On optimal aiming to hit a linear target

Typically weapon systems have an inherent systematic error and a random error for each round, centered around its mean point of impact. The systematic error is common to all aimings. Assume such a system for which there is a preassigned amount of ammunition of n rounds to engage a given target simultaneously, and which is capable of administering their fire with individual aiming points (allowing “offsets”). The objective is to determine the best aiming points for the system so as to maximize the probability of hitting the target by at least one of the n rounds. In this paper we focus on the special case where the target is linear (one‐dimensional) and there are no random errors. We prove that as long as the aiming error is symmetrically distributed and possesses one mode at zero, the optimal aiming is independent of the particular error distribution, and we specify the optimal aiming points. Possible extensions are further discussed, as well as civilian applications in manufacturing, radio‐electronics, and detection. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 46: 323–333, 1999     

信息系统体系作战弹药保障能力评估

弹药信息化是武器装备信息化的重要组成部分,直接影响战斗力的生成。如何分析、评估保障单位在信息系统体系作战弹药信息化保障能力的建设水平,对我军信息化建设至关重要。在分析影响弹药信息化保障能力形成的主要因素的基础上,构建了符合我军弹药信息化保障能力特点的评估指标体系,提出了一种基于主成分和集对分析法综合分析的基于信息系统体系作战弹药信息化保障能力评估方法,通过该方法可求得指标权重,最终获得被评估单位弹药信息化保障能力的整体建设水平。结合实例分析,验证构建的评估模型能够用于我军基于信息系统体系作战弹药信息化保障能力的评估,进一步为如何提高弹药信息化保障能力提供技术指导。     

关于图的距离Irredundance数

G=(V,E)是简单连通图,用G—v表示从G中删除v以及与v相关联的边所得到的图,ir_n(G)表示G的n—irredundance数,证明了下列不等式: ir_n(G—v)≥(ir_n(G) 1)/2这个结果推广了Favaron的相应结论。     

基于直觉模糊集的ELECTRE方法

结合直觉模糊集的信息表达优势和ELECTRE方法的思想,提出了一种直觉模糊多属性决策的新方法。利用直觉模糊熵对直觉模糊信息价值的刻画,构建了熵权与专家权重的组合权重。阐述了直觉模糊ELECTRE方法的决策原理和步骤,并经过实例应用,验证了该方法的可行性与有效性。     

模块化油料装备单元新型连接接头设计

模块化油料装备具有运用方式灵活、功能模块扩展能力强的优点,既能使油料装备的保障能力显著增强,又方便设计、制造、使用和维修,但各模块单元之间不易实现干式快速连接与分离。为实现油料装备模块单元快速连接、拆卸且无油料漏出,创新设计一种干式快速自封连接接头。该接头用于油料装备模块单元连接时,管路系统能自动接通;各模块单元分离时,管路系统能自动封闭,使各模块单元或组合体形成一个密封体,始终无漏油现象。该干式快速自封连接接头用于模块单元连接或分离,具有简便、快捷且无油料渗出等特点。     

Damage functions and estimates of fratricide and collateral damage

There are multiple damage functions in the literature to estimate the probability that a single weapon detonation destroys a point target. This paper addresses differences in the tails of four of the more popular damage functions. These four cover the asymptotic tail behaviors of all monotonically decreasing damage functions with well‐behaved hazard functions. The differences in estimates of probability of kill are quite dramatic for large aim‐point offsets. This is particularly important when balancing the number of threats that can be engaged with the chances of fratricide and collateral damage. In general, analysts substituting one damage function for another may badly estimate kill probabilities in offset‐aiming, which could result in poor doctrine. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 50: 306–321, 2003.     

基于集对-层次分析法的合成部队作战能力分析

为科学评估合成部队战斗力水平,在准确量化作战行动的基础上,设计定义了39个作战能力最小数据集,抽象出快速反应、情报侦察、指挥控制等11种专题作战能力评价体系。以该标准采集的数据为样本, 运用集对-层次分析法实现了合成部队作战能力的综合评估。最后以火力打击能力评估模型为例,验证了该方法的有效性实用性。