未来第四战场--太空

从太空战场的由来出发,简要叙述了太空战、太空战场的定义作战样式及其意义,并且对太空战场的作战武器和"天军"作了介绍,最后对未来太空战场的建设提出了自己的意见.     

导弹作战对抗模拟虚拟现实系统研究

将虚拟现实（ｖｉｒｔｕａｌｒｅａｌｉｔｙ,英文缩写为ＶＲ）技术引入到导弹作战对抗模拟研究中,提出了导弹作战对抗模拟虚拟现实系统的基本结构并分析了该系统的特点。     

天波超视距雷达评述

天波超视距雷达以其独特的工作方式使它在抗低空突防、抗隐身、抗反辐射导弹（ＡＲＭ）、抗电子干扰这“四抗”性能上有天然的优势。与其它雷达相比,效费比极高。其分布式结构也使它的抗毁性很强,但它极受环境因素制约。就该雷达的工作原理和特点、设计上要考虑的环境因素、性能、开发试验和部署及应用前景进行了讨论。     

电子战系统及其发展

叙述了电子战系统的最新定义以及电子战系统在现代战争中的地位和作用,介绍了国外电子战系统的主要装备和电子战系统的发展趋势。     

光电对抗在对巡航导弹分层防御中的应用

针对现代防空体系的特点,介绍了巡航导弹及其制导方式,并从巡航导弹自身弱点、实战中的不足以及技术上的可对抗性进行了各方面分析,提出了巡航导弹是可以进行对抗的,尤其是利用光电对抗手段进行对抗的可行性、重要性.目前对巡航导弹的分层防御相对来说费用相当昂贵,而采用光电对抗手段是廉价而又有效的.通过对光电对抗的可行性分析,列出了以侦察告警、定向红外干扰、高重频激光干扰、激光致盲、激光摧毁、烟幕干扰、光电隐身等光电对抗手段进行对抗巡航导弹的方法,并进行探讨.最后对光电技术及光电对抗装备技术的发展趋势作了描述.     

舰炮防空战法的可视化技术

舰炮防空是水面舰艇自防御的重要手段之一.文章围绕可视化和虚拟现实技术,分析了舰炮防空战法研究的内容,给出了舰炮防空战法可视化的方法,重点探讨了其中的防空弹道仿真、反舰导弹弹道仿真、海浪水文气象环境仿真、战场焰火和爆炸效果仿真及舰炮防空战法仿真中实时碰撞检测的基本方法和优化技术,提出了解决这些问题的主要方法,并在PC机上进行了实现.最后给出了舰炮防空战法的可视化结果.     

Attrition models of the Ardennes campaign

This paper revisits the modeling by Bracken [3] of the Ardennes campaign of World War II using the Lanchester equations. It revises and extends that analysis in a number of ways: (1) It more accurately fits the model parameters using linear regression; (2) it considers the data from the entire campaign; and (3) it adds in air sortie data. In contrast to previous results, it concludes by showing that neither the Lanchester linear or Lanchester square laws fit the data. A new form of the Lanchester equations emerges with a physical interpretation. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 45: 1–22, 1998     

Vicarious warfare: The counterproductive consequences of modern American military practice

This article examines contemporary modes of American warfare. It posits the concept of “vicarious warfare” as a means of capturing prominent patterns in warfighting approaches. Although rooted in long-standing traditions of military practice, vicarious warfare is sufficiently novel as to be identifiable as a distinct phenomenon. The precise manifestation or combination of vicarious methods vary according to the specific circumstances and political contexts prevailing in different theaters. However, America’s general preference is to fight its wars by delegating tasks to proxies and limiting exposure of its own military to danger. Where U.S. forces are employed directly, this takes place largely in the shadows. Such approaches have clear attractions, offer undoubted tactical advantages, and permit successive administrations to maintain a persistent tempo of operations that evades rigorous democratic scrutiny. Yet, prominent cases and numerous studies suggest that vicarious warfare has a high potential to generate counterproductive effects and significant strategic harm.     

Think again – supplying war: reappraising military logistics and its centrality to strategy and war

This article argues that logistics constrains strategic opportunity while itself being heavily circumscribed by strategic and operational planning. With the academic literature all but ignoring the centrality of logistics to strategy and war, this article argues for a reappraisal of the critical role of military logistics, and posits that the study and conduct of war and strategy are incomplete at best or false at worst when they ignore this crucial component of the art of war. The article conceptualises the logistics–strategy nexus in a novel way, explores its contemporary manifestation in an age of uncertainty, and applies it to a detailed case study of UK operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001.     

Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature

This article examines critically the literature of hybrid war and evaluates the countermeasures often proposed. It explains the concept of hybrid warfare and its varied interpretations, illustrating how it is a manifestation of current anxieties in armed conflict. The selection of the literature is based on works that are referenced, that offer a scientific approach, and which review either the phenomenon of hybrid warfare or its countermeasures empirically. Unscientific works have been omitted. The analysis of the literature presented here shows that the antidotes to ‘hybridity’ lie not in the operational or tactical sphere but in strategic and political domains.