防空群掩护固定目标兵力区分模型构建

兵力区分是防空兵战斗部署的重要环节。传统的区分方法过于笼统,同时针对性不强。对防空群掩护固定目标时兵力区分的原则、方法和程序进行了探讨,并按照目标重要程度排序空袭兵力需求分析防空兵力需求分析兵力分配的思路建立了防空群兵力区分的数理模型。     

Effective attacks in the salvo combat model: Salvo sizes and quantities of targets

This article considers two related questions of tactics in the context of the salvo model for naval missile combat. For a given set of targets, how many missiles should be fired to produce an effective attack? For a given available salvo size, how many enemy targets should be fired at? In the deterministic version of the model I derive a simple optimality relationship between the number of missiles to fire and the number of targets to engage. In the stochastic model I employ the expected loss inflicted and the probability of enemy elimination as the main performance measures and use these to derive salvo sizes that are in some sense “optimal.” I find that the offensive firepower needed for an effective attack depends not only on a target's total strength but also on the relative balance between its active defensive power and passive staying power. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007     

陆军部队装备建设效能评估体系研究

以部队在编武器装备为基本研究对象,着眼系统功能的形成,选定了陆军部队类型,构建了评估指标体系;运用定性与定量相结合的方法,建立了相应的效能指标量化模型,进行了指标的数据耦合分析,并展望了陆军部队武器装备建设效能评估结论的可能应用。     

军事院校校园空间环境与特色的创造——后勤工程学院新校区概念性规划设计

军事院校担负着培养和造就高素质新型军事人才的使命,军事院校校园空间环境应有自己鲜明的特色.着重介绍了后勤工程学院新校区概念性规划设计方案的主要思想,提出了尊重自然环境条件,创建生态化、园林式的校园环境;尊重地域文化,体现历史传承和军校特色的设计理念.力求创造一个以人为本,能体现当代军事校园精神风貌的场所和空间环境,创建一种可持续发展的校园规划建设模式.     

信息化战争环境下的军事装备管理系统组织重构设想

针对信息化战争环境下对军事装备管理系统的新需求,提出了军事装备管理系统组织结构设计的原则,分析了军事装备管理系统组织结构的3种基本类型。在此基础上,依据需求,在探讨了军事装备管理系统重构原则的前提下,进行了军事装备管理系统重构设想,为军事装备管理系统组织变革提供前瞻性的指导。     

对学历教育型军队院校应突出军事特色的几点思考

随着世界新军事变革的浪潮扑面而来,我军以完成机械化、信息化双重历史任务为己任,军队院校对新型军事人才的培养发生了深刻的变革,机遇与挑战并存.我院作为学历教育型军队院校,重点是培养"合训分流"模式人才.为此,文章首先阐述学历教育型军队院校在人才培养上必须突出军事特色的现实意义和紧迫性,同时又对突出军事特色的主要做法进行了思考.     

Spies,advisors, and grunts: Film portrayals of counterinsurgency in Vietnam

Vietnam was a complex conflict, which historians and political scientists have struggled to understand. Some of the bitterest disputes in the historiography revolve around the US approach to counterinsurgency in Vietnam. Many different facets of the war have received the attention of filmmakers, and an examination of their work suggests new ways of thinking about the conflict. This article considers film portrayals of three phases of the Vietnam War – firstly, the early period of ‘political action’, then the advisory period, and finally the Americanization of the war after 1965. It suggests that by examining the experiences of participants in each of these phases, Vietnam War cinema helps to illustrate the problems that faced various American approaches to counterinsurgency in the conflict. Combined with the importance of films in determining popular perceptions of both historical conflicts and counterinsurgency in general, it suggests that they are worthy subjects of study and critique.     

军事情报价值的当量评估法

研究了军事情报价值的综合性和相对性,提出了军事情报价值评估的当量分析法,分别针对确定性标度和模糊标度结合层次分析法给出了评估算法。算例结果表明方法有一定的合理性且评价结论易于理解。     

基于粗糙集理论的军队代储应急物资品种选择

从军队对应急物资的需求特点及应急物资的特征属性出发,构建了军队代储应急物资品种选择的指标体系。在此基础上,通过部队调研和专家经验获得了一组军队代储应急物资品种选择的样本数据并形成了决策表,运用基于可辨识矩阵的属性频率约简算法对决策表进行属性约简,并对约简属性集进行属性值约简,提取出军队代储应急物资品种的选择规则。提取的规则简洁合理,能够为军队代储应急物资品种选择提供决策支持。     

US strategic preferences in the early twenty-first century

This article investigates how US national security planners have envisioned the emerging strategic environment during the early twenty-first century and evaluates how their perceptions of this strategic environment have changed during these years. This conceptual evolution can be seen in how defense planners define threats, identify defense priorities, and design security strategies. Five key strategic planning documents serve as the basis for this analysis and illustrate significant shifts in how the US government has envisioned its own security requirements as well as the context within which its strategic vision will need to be realized. These planning documents are: (1) Joint Vision 2020, (2) the Bush Administration's 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States, (3) the Obama Administration's 2010 National Security Strategy, (4) US Strategic Defense Guidance entitled Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21^st Century Defense, and (5) the US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Capstone Concept for Joint Operations: Joint Force 2020.