混合现实技术在军事训练中的应用优势——以美军综合训练环境为例

随着科技手段的进步,现代战争的作战样式不断发展。信息化条件下的作战对军事训练提出了更高要求,传统的训练方法与模式亟待改进。混合现实技术的应用开辟了军事训练新模式。这种针对数据的可视化集成运用以及在其基础上开发的训练系统,通过对数据的处理利用实现了军事训练效果的有效评估。本文以美国陆军综合训练环境这一混合现实技术在军事训练中的典型应用案例作为对象,分析概述了综合训练环境的世界地形、训练模拟软件及训练管理工具三大组成部分的功能特点、架构组成,并根据混合现实技术的发展状况探析综合训练环境的应用优势,以期为军队混合现实技术在军事训练中的应用提供一定借鉴。     

人工智能赋能军事训练

随着大数据、物联网和5G的不断发展,海量数据的获取变得越来越容易,人工智能技术利用GPU的强大计算能力和深度学习网络对高维数据和非线性模型的拟合能力,迎来了飞跃式发展,深刻改变着人类生产、生活和学习方式,出现了语音识别、机器翻译、无人驾驶及智能机器人等场景,计算、数据与模型的不断发展也成为推动人工智能前进的主要动力。本文分析了人工智能技术的主要发展方向,包括自然语言处理、语音识别和图像识别分析等,结合当前人工智能的主要技术方向和典型应用,展望了人工智能在军事训练领域的广阔应用前景,同时,聚焦发展智能化军事训练亟需解决的关键问题,针对解决网络、数据、模型等面临的问题提出措施建议,指出应通过模拟仿真训练提高训练效率,基于训练数据科学评价训练效果。     

通信设备及其网络仿真训练模型的分析

根据通信设备及其网络的特点和通信业务训练的要求 ,提出了层次化结构的仿真训练模型 ,并提供和分析了各层建模方法和编程技术。然后介绍了通信设备及其网络仿真训练系统的典型实例 ,结果表明 :该模型对于建立通信设备及其网络仿真训练系统具有易于代码开发、易于理解、易于维护管理、易于系统功能扩展的特点。     

Fighting a Just War in the Midst of an Unreasonable International Strife: World War I and the Collapse of the Central European System of the Triple Imperial Dominion

ABSTRACT

This article constitutes an attempt to demonstrate the complexity of factors affecting the legitimate acquisition and reasonable exercise by a political community of the right to war as specified in the just war criteria of jus ad bellum. To achieve this purpose, a brief analysis is presented of the intentional participation in World War I of thousands of Polish volunteers forming military units deployed by the Central Powers on the Austrian-Russian front. Considered in light of the standard principles of just war, the military enterprise of the Polish Legions, as they were called, turns out to be a paradoxical instance of warfare which, while being part of a state-to-state aggression, must be deemed compliant with all the principles in question. As a means of explaining this paradox, a modification of the concept of justified intervention is proposed, embracing military efforts aimed at the ultimate defeat of all the (unjustly) warring parties operating within a given territory. In consonance with the classic just war approach, it is also argued that the justification for such an intervention is essentially dependent on its being initiated by, or attributable to, an unquestionable state agent acting in defence of the state’s basic prerogatives.