多属性模糊决策对舰炮射击目标优选

舰炮在现代高科技条件下海战中承担着重要的作战使命和任务,它能否完成被赋予的作战使命和任务,射击目标的优选起着决定性作用.为解决舰炮射击目标优选、决策问题,研究分析了多属性模糊决策方法,以及影响舰炮射击目标优选的因素,提出了多属性模糊决策方法的数学模型和求解最优射击目标排序的新方法.该方法在舰炮射击目标优选中的应用实例表明:通过定量和定性相结合,专家判断和信息处理相结合的多属性模糊决策方法对舰炮射击目标优选、决策具有一定的借鉴意义.     

A sequential partial information bomber-defender shooting problem

A bomber carrying homogenous weapons sequentially engages ground targets capable of retaliation. Upon reaching a target, the bomber may fire a weapon at it. If the target survives the direct fire, it can either return fire or choose to hold fire (play dead). If the former occurs, the bomber is immediately made aware that the target is alive. If no return fire is seen, the true status of the target is unknown to the bomber. After the current engagement, the bomber, if still alive, can either re-engage the same target or move on to the next target in the sequence. The bomber seeks to maximize the expected cumulative damage it can inflict on the targets. We solve the perfect and partial information problems, where a target always fires back and sometimes fires back respectively using stochastic dynamic programming. The perfect information scenario yields an appealing threshold based bombing policy. Indeed, the marginal future reward is the threshold at which the control policy switches and furthermore, the threshold is monotonic decreasing with the number of weapons left with the bomber and monotonic nondecreasing with the number of targets left in the mission. For the partial information scenario, we show via a counterexample that the marginal future reward is not the threshold at which the control switches. In light of the negative result, we provide an appealing threshold based heuristic instead. Finally, we address the partial information game, where the target can choose to fire back and establish the Nash equilibrium strategies for a representative two target scenario.     

建立维和警察心理调控机制之我见

联合国维和警察是一个特殊的职业群体,所处的工作和生活环境艰苦、恶劣、危险。维和警察面对这种超出常规的精神压力,出现各种各样的心理问题是必然的。维和警察的心理问题仅仅依靠维和警察个人自我调节是远远不够的,必须建立一套有效的调控机制来预防和治疗其心理问题,维护好他们的心理健康。     

装备预防性维修的维修级别逻辑决策分析方法

针对预防性维修的维修级别没有规范、统一的分析与确定方法的问题,研究了预防性维修的维修级别逻辑决策分析方法。明确了预防性维修的维修级别决策分析的对象是预防性维修工作类型,预防性维修主要有定时维修和状态维修,定时维修分为定时拆修和定时报废2种维修工作类型,状态维修分为状态信息检测、状态识别、状态预测、维修决策、故障诊断和维修实施等维修工作类型。根据维修间隔期、维修能力评估、其它非经济性因素以及经济性分析,分别建立了定时维修和状态维修的维修级别逻辑决策模型。     

基于理想解法的空中加油机驻地分配选择

一体化联合作战条件下,跨战区、跨军兵种实施空中加油将更加频繁,空中加油机驻地分配选择对空中加油任务的实施有重要影响。分析了影响空中加油机驻地分配选择的主要因素,以此确定决策指标,这是一个多指标综合评价问题。基于理想解法的原理和方法,构建了空中加油机驻地分配选择决策的数学模型。通过示例分析表明,该方法计算简单,较好地解决了空中加油机驻地分配选择问题,并可在此基础上做进一步研究,为实际应用中解决类似问题提供了一种新思路。     

合成分队动态武器目标分配协同决策模型

针对合成分队地面作战特点,提出了一种动态武器目标分配的协同决策模型,该模型基于一种自适应决策中心的协同决策体系结构,以战场信息共享为核心,实现动态火力协同优化分配。提出了针对战场应急目标的一种快速火力分配方法,提高火力整体打击效率的火力适度分配优化方法,适应战场态势动态变化的anytime终止控制方法。仿真实例表明,该模型能够满足合成分队火力动态分配的需求,提高动态武器目标分配决策的合理性和科学性。     

复杂目标毁伤效果评估关键问题分析

复杂目标毁伤效果评估一直是毁伤效果评估中的重难点问题,作为作战指挥决策的重要依据,对其关键问题进行分析和研究具有重要现实意义。首先总结和梳理复杂目标毁伤效果评估的基本思路,在此基础上归纳出复杂目标毁伤效果评估的一般步骤,并构建毁伤效果评估的基本框架,明确其中的关键环节和问题,并基于现有复杂目标毁伤效果评估的方法和模型对其进行详细的论述和分析,最后指明未来发展的方向。     

空空协同作战指挥控制系统

论述了研究与发展空空协同作战指挥系统的必要性 ,探讨了空空协同作战指挥系统的概念及系统的建模、结构模式 ,指挥决策的制定与优化、人机关系的处理、作战效能的评估与通讯共享集等几个问题     

基于多属性决策方法的防空C3I系统效能评估

介绍了防空C3I系统效能的定义及效能评估的一般处理过程.针对效能指标的多样性,提出了基于多属性决策(MADM)的效能评估方法,并通过一个示例给出MADM方法的处理过程,有效地解决了防空C3I系统效能评估这一复杂而困难的问题,仿真结果证明了方法的可行性.     

The Enfield Lock Barrel Mill of 1815 and Moves to Replace Musket Barrel Grinding by Turning c1780 to c1840

In 1841 Henry Wilkinson in his book Engines of War and William Greener in The Science of Gunnery describe a range of methods then in use for shaping the outside of gun barrels after the barrel forging process, ranging from manual off-hand grinding to the use of precision machines. In the same year G. & J. Rennie published the design of their state-of-the-art lathe that was capable of turning complex and dished barrel forms. This built upon the earlier work of both Henry Nock and John Jones. In the early years of the 19th century both Britain, at Enfield and other locations, and the USA, at Harpers Ferry and Springfield, began to introduce barrel-turning technology. This paper uses measurements taken from a significant number of military barrels made by several makers, and also newly exposed information about Henry Nock and the Enfield Factory of 1815, to understand better the technologies that were applied to military flintlock barrel finishing from the 1780s to the 1840s, and particularly during the major wars of 1793–1815, when high output was paramount. Measurements both of barrel form and out-of-roundness are presented. These allow the interpretation of the techniques being used by different makers at different locations, and raise questions about the purpose and achievement of the complex dished barrel forms found on British military flintlock muskets. This approach also allows us to better describe the earliest factory on the Enfield site, one of the most significant sites in the wider history of UK manufacturing.