以用户为中心的防空导弹武器系统人机界面设计研究

防空导弹武器系统不断更新换代,复杂功能和简单操作需求的矛盾成为设计过程中普遍存在的问题。为优化防空导弹武器系统人机界面设计,运用人机交互学中以用户为中心的设计和评估理论,对防空导弹武器系统人机界面设计进行研究。将设计过程分为用户与需求分析、设计、评估与改进三个阶段,给出了每个阶段的工作思路以及工作重点。将方法应用于某型防空导弹武器系统人机界面设计,有效地规范了设计流程,提高了设计水平。     

局部最大延迟检测抗转发欺骗干扰算法

接收机在进行窄带干扰抑制后,其输出信号的相关峰会发生分裂。使用传统的基于信号到达时间的抗转发欺骗干扰算法,会使得捕获锁定的相关值为真实信号的旁瓣。针对该问题提出一种基于局部相关值最大的时延检测方法,在真实信号相关峰分裂所产生的旁瓣与欺骗信号不重合前提下,通过对主瓣三个码片范围内最大值的搜索,保证捕获不会锁定在旁瓣,再选择局部最大值中的最早码相位点从而避免锁定到转发欺骗干扰。与传统的基于信号到达时间的抗转发欺骗干扰算法相比,在无窄带干扰情况下,所提算法性能相当;在存在窄带干扰情况下,其性能明显优于传统算法。通过数值仿真验证了方法的有效性。     

弹/枪相互作用引起的运动步枪枪口振动分析

为研究身管结构参数变化对运动步枪枪口振动的影响规律,采用非线性有限元方法建立了运动步枪弹/枪相互作用数值计算模型。借助压力测试系统对运动步枪进行了膛压测试试验;使用高速摄影设备实测了枪口在发射过程中竖直方向的振动规律,通过对比枪口实测数据与数值计算结果验证了模型的正确性。数值模型为研究参数变化对枪口振动的影响提供了理论基础,研究结果对工程实践具有一定实际意义。     

基于PXI总线的雷达装备通用模块接口电路设计

为做好对部队雷达装备日常性能的检测与维护,充分保障其性能的可靠性,研制开发了基于PXI总线的雷达装备性能检测模块。在对模块的接口电路的设计中,采用目前流行的PCI9030接口芯片,简化了设计难度。经实验验证,采用该方案的各模块都实现了相应的功能,达到了预期的设计目的。需要改进的方面是接口电路中热插拔部分性能的可靠性有待进一步提高。     

通用装备机液系统综合检测试验平台综合信息管理系统设计与实现

探讨了通用装备机液系统综合检测试验平台综合信息管理系统在网络和功能结构、信息处理流程、数据分类和数据结构、数据传输接口等方面的设计方法,该设计方法在通用装备机液系统综合检测试验平台综合信息管理系统项目中进行了应用,取得了良好效果,为类似的综合管理信息系统的设计探索了一条有效的路径。     

激波/湍流边界层干扰中的自适应控制技术

从激波/湍流边界层干扰机理以及流动控制的迫切需求入手,从自适应涡流发生器、自适应鼓包、自适应微射流以及自适应次流循环四个方面对激波/湍流边界层干扰中的自适应控制技术研究进展进行了总结。分析认为,结合AI技术发展自适应流动控制技术,加速控制方式智能化,可作为新一代高超声速飞行器宽速域飞行的重要技术手段。具体来说,就是通过调节外加激励对高超声速飞行器不同区域实现局部流动加/减速、气动热防护、气动控制等功能,根据流场参数建立控制反馈回路,自适应调整局部流场结构,以满足工程实际需求。     

一种定征层状平面结构界面粘接强度的兰姆波方法

置于层状平面结构表面的斜劈超声换能器被用于激发和接收多模兰姆波。文章首先分析了采用多模兰姆波的幅频特性定征界面粘接强度的可行性。基于Ritec-SNAP 超声测量系统,建立了采用兰姆波方法定征层状结构界面粘接强度的实验系统。对于给定的层状平面结构,将粘接层的固化过程用于模拟粘接层界面强度的变化过程。对于不同的粘接层固化时间,实验测得的多模兰姆波幅频曲线明显不同。借助于声——超声技术中的应力波因子,给出了兰姆波应力波因子的定义。实验结果显示,兰姆波应力波因子与间接表示界面粘接强度的固化时间之间存在确定的单调对应关系,表明将多模兰姆波的应力波因子用于定征层状平面结构的界面粘接强度是可行的。     

