公共娱乐场所电气火灾成因分析和预防对策

公共娱乐场所在利用大量电气设备、设施为人们提供舒适环境的同时,也增大了电气火灾发生的危险性。分析了公共娱乐场所电气火灾的特点及成因,提出了预防公共娱乐场所电气火灾的消防安全管理对策。     

支队级灭火救援模块化编制模式探讨

针对城市辖区内灭火救援的实际任务需要,从灭火救援模块化编制的组成及对部队现有训练模式的影响两个方面进行探讨,提出对部队的车辆人员进行模块化编程,以固定的模块化力量组合来应对变化的火场和应急救援任务,发挥人员及车辆的最佳效能。     

加强和改进应急救援工作若干问题思考

当前消防部队面临的应急救援形势越来越严峻,担负的任务越来越繁重,作战行动也越来越艰苦,这给公安消防部队提出了新的挑战,也使公安消防部队应急救援工作具有新的发展机遇。论述了当前公安消防部队应急救援工作存在的问题,提出了加强和改进应急救援工作的建议。     

处置突发事件中实施运用《人民武装警察法》应把握的原则

《人民武装警察法》为武警部队处置突发事件明确了充分的法律依据,树立了系统的法律规范,提供了可靠的法律保障。同时也对武警部队依法处置突发事件提出了更高的要求,即必须做到：指挥法定,任务法定,职责法定,行为法定,保障法定,责任法定。武警部队在处置突发事件中对《人民武装警察法》的实施运用,应当把握好以下原则：统一领导,集中指挥;严格审批,依法用警;把握权限,严格执法;遵纪守法,规范言行;多方协调,全面保障;接受监督,承担责任。     

基于心理干预视角的高校突发事件预防

心理干预在高校突发事件管理中具有不可替代的作用,它是处置高校突发事件的重要途径,也是预防高校突发事件发生的重要手段。为更好地预防高校突发事件,应建立起预防高校突发事件的大学生心理干预机制,并将其作为高校突发事件应对机制的重要组成部分。     

航天应用载荷的高精度时间同步与共用信息分发

应用载荷直接获取航天器平台的时间和公共测量信息,并不能完全满足载荷的高精度时间基准和共用信息使用需求。一些功能载荷具备向外输出高精度时间和状态测量信息的能力,但硬件接口资源有限。将功能载荷作为FC-AE-1553光纤网络的一个节点,在FC-AE-1553光纤网络中叠加IEEE 1588v2时间同步协议,功能载荷的高精度时钟源能同步给有需求的其他载荷。并在时间同步的前提下,将功能载荷的测量数据如定位数据、姿态数据和轨道数据等共用信息同步发送至网络上的其他载荷节点。通过时间同步与同步发送机制,解决了各载荷对高精度时间和共用信息的需求,弥补了专用信息硬件接口资源的不足。结果表明,与直接利用航天器平台的信息源相比较,当时钟源和共用信息来自功能载荷时,FC-AE-1553网络时间同步之后的时间基准精度和共用信息利用性能高出3个数量级,载荷获取的UTC时间精度达到百纳     

汽油与柴油混合用作柴油机应急燃料的探讨

应急燃料对于提高战时油料保障能力具有重要意义。文章以在-10#军用柴油中掺入90#车用汽油(简称为汽柴混合油)为例,从柴油机燃料应具有的品质性能着手,分析了汽柴混合油作为柴油机应急燃料的可行性。把车用汽油和军用柴油按照不同的比例掺兑,将试验结果与军用柴油的性能要求和美军应急使用指标对某些理化性能的要求相比照, 指出了汽柴混合油作为柴油机燃料的可行性,并提出了建议。     

Book reviews

Jurgen Brauer's comment presents what he calls a replication of an earlier study by Higgs and Kilduff (1993) and uses it to criticize the adequacy of the Higgs‐Kilduff model. In several respects, however, Brauer has not actually performed a replication: he uses different data, a different sample period, and arrives at different results. His criticisms rest on his own setup, not that of Higgs and Kilduff. Therefore they have no strict applicability to the latter. Moreover, Brauer's stepwise model has no bearing on the Higgs‐Kilduff model, as it violates that model's specification requirements.     

THE CASE FOR DEFENCE

What is the case for defence and is it a worthwhile investment? This question is addressed for two contrasting nations, namely, the UK and New Zealand. Economists have a set of standard analytical tools for addressing the question but they are difficult to operationalise. This paper provides policy‐relevant answers.     

A simple and untraditional analysis of western alliance burden‐sharing

The original Olson and Zeckhauser model of alliance burden‐sharing was based on the following four assumptions: (1) alliance defence is a pure public good; (2) allied nations make their security contribution decisions without consulting the other allies; (3) alliances produce only a single public good; and (4) alliance defence is produced with equal degrees of efficiency in all alliance nations. But while the first of these assumptions has received a great deal of attention in the alliance literature, the remaining ones have received comparatively less attention, particularly in terms of empirical analyses. This paper synthesizes a varied literature developed around these four assumptions, both substantively and theoretically, and shows that when these assumptions are brought closer to real world approximations, hypotheses regarding the potential for security cooperation with less free‐riding result. This article also provides a simple test of Western alliance burden‐sharing in the areas of military spending, development resources spending, and research and development spending that supports the hypothesis positing more equitable burden‐sharing.