首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   431篇
  免费   163篇
  国内免费   27篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   5篇
  2021年   14篇
  2020年   11篇
  2019年   14篇
  2018年   4篇
  2017年   24篇
  2016年   31篇
  2015年   23篇
  2014年   41篇
  2013年   24篇
  2012年   27篇
  2011年   45篇
  2010年   23篇
  2009年   39篇
  2008年   29篇
  2007年   32篇
  2006年   31篇
  2005年   35篇
  2004年   30篇
  2003年   17篇
  2002年   15篇
  2001年   19篇
  2000年   17篇
  1999年   12篇
  1998年   12篇
  1997年   7篇
  1996年   8篇
  1995年   3篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   5篇
  1992年   5篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   5篇
  1989年   3篇
  1988年   3篇
  1987年   1篇
排序方式: 共有621条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
621.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the problem of constructing an appointment template for scheduling patients at a specific type of multidisciplinary outpatient clinic called an integrated practice unit (IPU). The focus is on developing and solving a stochastic optimization model for a back pain IPU in the face of random arrivals, an uncertain patient mix, and variable service times. The deterministic version of the problem is modeled as a mixed integer program with the objective of minimizing a weighted combination of clinic closing time (duration) and total patient waiting time (length of stay). A two‐stage stochastic program is then derived to account for the randomness and the sequential nature of the decisions. Although it was not possible to solve the two‐stage problem for even a limited number of scenarios, the wait‐and‐see (WS) problem was sufficiently tractable to provide a lower bound on the stochastic solution. The introduction of valid inequalities, limiting indices, and the use of special ordered sets helped to speed up the computations. A greedy heuristic was also developed to obtain solutions much more quickly. Out of practical considerations, it was necessary to develop appointment templates with time slots at fixed intervals, which are not available from the WS solution. The first to be derived was the expected value (EV) template that is used to find the expected value of the EV solution (EEV). This solution provides an upper bound on the objective function value of the two‐stage stochastic program. The average gap between the EEV and WS solutions was 18%. Results from extensive computational testing are presented for the EV template and for our adaptation of three other templates found in the literature. Depending on the relative importance of the two objective function metrics, the results demonstrate the trade‐off that exists between them. For the templates investigated, the “closing time” ranged from an average of 235 to 275 minutes for a 300‐minute session, while the corresponding “total patient time in clinic” ranged from 80 to 71 minutes.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号