基于系统动力学的部队穿插迂回行动决策

围绕部队穿插迂回行动的两个目标,依据穿插迂回行动过程所具有的多阶段性特征,建立了部队穿插迂回作战行动决策的系统动力学模型,该模型充分考虑了信息化条件下指挥控制、通信网络、后装保障等因素对部队穿插迂回行动的影响,较好地克服了传统建模方法的不足.利用此模型,对某坦克营穿插迂回行动进行了仿真,分析了多种情况下穿插迂回时机和穿插迂回攻击目标的方案选择,为部队穿插迂回行动的正确决策提供了定量依据,说明了该模型的有效性.     

基于集对分析的后勤补给路线决策问题研究

由于现代战争后勤补给的快速性、安全性、决策者的主观性及获取情报信息的相关特性,使后勤补给路线的决策问题具有不确定性.利用集对分析对确定不确定信息的良好处理能力,对后勤补给路线的决策问题进行了研究.在选择路线时摒弃了传统的只考虑时间效益的思路,综合分析影响后勤补给路线选择的诸多因素,在遵循目的性、实用性、关联性、客观性和定量化原则基础之上,构建了后勤补给路线选择的指标体系;给出一种基于集对分析的决策定量化数学模型,对后勤补给路线的决策问题进行分析,为指挥员能够科学、合理地选择路线提供参考.     

网络化多平台协同控制与决策系统总体设计框架

针对单一平台在探测能力和信息获取方面的局限性,提出构建基于空中、地面、水中平台的多平台人机协同控制与决策系统的体系结构,该系统的特点是有人参与决策,可实现有人平台和无人平台的协同。分析了地面指挥控制与决策中心及各平台应具有的功能,并对人机交互软件界面进行了总体设计。给出了一个典型的应用场景,分析了其工作原理及多平台协同跟踪与决策过程,验证了所提系统体系结构的灵活性和合理性。     

熵权正负理想方案灰色关联法的对地攻击目标选择

针对攻击机对地攻击的目标选择问题,提出了目标攻击优先权的计算方法,将正负理想方案与灰色关联分析方法进行融合并引进熵权的思想为各项优先权赋值,避免了权值确定过于主观的问题,提出了一种目标选择的模型,为飞行员对地攻击目标选择提供了辅助决策,具有较高的实用性。仿真结果也说明了该方法的合理性。     

一种用于战场态势分析的决策支持方法

针对战场态势分析过程中存在的关键情报缺失问题,在离散事件系统的模型基础上,总结已有决策支持方法并加以改进,提出一种步进融合算法,构建出新的决策支持系统。采用数学手段及实例验证对所提出方法与已有方法进行性能比较,证明该方法能够有效保证指挥决策的鲁棒性和敏捷性,适用于战场态势分析。     

空陆攻防博弈的动态武器目标分配

大规模作战具有高动态、非完全信息和不确定性,在分析归纳目前解决动态武器目标分配问题的一系列方法的基础上,尝试构建基于双方动态博弈的攻防对抗综合数学模型,并利用纳什均衡和帕累托最优算法进行分阶段求解。结果表明,该数学模型和博弈论方法结合能够有效解决武器目标动态分配问题。     

状态可靠性的装备视情维修决策分析

针对连续劣化的多设备系统在不同劣化水平下都可能发生失效,依据设备实际劣化状态评定可靠性的思想,提出运用状态可靠性理论刻画设备或部件的劣化水平与随机故障之间的关系,可对设备实际劣化状态进行可靠性评定,适用于表征同类设备或部件的不同个体在不同的工作负荷和工作环境下经历不同的劣化过程后的不同可靠性指标,反映了连续劣化系统的随...     

谈处置恐怖劫持人质事件中指挥员的应急决策

＂人质事件＂的应急处置策略、过程和结果,不仅关系着人质的安全与利益,也直接影响到政府的反恐政策及立场、能力与施政水平,关系到政府在民众心目中的权威、地位和形象。处置恐怖劫持人质事件中现场指挥员面临着巨大的压力和挑战。能否采取武力强攻以及何时采取武力强攻,是指挥员运筹决策的关键点,权衡利弊、对比分析,按照＂两害相权取其轻、两利相权取其重＂的原则,进行量化评估,寻求最佳方案。     

‘Calmly critical’: Evolving Russian views of US hegemony

Russia has consistently opposed US hegemony since the early 1990s. Moscow has sought to create a world overseen by the UN Security Council and several power centres supporting an anti-hegemonic axis. Until recently, Russia's resources have been very limited. Russian opposition therefore was largely conceptual or a work in progress. Russian policy was largely reactive – and non-confrontational. However, the failure of the Russia-US relationship to develop practically has highlighted negative views of US hegemony, and the greater wealth generated through high energy prices is supporting an increasingly active Russian policy.     

A best practice for assessment in counterinsurgency

In September 2011, the Commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan directed the Afghan Assessment Group to redesign the way in which ISAF was assessing the status of the war, and to be ‘revolutionary’ in so doing. The resulting assessment paradigm was novel, non-doctrinal, and effectively addressed the unique complexities of the counterinsurgency in Afghanistan and the needs of the ISAF Commander. It had a two-tier structure consisting of both strategic and campaign assessments. The former focused on answering a set of strategic questions in narrative, analytic form to address the strategic environment, while the latter used a set of standards and accompanying narrative responses to gauge accomplishment of campaign tasks. Both tiers captured the current state of the war while maintaining an eye on future challenges and opportunities. The two assessments and their associated processes were designed to stimulate discussions leading directly to decisions by senior leaders on actions they could take, direct, or request. While any assessment paradigm will have advantages and disadvantages, an examination of the pros and cons of this assessment paradigm makes clear that it should be considered a ‘best practice’ in the field of counterinsurgency assessment.