装备保障训练系统设计理论研究综述

对美军装备保障训练系统的设计理论、方法进行了研究与综述,对国内相关研究进行了总结。针对我军装备保障训练系统设计中存在的不足,提出了装备保障训练系统设计理论研究应着重解决的问题。     

基于灰色层次分析法的侦察装备效能评估

针对侦察系统性能参数的不确定性,本文把灰色理论与层次分析法相结合,运用灰色层次分析综合评估模型,对侦察系统的效能进行评估。用专家评估分析法确定侦察装备效能评价指标权重,用灰色评估理论建立侦察系统效能评估模型。以某常规侦察雷达为例,用建立的模型进行量化评估,充分利用决策者的判断信息,较为准确地反映实际情况,验证了评估模型的可靠性。该模型可为部队作战提供装备的效能数据,为发展新型装备提供依据。其方法和成果可供其它武器系统效能评估时借鉴参考。     

灰色局势决策理论在炮兵火力计划优选中的运用

为了解决炮兵火力计划选择的随意性和盲目性,提出了以灰色理论为基础,综合考虑炮兵火力计划的性质和拟制原则的优选方法;深入研究了局势决策在计划优选中的应用;最后举例说明了灰色局势决策理论在计划优选中的应用,进一步证明了其科学性和创新性,为优选决策提供了一种定量和定性相结合的新方法。     

Models of sensor operations for border surveillance

This article is motivated by the diverse array of border threats, ranging from terrorists to arms dealers and human traffickers. We consider a moving sensor that patrols a certain section of a border with the objective to detect infiltrators who attempt to penetrate that section. Infiltrators arrive according to a Poisson process along the border with a specified distribution of arrival location, and disappear a random amount of time after their arrival. The measures of effectiveness are the target (infiltrator) detection rate and the time elapsed from target arrival to target detection. We study two types of sensor trajectories that have constant endpoints, are periodic, and maintain constant speed: (1) a sensor that jumps instantaneously from the endpoint back to the starting‐point, and (2) a sensor that moves continuously back and forth. The controlled parameters (decision variables) are the starting and end points of the patrolled sector and the velocity of the sensor. General properties of these trajectories are investigated. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008     

杂合数据的粗糙集属性约简方法

针对决策表中属性取值为杂合数据的情况,提出了基于粗糙集理论的属性约简算法.首先给出了对象间在杂合数据下的相似度计算定义.为了获取合理的对象集合的软划分,给出了阈值计算的最优化模型,并基于粗糙集的上、下近似的概念,得到对象集合在条件属性下的上、下近似的覆盖划分.之后,通过各对象基于条件属性和决策属性的上、下近似下的分布矩阵描述,利用最大分布矩阵,直观地得到两种不同观点下的约简结果.实验结果表明了本算法的合理和有效性.     

C~4KISR系统集成的一体化价值

结合当前军事指挥理论的发展,首先概述了C4KISR系统的发展现状,列举了C4KISR 4个重要组成部分的功能作用.其次论述了C4KISR系统与一体化的关系,分析了C4KISR系统集成的一体化实质,指出部队进行信息化建设的根本目的是要加强整体协同作战能力,寻求全局最优的策略.最后从排队论的角度,对C4KISR系统集成的一体化价值进行了量化对比分析,对比计算的结果显示:实现一体化集成的C4KISR系统的各项指标明显优于集成前的各单个子系统的各项指标,从侧面揭示了信息化在新军事变革中的重大现实意义.     

基于可信性理论的标准-3拦截弹末段修正能力分析

基于可信性理论对标准-3拦截弹末段修正能力进行分析。由拦截末段相对运动动力学推导了标准-3拦截弹末段可消除的最大零控脱靶量解析表达式;针对其中的参数不确定性,将不确定参数视为模糊变量运用可信性理论进行建模,采用模糊模拟算法得到标准-3末段可消除的最大零控脱靶量的可能性测度悲观值和乐观值,可信性测度均值和标准差及可能性、必要性和可信性分布函数。本文研究为弹道导弹中段机动突防动力系统设计提供了理论依据,同时为如何根据有限的已知信息获得合理的未知信息提供了有效途径。     

Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments

The current combat motivation model based on primary group thesis assumes that the main force behind motivation is peer-bonding or otherwise known as unit cohesion. Cohesion is perceived as an all-encompassing factor that leads to satisfactory (or unsatisfactory in lack thereof) military effectiveness and performance in conflict environments. However, the article identifies three main problems with this perspective: 1. mono-dimensional view of motivation; 2. motivation based on heteronomy, and 3. self-reporting bias. The current model does not consider motivation as a separate entity from cohesion; it does not place motivation as fundamental human value; lastly, it takes motivation as granted by-product of socialization. The article proposes a new combat motivation model based on The Self-Determination Theory. The theory maintains that human motivation requires satisfaction of three psychological needs of competence, relatedness, and autonomy. The degree of satisfaction of those three needs leads to different types of regulated motivations – a continuum from intrinsic to extrinsic – each of which has specifiable consequences for learning, performance, and well-being of an individual.     

Fighting a Just War in the Midst of an Unreasonable International Strife: World War I and the Collapse of the Central European System of the Triple Imperial Dominion

ABSTRACT

This article constitutes an attempt to demonstrate the complexity of factors affecting the legitimate acquisition and reasonable exercise by a political community of the right to war as specified in the just war criteria of jus ad bellum. To achieve this purpose, a brief analysis is presented of the intentional participation in World War I of thousands of Polish volunteers forming military units deployed by the Central Powers on the Austrian-Russian front. Considered in light of the standard principles of just war, the military enterprise of the Polish Legions, as they were called, turns out to be a paradoxical instance of warfare which, while being part of a state-to-state aggression, must be deemed compliant with all the principles in question. As a means of explaining this paradox, a modification of the concept of justified intervention is proposed, embracing military efforts aimed at the ultimate defeat of all the (unjustly) warring parties operating within a given territory. In consonance with the classic just war approach, it is also argued that the justification for such an intervention is essentially dependent on its being initiated by, or attributable to, an unquestionable state agent acting in defence of the state’s basic prerogatives.     

Rethinking strategic culture: A computational (social science) discursive-institutionalist approach

ABSTRACT

The strategic culture approach has been suffering from a prolonged theoretical stalemate, despite a surge in case studies, which culminated in the Johnston-Gray debate and subsequent schism. The present paper outlines a new approach designed to overcome this deadlock, and consists of three arguments. First, the three previous generations of strategic culture studies have failed to explain how strategic culture influences behaviour. Second, aligning strategic culture theory-building with discursive institutionalism offers a way to overcome this fundamental fallacy. Third, a research programme for strategic culture should draw on computational social science to enable it to present and test middle-range theories.