裂解温度对PIP制备2D Cf/Si-O-C复合材料结构与性能的影响

以二维碳纤维布、硅树脂先驱体、SiC微粉和乙醇溶剂为原料,采用先驱体转化工艺制备了2D Cf/Si-O-C复合材料,考察了裂解温度对材料结构和性能的影响。结果表明,首周期裂解温度对制备材料的力学性能有重要影响,纤维-基体间的界面弱化是复合材料力学性能提高的主要原因;第6周期采用合适的温度裂解可提高复合材料的力学性能,其弯曲强度和断裂韧性分别达到了263.9MPa和12.8MPa.m1/2。     

Selling to strategic and loss‐averse consumers: Stocking,procurement, and product design policies

Motivated by the presence of loss‐averse decision making behavior in practice, this article considers a supply chain consisting of a firm and strategic consumers who possess an S‐shaped loss‐averse utility function. In the model, consumers decide the purchase timing and the firm chooses the inventory level. We find that the loss‐averse consumers' strategic purchasing behavior is determined by their perceived gain and loss from strategic purchase delay, and the given rationing risk. Thus, the firm that is cognizant of this property tailors its inventory stocking policy based on the consumers' loss‐averse behavior such as their perceived values of gain and loss, and their sensitivity to them. We also demonstrate that the firm's equilibrium inventory stocking policy reflects both the economic logic of the traditional newsvendor inventory model, and the loss‐averse behavior of consumers. The equilibrium order quantity is significantly different from those derived from models that assume that the consumers are risk neutral and homogeneous in their valuations. We show that the firm that ignores strategic consumer's loss‐aversion behavior tends to keep an unnecessarily high inventory level that leads to excessive leftovers. Our numerical experiments further reveal that in some extreme cases the firm that ignores strategic consumer's loss‐aversion behavior generates almost 92% more leftovers than the firm that possesses consumers’ loss‐aversion information and takes it into account when making managerial decisions. To mitigate the consumer's forward‐looking behavior, we propose the adoption of the practice of agile supply chain management, which possesses the following attributes: (i) procuring inventory after observing real‐time demand information, (ii) enhanced design (which maintains the current production mix but improves the product performance to a higher level), and (iii) customized design (which maintains the current performance level but increases the variety of the current production line to meet consumers’ specific demands). We show that such a practice can induce the consumer to make early purchases by increasing their rationing risk, increasing the product value, or diversifying the product line. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 62: 435–453, 2015     

Inventory financing under Risk-Adjusted-Return-On-Capital criterion

Risk-Adjusted-Return-On-Capital (RAROC) is a loan-pricing criterion under which a bank sets the loan term such that a certain rate of return is achieved on the regulatory capital required by the Basel regulation. Some banks calculate the amount of regulatory capital for each loan under the standardized approach (“standardized banks,” the regulatory capital is proportional to the loan amount), and others under the internal rating-based (IRB) approach (“IRB banks,” the regulatory capital is related to the Value-at-Risk of the loan). This article examines the impact of the RAROC criterion on the bank's loan-pricing decision and the retailer's inventory decision. We find that among the loan terms that satisfy the bank's RAROC criterion, the one that benefits the retailer the most requires the bank to specify an inventory advance rate in addition to the interest rate. Under this loan term, the retailer's inventory level is more sensitive to his asset level when facing an IRB bank compared to a standardized bank. An IRB (standardized) loan leads to higher profit and inventory level for retailers with high (low) asset. For retailers with medium asset, an IRB loan results in a higher retailer profit but a lower consumer welfare. Calibrated numerical study reveals that the benefit of choosing standardized banks (relative to IRB banks) can be as high as 30% for industries with severe capital constraints, volatile demands, and low profit margins, highlighting the importance for retailers to carefully choose the type of banks to borrow from. When the interest rate is capped by regulation, retailers borrowing from a standardized bank are more likely to be influenced by the interest rate cap than those borrowing from an IRB bank. Under strong empire-building incentives (the bank will offer loan terms to maximize the size of the loan), retailers with medium initial asset level shift their preference from IRB banks to standardized banks.