基于复杂网络的武器装备体系贡献度评估分析方法

根据结构决定功能的系统论观点,基于复杂网络理论对武器装备作战体系网络的拓扑结构进行了分析,构建了基于不确定性自信息量的武器装备作战体系作战效能分析模型,提出了计算武器装备体系贡献度的方法,并通过算例验证,探讨了网络结构演化及度量参数改变对武器装备体系贡献度的影响,为武器装备体系贡献度评估分析提供了技术支撑。     

基于云模型和FAHP熵权的空地弹药效能评估

准确、科学地评估空地弹药的作战效能,对武器装备的设计、研制、试验、采购、作战使用及维护具有重要的意义。充分利用云模型可将定性指标的模糊性和随机性有效结合的特点,构建了空地弹药作战效能的综合云评估模型。针对现有确定指标权重的方法存在主观性较强的不足,提出一种基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)熵权的权重确定方法,有效利用了主观信息和客观信息。实例分析表明该模型可准确、客观、有效地评估空地弹药的作战效能。     

应用新型Lanchester方程的非对称空战进程预测

针对未来空战中可能出现的非对称空战问题进行研究,在设定的非对称空战背景下构建新型Lanchester方程对问题进行建模分析,得到单一机种和多兵种非对称空战模型,并通过仿真试验验证了模型的有效性,对非对称空战指挥决策提供了一定的帮助。     

装备体系核心保障能力分析

明确了装备体系和核心保障能力的概念内涵。针对核心保障能力的评价问题,从评价参数和评价方法两个方面入手,系统整理了国内外开展关于核心保障能力的问题特点和研究进展,总结了现有研究成果,通过对照比较,指出了现有研究中存在的不足之处。在此基础上,从装备体系核心保障能力评价问题的外军研究成果、基础理论、系统分析和保障仿真技术4个方面,提出了后续的研究建议,对于相关科研人员具有参考和借鉴意义。     

基于模糊AHP的武警分队处突效能评估

当前国内局势不太稳定,武警部队作为处置突发事件的主要力量,必须随时做好战备工作。通过分析影响武警分队处突效能的主要因素,建立了武警分队处突效能评估指标体系,给出评估模型。利用层次分析法AHP(The Analytic Hierarchy Process)确定各指标的权重,应用专家打分法确定单因素评判矩阵,最后运用模糊综合评判模型对某武警分队处突效能进行评估。评估结果与处突分队现实表现能力相一致。该方法不仅可以为首长机关在处突时提供决策支持,而且还可以根据评估结果对该分队的短板进行针对性训练,提高战斗力。     

一种改进的机载反辐射导弹作战效能评估方法

大气波导对反辐射导弹作战效能将产生一定的影响。根据机载反辐射导弹攻击水面目标的作战流程确定评估指标,基于传统的概率评估方法,引入大气波导影响因子,建立一种改进的大气波导条件下机载反辐射导弹作战效能模型。应用实例表明在大气波导条件下反辐射导弹的作战效能有所提升,符合大气波导对反辐射导弹作战能力产生有利影响的实际情况,验证了该模型的有效性和实用性,为机载反辐射导弹作战效能评估提供了一种新的方法和途径。     

基于组合赋权法的联合作战协同效能评估指标

针对联合作战协同效能评估指标体系不够科学和权重计算方法比较单一的问题,立足联合作战协同的本质特性和作战协同效能评估尺度,通过维度映射构建了包括整体性、精确性、时效性、灵活性和稳定性等5个一级指标、作战行动有序性、力量优势互补程度等10个二级指标的联合作战协同效能评估指标体系。通过构建离差最小组合赋权模型给出了主客观赋权合成的方法,并结合指标体系权重计算验证了方法可行性。     

要地防空敌袭主攻方向判断方法研究

主要对要地防空时多个可能的敌空袭兵器来袭方向进行了分析,并确定每个来袭方向的综合评价指标。应用模糊层次分析法建立多层次的评价指标体系,确立被评事物对各等级模糊子集的隶属度。应用灰色关联理论消除各个因素之间的量纲和数量级差异,将综合运算得到的量值进行排序比较,以供指挥员进行战场情况判断。     

The correlates of transatlantic burden sharing: revising the agenda for theoretical and policy analysis

While recent work has attempted to update the research agenda for transatiantic defense burden-sharing, there remain significant gaps between the public choice defense economics literature and the security studies literature. The presence of such a gap is unfortunate, because defense spending choices are likely shaped by factors identified by the public choice literature, as well as the strategic and cultural variables that the security studies literature tends to focus on, as well as domestic macroeconomic factors. The independent variables identified in recent qualitative literature are extremely useful analytically, and, fortunately, they have reasonable proxies in available quantitative data, which enables scholars to study them across large groups of countries and many years. This article builds upon such work to synthesize the most notable of the factors identified in the current literature, and offers some common analytical ground that will benefit both scholars and practitioners..     

“Effing” the military: a political misunderstanding of management

The use of commercial business management techniques is widespread in all government departments, including the Ministry of Defence. This article examines the use of popular management techniques in the Armed Forces and argues that their application is misplaced. It looks at what the “effs” – “efficiency” and “effectiveness” – mean in the business world and to the Armed Forces. It compares the definitions both in business and the Armed Forces and finds that there are few, if any, situations where the same measurements can be applied. Whilst many management techniques are suited for business, the function of the Armed Forces and its output cannot be measured in the same way, complicated by the different metrics of “efficiency” in peace and in war. This difference may not be clearly understood by some politicians, or indeed by some senior military personnel. Using examples from some of the most popular management techniques such as “Lean” and “Agile” it is possible to see that their use might actually diminish the capabilities of the Armed Forces when it comes to performing their principal role – the use of force to achieve political objectives.