基于Multi-Agent仿真模型的非对称作战有效性分析*

针对多要素在非对称作战中运用的复杂影响,建立了基于Multi-Agent的仿真模型,对非时称作战的有效性进行了数学解释;给出了Multi-Agent的系统结构,在EINSTein仿真平台中设置了指挥决策Agent、态势感知Agent、通信协作Agent和作战行动Agent,以此模拟作战要素在非时称作战中运用的主要功能,进而演示非对称作战的过程,获得非对称作战的仿真实验数据;仿真模型描述了多要素影响下作战体系的突变现象;通过作战目的的实现和高倍增的作战效果,实证了仿真模型的有效性和可行性.     

线性二次型及模型预测控制编队控制研究

多智能体集群作战是未来战场的重要形式.作为集群作战中的关键技术,编队控制有着广泛的应用.以编队控制律为研究目标,选择2种优化控制方法:线性二次型调节器(linear quadratic regulator,LQR)方法和模型预测控制(model predictive control,MPC)方法.针对圆形编队轨迹,采用...     

现代战争心理战高科技运用探析

随着世界新军事变革的蓬勃发展,心理战这一传统的斗争方式也呈现出一系列崭新的特征.现代技术的飞速发展和广泛运用,极大拓展了心理战的作战领域和影响范围.高技术局部战争的实践已经充分表明,战争胜负对心理战的依赖日趋明显,心理战已逐渐成为一种能够适应国际斗争需要并在维护国家安全方面发挥作用的战略行动.本文以海湾战争、伊拉克战争...     

效力准则的电子战干扰效果度量的研究

探讨了舰载电子战系统干扰效果的度量准则,分析了压制干扰对反舰导弹的单发命中概率的影响,从研究系统射击效力指标的角度出发,提出一种新的评定舰载电子战干扰效果的准则——效力准则。并通过算例得出典型情况下系统施放压制性干扰时机与反舰导弹单发命中概率之间的关系。     

网络中心战与网格技术

在当前的世界新军事变革中,网络中心战和军事信息网格是两个极重要的、具有发展趋向性的概念。本文阐述了"网络中心战"是军事需求牵引和技术推动的产物,以及美军网络中心战和 全球信息网格的内涵,并对应用网格技术建设我海军信息网格,实现我海军综合电子信息系统一体化进行了初步探讨。     

网络中心战概念及其空战应用研究

介绍了网络中心战的基本概念和基本结构,分析了网络中心战的理论假设,技术要求和它的特点;并研究了网络中心战在空战中的应用问题。研究显示网络中心战对提高信息的利用和飞机的作战效能是十分有效的。网络中心战指出了一种在信息时代完成作战任务的思路,网络中心战将是世界各国未来战略计划的基石。     

太空战及其对未来作战的影响

详细地叙述了太空战以及太空战对未来战争的影响。谁占据了太空,谁就能控制全球。太空战的出现将对未来的军事作战理论、武器装备的发展及技术走向产生深远的影响。     

非军事领域对战争制胜机理的影响

随着新型技术在军事领域的标准化建设和体系化运用,以往大兵团正面交锋的作战场景正在渐渐淡出历史舞台。战争规模变得更加可控,战争样式变得更加难以预测。究其原因,非军事领域因素对战争规模、样式的影响在增加,给信息化作战制胜机理带来了新的变化。     

The danger of “hybrid warfare” from a sophisticated adversary: the Russian “hybridity” in the Ukrainian conflict

The term “hybrid warfare” is a new one that the West began to use to explain its failure to cope with asymmetric threats. Focusing on the war on global terrorism, the West temporarily withdrew its attention from traditional adversaries, such as Russia, which has used this gap and has audaciously returned to the stage as a global actor. Until the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and inflaming the Ukrainian crisis, most Western authors attributed “hybrid threats” mostly to non-state actors. But the Ukrainian scenario showed the true face of “hybridity” in the modern battlefield when practised by a powerful state actor. Russian “hybrid warfare” in Ukraine has already been seen as a combination of conventional and unconventional methods, that have been complemented with other instruments of national power – diplomatic, economic and information. The purpose of this article is, through an analysis of the Ukrainian scenario, to demonstrate that although the term “hybrid” is new, the concept itself is old and is a continuation of already seen doctrine from the Cold War era. Although “hybrid threats” can come both from state and non-state actors, the Russian interference in Ukraine is proof that they are especially dangerous for the West if, or when, they are initiated from a traditional, sophisticated adversary that has the capacity to use all forms of warfare.     

Postmodern warfare and the blurred boundaries between war and peace

Each age has its own wars and its own forms of warfare. In today’s evolving world risk society warfare has entered a new development stage. The states of the “global North” adapt their forms of intervention. They increasingly practice postmodern warfare characterized especially by the role of influencing the information space, networked approaches, the incorporation of indirect and covert actions, and the special quality of new technologies. This practice furthers an increasing grey zone between limiting and de-bounding of warfare. The phenomenon of postmodern warfare raises some tough questions and offers a rich research agenda.