海德格尔与基本本体论

海德格尔的整个哲学体系是在区别“存在”和“存在者”的不同含义的基础上建立起来的。在海德格尔看来,此在的本真性生存也就是存在的意义,作为基础存在论的生存论是此在对自己存在的领悟并在领悟基础上的解释。海德格尔以人的生存为基础,使哲学获得了更加广阔的视野,但未能完全摆脱传统本体论思路的消极影响。     

基于模糊集理论和D-S证据推理的空袭目标识别

目标识别是防空作战指挥过程中信息处理的一个重要环节。在基于模糊理论目标识别基础上,引入D-S证据理论,通过对模糊隶属度进行重新分配,较好地克服了随机因素的影响,可望进一步提高对空中目标的正确识别率。     

基于灰色系统理论的火灾事故预测方法

简要叙述应用灰色系统理论进行火灾事故预测的理论和方法 ,建立了火灾事故预测的GM (1,1)模型 ,并用该模型对火灾事故进行预测。     

基于灰熵方法的综合评估

以灰色系统理论中的灰靶技术为基础,在对原靶心度求解公式加以改进,给出了了一种系统效能的评定方法。首先用灰靶理论建立评定方法的数学模型,以能反映武器系统效能的战技性能指标构造各比较方案或模式的指标序列,进而求得各指标序列的标准模式。通过求各比较模式对标准模式的靶心度,并按大小排序,最终确定各比较方案效能的优劣。方法的计算过程为简单的代数运算,且不涉及传统方法中类似人工打分等带有一定主观性因素,所以,就同时满足可操作性和客观性而言,本方法较传统方法为优。     

F—K理论在堆积固体自燃火灾调查中的应用

堆积固体自燃火灾是常见多发火灾,由于其规模庞大、着火延迟期长等特点,难以进行全尺寸的模拟实验,为火灾预防和调查工作带来了一定的难度。基于F—K（Frank—Kamenetskii）理论,将小规模实验结果外推,从而预测或判断一定尺寸的堆积固体在一定的环境温度下自燃起火的危险性。     

软件保障性评估在维修性分配和预计软件中的应用

从软件保障性的影响要素——软件生命周期过程、软件自身的设计特性和保障资源出发,阐明了软件保障性评估的原理,提出了一套软件保障性评估方案。通过在某维修性分配和预计软件上的具体实践,充分验证了该评估方案的可行性和实用性。     

基于AHP和模糊理论的导弹快艇C3I系统效能评估

针对某型导弹快艇的C3I系统作战效能评估的需要,采用AHP法确定C3I系统作战能力指标及相应各指标的权重,然后运用模糊综合评判对该导弹快艇的C3I系统能力进行综合评估,为舰艇作战指挥人员了解系统作战效能和系统研制人员改进系统提供定量依据。     

A theory of war economies

This article presents a proposed theory of how war economies are formed and maintained, as well as an integrated policy framework to guide the dismantling of war economies emanating from the proposed theory. Additionally, six potential areas for future research pertaining to the dismantling of war economies are also presented.     

静态初始条件下的歼击机中距攻防引导方法决策

在静态初始条件下,歼击机中距攻防引导方法的选择是一个定性与定量相结合的类别划分问题,因此,将粗糙集理论与概率神经网络相结合用于该问题的解决。首先,利用粗糙集理论实现专家知识约简、空战态势信息集压缩,得到最小决策信息集;其次,利用概率神经网络进行概率决策推理;最后,通过实例分析,结果表明决策推理正确,在不确定环境下仍然有效,提高了决策过程的自动化程度。     

Supply chain coordination with product line design and a revenue sharing scheme

Many manufacturers sell their products through retailers and share the revenue with those retailers. Given this phenomenon, we build a stylized model to investigate the role of revenue sharing schemes in supply chain coordination and product variety decisions. In our model, a monopolistic manufacturer serves two segments of consumers, which are distinguished by their willingness to pay for quality. In the scenario with exogenous revenue sharing ratios, when the potential gain from serving the low segment is substantial (e.g., the low‐segment consumers' willingness to pay is high enough or the low segment takes a large enough proportion of the market), the retailer is better off abandoning the revenue sharing scheme. Moreover, when the potential gain from serving the low (high) segment is substantial enough, the manufacturer finds it profitable to offer a single product. Furthermore, when revenue sharing ratios are endogenous, we divide our analysis into two cases, depending on the methods of cooperation. When revenue sharing ratios are negotiated at the very beginning, the decentralized supply chain causes further distortion. This suggests that the central premise of revenue sharing—the coordination of supply chains—may be undermined if supply chain parties meticulously bargain over it.