通用装备机械液压系统综合检测试验平台项目管理研究

根据通用装备机械液压系统综合检测试验平台项目研制的总体任务要求,应用现代项目管理理论和方法,确定了项目研制的生命周期阶段,分析了项目研制各阶段管理工作的主要内容,阐述了项目管理组织原则,建立了项目管理制度,划分了项目工作结构分解层次和具体管理单元,给出了项目进度计划制定的基本方法,提出了项目进度控制和质量管理的具体措施。     

Designing a screening experiment for highly reliable products

Within a reasonable life‐testing time, how to improve the reliability of highly reliable products is one of the great challenges to today's manufacturers. By using a resolution III experiment together with degradation test, Tseng, Hamada, and Chiao (1995) presented an interesting case study of improving the reliability of fluorescent lamps. However, in conducting such an experiment, they did not address the problem of how to choose the optimal settings of variables, such as sample size, inspection frequency, and termination time for each run, which are influential to the correct identification of significant factors and the experimental cost. Assuming that the product's degradation paths satisfy Wiener processes, this paper proposes a systematic approach to the aforementioned problem. First, an intuitively appealing identification rule is proposed. Next, under the constraints of a minimum probability of correct decision and a maximum probability of incorrect decision of the proposed identification rule, the optimum test plan (including the determinations of inspection frequency, sample size, and termination time for each run) can be obtained by minimizing the total experimental cost. An example is provided to illustrate the proposed method. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 49: 514–526, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/nav.10024     

基于分形理论的目标航路预测

电磁干扰条件下解决断续航路预测问题对防空兵有效抗击空中目标至关重要。针对包络灰预测方法预测精度较低和Verhulst灰色预测模型计算过程复杂的情况,提出了预测航路的分形方法。在分形理论的基础上,研究了其用于目标断续航路预测的基本思路,建立了基于分形的目标航路预测模型,并对模型进行了求解。最后,利用建立的分形模型对雷达丢失目标后的目标航路进行了预测,通过实例体现了分形方法在用于航路预测时的准确性、灵活性和易实现等特点。结果表明,用该法对断续目标航路的预测具有一定的借鉴意义。     

基于区间数TOPSIS法优选空军战役作战计划

针对战役作战计划优选中的不确定性,运用区间分析和TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)法探索空军战役作战计划优选问题.通过引进区间数乘法运算,将区间数多指标决策问题转变为指标为区间数的多指标决策问题,进而给出区间数多指标决策问题的TOPSIS法,对空军战役作战计划进行排序选优.与传统方法相比较,该方法较好地解决了评价指标为不确定值时的多指标决策问题.     

一种基于知识的作战计划系统设计

作战计划系统是复杂的问题求解系统,在军事领域的各个方面发挥着重要的作用。介绍了当前一些主要的作战计划辅助生成系统及其特点,分析比较和归纳整理了当前军用计划系统所采用的一些常见规划技术和优缺点,重点分析了作战计划系统中的智能规划技术。在此基础上,提出了一种基于知识的作战计划辅助生成系统的开发设想,构建了系统知识库,系统采用层级任务网络规划技术,给出了这种规划技术的理论框架和算法过程,并且把这种技术与多主体规划技术相结合,辅助实现军事作战任务的逐层分解与规划优化,进而生成完整的行动序列,较好地解决了作战计划辅助生成问题。     

基于舰艇编队的反舰导弹航路规划区域划分

根据舰艇编队对海导弹攻击中航路规划指挥决策的需要,为避免各舰发射的导弹出现航路交叉现象,提出了单舰导弹航路规划功能区域的概念和编队导弹航路规划区域划分的思想,建立了编队导弹航路规划区域划分模型。分别研究了一般情况和复杂情况下的导弹航路规划区域划分方法,并且结合想定装备参数进行了编程实现和算例分析。为编队指挥员实施导弹航路规划决策提供辅助决策和科学依据。     

装甲器材申请计划及辅助决策模型问题研究

通过对我军装甲装备器材管理体制中,器材计划请领与供给的现状分析,提出了运用运筹学的理论和方法,结合计算机信息化管理手段,探讨装甲装备器材消耗规律模型和进行申请计划辅助决策分析的一整套解决方案。     

目标的规避过程与搜索运动

应用随机过程的观点,研究了静态目标和动态目标的几种规避方式、运动规律和目标位置的概率分布,导出了在上述几种情况下对规避目标的最优（理论）搜索计划。     

战时运输道路决策支持模型

战时与平时道路问题比较,最为显著的特点就是敌情对道路的制约作用。战时道路问题是一个多因素、多目标决策问题。解决该问题的思路是:首先穷举可能方案,然后计算每个方案各步骤的目标值,再将各步骤目标值综合成方案的目标值,最后进行方案的排劣、优选,得到适当数量的(3～5个)方案供决策者使用。决策目标有:完成运输的时间、货物损失率和不能完成运输任务的概率。     

Design of accelerated life testing plans under multiple stresses

Accelerated life testing (ALT) using multiple stresses is commonly used in practice to resemble the operating stresses at normal operating conditions and obtain failure observations in a much shorter time. However, to date, there is little research into the theory of planning ALT for reliability estimation with multiple stresses. ALT with multiple stresses can result in a large number of stress‐level combinations which presents a challenge for implementation. In this article, we propose an approach for the design of ALT plans with multiple stresses and formulate multistress test plans based on different objectives and practical constraints. We develop a simulated annealing algorithm to efficiently determine the testing plan parameters. We demonstrate the proposed method with examples based on an actual test conducted using three stress types. The obtained optimal test plans are compared with those based on fractional factorial design. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 60: 468–478, 2013