决策模型的可行性,简述了它在救捞工程中的应用方法。     

ATIE:一种自适应的可调域间出口选择算法

TIE算法能对域间出口的选择进行调节,但是该算法的参数计算过于复杂,并且出口选择的调节并不能随负载的变化而变化,因此提出了一种自适应的可调域间出口选择算法ATIE,该算法能够满足流量工程和网络健壮性要求,并通过参数T的改变随当前负载的变化而变化.实验表明,ATIE算法能够在控制剖面敏感性和随负载变化的流量工程自适应性上达到合理的折衷.     

“管理科学与工程“专业硕士研究生培养与实践

针对学院“管理科学与工程专业”研究生的培养,详细讨论了该学科的定位和培养目标;结合军队特点,论证了培养方向以及相应培养计划的制订;结合培养过程中教学与科研紧密结合的特点,介绍了人才培养与学术、科研并重所取得的实际成果以及在职研究生培养的若干经验;说明了围绕学科建设在加强学术队伍和教学基础建设方面进行的主要工作;并对目前存在的一些具体问题进行了探讨。     

战争设计工程中从定量到定性反思的方法

定性定量相结合是战争设计工程的技术基础,为了探讨定性定量相结合中的如何从定量到定性进行反思,提出了定量评价干预策略的一致性检验方法;研究了从定量到定性反思的实现方法。最后以一个实例说明了整个从定量到定性进行反思的过程,并证实该反思方法是有效可行的。     

基于可拓工程方法的维修保障系统效能评估研究

分析了维修保障系统效能的影响因素,应用可拓工程方法建立了维修保障系统效能多指标参数的物元可拓评估模型,以定量的结果对维修保障系统效能进行了评估分级,并与层次分析法和突变评价法的结果进行了比较,结论基本一致.为维修保障系统效能评估问题寻求出一种新的方法,其评估结果可为决策提供定量依据.     

伦理教育维度下工程院校校园网络文化构建

在工程院校网络文化构建中,充分发挥伦理教育功能是素质教育的重要内容。工程伦理教育作为人文教育与科技教育交叉结合的新学科,要求高校尤其是工程院校在网络文化构建中,确立科学的教育理念、正确的舆论导向,多学科交叉配合,培育学生树立社会责任感,正确的价值观、利益观和强烈的伦理道德意识。     

抢险救灾工程破碎机械保障效能评估

破碎作业是抢险救灾工程保障的重要内容.以抗震救灾工程机械抢险作业理论与实践为基础,运用层次分析法构建了工程破碎机械保障效能评价指标体系,探索了相应的评价方法,并应用于工程保障实践.实践表明,该方法有利于抢险救灾科学决策,对合理选配工程机械,提高突发事件工程保障效能具有积极的促进作用.