使用与维修工作分析与保障资源需求确定

详细描述了使用与维修工作分析、保障设备需求确定、备品备件需求确定、技术资料内容确定、人员与技术等级需求确定的主要内容及使用与维修工作分析与保障资源需求确定之间的关系,为在研制阶段确定出保障资源提供一种科学而适用的方法.     

影响武器装备维修质量的基本要素分析

制约、影响维修质量的因素是多方面的.从武器装备系统的全寿命过程出发,将影响维修质量的基本要素概括为7个方面即维修人员素质、维修设备与设施的状况、装配工艺、维修生产环境、原材料、备品备件的质量、维修管理制度等.通过具体研究、分析影响维修质量的这些因素及其特征量,指明这是实现维修质量管理和评定目标的必经之路,只有影响因素明确了,才能有的放矢地对维修质量进行管理、控制与评定.     

近地快速交会调相策略设计与任务分析

基于我国2天交会对接方案,通过合理减少定轨、变轨参数计算与指令上传及不可测控区域占用的飞行圈次,建立了5圈快速交会对接的调相变轨方案,采用四脉冲修正特殊点变轨算法进行求解。给出了满足调相段终端控制精度所需要的定轨精度,分析了追踪航天器入轨精度、追踪航天器入轨远地点高度、目标轨道高度、调相段终端瞄准点等参数对最优初始相位角范围的影响规律。简要分析了为获得需要的初始相位角,目标航天器的调相策略及追踪航天器可能的发射机会。     

前苏联发展反卫星武器的回顾

随着军用卫星的种类变化和性能提高 ,以及为谋求外层空间作战的军事优势 ,前苏联一直在积极发展反卫星武器。介绍了前苏联反卫星武器的组成、特点、技术方案及其发展情况 ,最后归纳了关于前苏联反卫星武器的几点看法。     

紧固件自动拆装过程仿真的设计方法研究

介绍了一种在AUTOCAD环境下,用参数化造型法,实现紧固件拆装过程自动仿真的设计方法.该方法把维修工具及紧固件的设计、工具维修性力学分析,以及维修过程的图形仿真合成在一起.工具及紧固件可以在给定点自动实现三维造型,并可连续进行过程仿真;当施加在紧固件上的外力超过其规定的受力范围时,将以图形方式自动显示,帮助操作者对维修操作过程进行判断.     

基于仿真的装备维修保障力量配置优化

装备维修保障力量的优化配置对于充分发挥维修保障效益、提高装备完好率具有重要意义。在分析界定装备维修保障力量配置问题的基础上,采用通用仿真语言建立了支持分析决策的仿真模型。实例分析表明维修力量最优配置是各区域的故障装备产生速率、后送运输时间等方面因素综合作用的结果,仿真程序可反映各项因素的定量关系。     

战略决策模拟中的态势表现

战略决策模拟中,态势表现是实现模拟可视化的关键,具有举足轻重的作用,其研究与实现是一项具有相当难度的课题.首先分析战略态势表现所要解决的两个基本问题,即态势数据和可视化表现;其次着眼于两者的分离,按照面向对象的设计思想,提出了一种面向对象的战略态势表现实现思路;最后,给出了开发战略态势表现系统的基本工作思路.在决胜系列战略决策模拟系统的开发中,按照该思路实现了态势表现子系统,较好的满足了模拟需求.     

The poverty of power in military power: how collective power could benefit strategic studies

Strategic studies deals intimately with the topic of power. Most scholars in the discipline work with a concept of power as an adversarial zero-sum competition. This is natural and necessary. However, other conceptions of power developed within political science and sociology could enrich strategic studies. Approaching two typical, traditional tasks of strategy – alliance building and war-fighting – this article demonstrates the heuristic mileage of theories of collective power. In particular, we can shed new light on the post-Cold War transformation of NATO as well as state-building as a strategy in counter-insurgencies with new ideas of power. Broadening the palette of theories of power is thus valuable if strategic studies is to prosper as an independent field of study.     

Hybrid warfare through the lens of strategic theory

Hybrid warfare is the latest of the terms/concepts that have been used within the defence community in the last three decades to label contemporary warfare. It has been officially adopted in the core strategic documents of NATO, EU and national governments and has already inspired many articles, policy papers and books; however, this paper is unique in the sense that it analysis the hybrid warfare concept through the lens of strategic theory. It is argued that hybrid warfare does not merit the adoption as a doctrinal concept. Strategic theory instead, which lies at the nexus of all dimensions of warfare, provides a better viewpoint to approach contemporary warfare. It concludes that efforts should be directed towards exploring warfare under the light of eternal principles instead of proving the emergence of new types of warfare.     

The rise and fall of counterproliferation policy

The US government initiated a Defense Counterproliferation Initiative to address the concern that, in the post-Cold War years, the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons would be widespread and create a significant challenge to the US military’s combat operations. In particular, non-nuclear states might use chemical or biological warfare agents against US forces with the belief that nuclear weapons would not be used against them in retaliation. Following the events of September 11, 2001, defense strategy and policy shifted to a wider view of the threat of adversarial use of “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD) and the term “counterproliferation” was replaced by “combating” or “countering WMD.” Over time, the Defense Department increasingly moved away from counterproliferation principles with the detrimental effect of losing capabilities that US forces still need for contemporary adversaries. This shift has been aggravated by other US government agencies’ use of “counterproliferation” in lieu of what would have been termed “nonproliferation” activities in the 1990s. The loss of clarity within the US government on these terms has led to the inability to focus the “whole of government” on this significant national security challenge. To alleviate this challenge, the US government needs a top-down initiative to refocus policy on the distinctly different aspects of WMD with respect to military combat operations, combating terrorism, and homeland security.