灰色局势决策理论在炮兵火力计划优选中的运用

为了解决炮兵火力计划选择的随意性和盲目性,提出了以灰色理论为基础,综合考虑炮兵火力计划的性质和拟制原则的优选方法;深入研究了局势决策在计划优选中的应用;最后举例说明了灰色局势决策理论在计划优选中的应用,进一步证明了其科学性和创新性,为优选决策提供了一种定量和定性相结合的新方法。     

Simultaneous determination of production and maintenance schedules using in‐line equipment condition and yield information

In many manufacturing environments, equipment condition has a significant impact on product quality, or yield. This paper presents a semi‐Markov decision process model of a single‐stage production system with multiple products and multiple maintenance actions. The model simultaneously determines maintenance and production schedules, accounting for the fact that equipment condition affects the yield of each product differently. It extends earlier work by allowing the expected time between decision epochs to vary by both action and machine state, by allowing multiple maintenance actions, and by treating the outcome of maintenance as less than certain. Sufficient conditions are developed that ensure the monotonicity of both the optimal production and maintenance actions. While the maintenance conditions closely resemble previously studied conditions for this type of problem, the production conditions represent a significant departure from earlier results. The simultaneous solution method is compared to an approach commonly used in industry, where the maintenance and production problems are treated independently. Solving more than one thousand test problems confirms that the combination of both features of the model—accounting for product differences and solving the problems simultaneously—has a significant impact on performance. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008     

FN-IOWA算子的模糊弹性决策作战效能评估

群决策中往往参与决策的单位或专家会来自不同的专业和部门,这些决策者具有不同的性质.为了处理不同性质决策者之间的模糊信息,引入模糊弹性决策的概念.传统作战效能评估往往是由单一性质的决策者进行,这样会失掉很多专业信息,也会使评估结果片面.基于FN-IOWA算子的模糊弹性决策方法能融合评估中的模糊信息,有效完善传统作战效能评估方法,使评估结果更合理.     

基于Markov决策支持系统的坦克排作战效能预测

分析了Markov模型的一般预测过程,建立了一种基于Markov决策支持系统的作战效能预测分析模型,根据坦克排在担负不同作战任务时的特点,给出了坦克排作战效能预测分析的应用实例,预测分析的结果表明,该模型能够对作战态势做以正确的预测,有利于指挥员更好地进行兵力部署,发挥坦克排作战的最佳效能.     

Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments

The current combat motivation model based on primary group thesis assumes that the main force behind motivation is peer-bonding or otherwise known as unit cohesion. Cohesion is perceived as an all-encompassing factor that leads to satisfactory (or unsatisfactory in lack thereof) military effectiveness and performance in conflict environments. However, the article identifies three main problems with this perspective: 1. mono-dimensional view of motivation; 2. motivation based on heteronomy, and 3. self-reporting bias. The current model does not consider motivation as a separate entity from cohesion; it does not place motivation as fundamental human value; lastly, it takes motivation as granted by-product of socialization. The article proposes a new combat motivation model based on The Self-Determination Theory. The theory maintains that human motivation requires satisfaction of three psychological needs of competence, relatedness, and autonomy. The degree of satisfaction of those three needs leads to different types of regulated motivations – a continuum from intrinsic to extrinsic – each of which has specifiable consequences for learning, performance, and well-being of an individual.