现代防空火控系统的现状及发展方向

参照国外现代陆用防空火控系统现状 ,结合国内陆用防空火控系统研制情况 ,以功能模块概念阐述现代陆用防空火控系统的组成及各组成分系统的功能。结合近代反空袭作战特点 ,探讨未来陆用防空火控系统的发展方向     

民族自决权──列宁处理民族问题的一个基本原则

民族自决权理论是马克思主义处理民族问题的一个基本原则。列宁在领导俄国革命的过程中,进一 步丰富和发展了马克思主义的民族自决权理论,为巩固无产阶级政权,建立社会主义制度发挥了重要作用。正确 认识列宁的民族自决权理论,对我们当前解决民族问题,反对民族分裂,维护祖国统一,具有重要的现实意义。     

防空兵作战指挥对抗能力评估方法

作战指挥对抗在未来防空作战中的地位越来越重要,为科学评估防空兵作战指挥对抗能力,对防空兵作战指挥对抗系统进行了全面分析,建立了防空兵作战指挥对抗能力评估指标体系.并利用模糊数学的方法,建立该系统的模糊综合评价模型,从而为综合评估防空兵作战指挥对抗能力提供了一种方法.该方法能使定性描述定量化,客观地反映了防空兵作战指挥对抗能力的真实情况,具有一定的参考价值.     

基于多属性决策方法的防空C3I系统效能评估

介绍了防空C3I系统效能的定义及效能评估的一般处理过程.针对效能指标的多样性,提出了基于多属性决策(MADM)的效能评估方法,并通过一个示例给出MADM方法的处理过程,有效地解决了防空C3I系统效能评估这一复杂而困难的问题,仿真结果证明了方法的可行性.     

油料装备信息化模式的系统构想

简述了油料装备信息化的意义和内涵,提出了由基础层、系统层和决策层等3 层构成的油料装备信息化模式的系统构想;分析了系统各部分的组成及功能,指出在3个层次之间进行信息的采集和传输的接入技术和网络技术是实现油料装备信息化的关键支撑技术;阐明了油料装备信息化模式的主要基础支撑技术,并对相关系统进行了说明。     

俄罗斯空天防御教学训练设备发展与问题研究

俄罗斯按照建设航天力量的需求,积极研究现代空天防御教学技术设备。俄罗斯空天防御教学训练设备可帮助受训者利用所获得的知识与能力,在准备和完成实践任务时在不同系统设备间实现不同级别的综合协同,将实现结构和软件的模块化。俄航天兵使用空天防御教学训练设备的经验对军队空天防御专业人员训练具有重要的借鉴意义。本文分析了俄罗斯空天防御教学训练设备现状,研究了朱可夫空天防御军事学院一体化空天防御自动化控制系统教学试验模型的构成、原理、作用和应用,总结了俄罗斯空天防御教学训练设备在国家标准、教学法、工效学和组织方面存在的主要问题及解决办法,以期为军队空天防御教学训练设备发展提供参考。     

加速无人化装备技术发展的思考

随着人工智能、云计算及大数据等新技术的快速发展及其在军事领域的广泛渗透,智能化无人化装备的应用领域不断拓展、型谱体系日渐完善、作战能力显著提升,已成为世界各主要军事强国聚力发展的新质力量。本文从作战体系、系统平台和支撑技术等三个方面对主要军事强国无人化装备技术的现状进行了分析总结,并在此基础上对无人化装备的技术发展趋势进行了研判,指出无人化装备技术呈现出成体系、成系列、成规模的发展总体格局,正朝着集群化、实战化和自主智能决策的方向发展。在此基础上,充分借鉴外军先进经验,紧密结合军事斗争准备需求,提出了发展军队无人化装备技术的基本思路、主要原则和具体举措,积极探索适合军队特点和规律的无人化装备技术发展道路。     

Small footprint,small payoff: The military effectiveness of security force assistance

After 15 years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, many now see ‘small-footprint’ security force assistance (SFA) – training, advising and equipping allied militaries – as an alternative to large US ground-force commitments. Yet, its actual military efficacy has been little studied. This paper seeks to fill this gap. We find important limitations on SFA’s military utility, stemming from agency problems arising from systematic interest misalignment between the US and its typical partners. SFA’s achievable upper bound is modest and attainable only if US policy is intrusive and conditional, which it rarely is. For SFA, small footprints will usually mean small payoffs.     

Effective in battle: conceptualizing soldiers’ combat effectiveness*

How do we understand combat effectiveness – soldiers’ performance in battle? Despite the broad consensus that understanding combat effectiveness is important both for scholars and policymakers, there is widespread disagreement about what combat effectiveness is. More specifically, studies of effectiveness tend to focus on either the skill of soldiers in battle, or their will to fight. Yet both skill and will are essential components of an effective fighting force. This article argues that understanding combat effectiveness requires understanding both of these key components of effectiveness. In other words, combat effectiveness requires both the skill and will to engage the enemy in an organized manner. It then demonstrates the usefulness of this conceptualization by applying it to the cases of British, Indian, and Australian forces fighting the Japanese during the Second World War. Only when scholars are talking about the same concept will our understanding of the conditions under which militaries are effective in battle progress. By comparing different units fighting the same opponent under the same material conditions, I demonstrate that units vary both in their combat skill and their will to fight, and that understanding their effectiveness in battle requires analyzing both of these key factors.     

Does military spending stimulate growth? An empirical investigation in Italy

This paper investigates the effect of military burden on economic growth and extends previous works on the optimal size of government expenditure by exploring how external threat affects the preferences of the households and, in turn, economic growth. Post World War II Italian data are used to estimate nonlinear growth models using time-series semi-parametric methods. The estimates show that total government and civilian burdens are productive, whereas, military burden has significant effects on economic growth through the expenditure for peacekeeping missions, which reduces the insecurity in the home country. This may justify economically the current not negligible budget devoted to peacekeeping and humanitarian missions.