ADTA-1：一种嵌入式异构双核微处理器

针对多核日益严重的功耗问题,利用异步技术在低功耗方面的优势,结合数据触发结构设计并实现了一种嵌入式异构双核微处理器(ADTA-1).该设计将异步设计应用于嵌入式多核微处理器中,并在芯片中对异步微处理器进行了测试,验证了异步电路在多核微处理器中的有效性和低功耗特性,为进一步设计和实现低功耗异步多核微处理器进行了有益的探索.     

并联系统可靠性分配的模糊层次分析法

综合考虑影响系统可靠性分配的定性因素和定量因素、影响因素的模糊性以及系统的结构组成.利用层次分析法可集定性与定量分析于一体,从而确定出各影响因素对可靠性分配的权重向量;模糊数学理论进而确定出分系统之间可靠性水平的相对比重;进行模糊变换最终进行并联系统的可靠性分配.结合实例分析,对并联系统运用模糊理论和层次分析法相结合的方法进行可靠性分配科学、合理,便于工程应用.     

多操纵面战斗机动态控制分配策略研究(英文)

现代先进飞机配置多个操纵面且又冗余,这有利于实现非常规飞行,提高飞机敏捷性,使飞机在机动和故障时有更多的选择,但是同时也导致了飞机控制设计复杂度的增加.为了达到更好的效果,就必须利用控制分配器来充分利用多操纵面的不同带宽.从频率域角度出发,研究了动态控制分配方法,并将其应用于某型先进战斗机的控制分配器设计中,利用鸭翼的频率特性抵消府舱过载,经仿真验证,采用动态控制分配策略时,可以有效地减小座舱过载,同时还可以减小配平阻力,取得了良好的控制效果.     

高层民用建筑电气防火设计

针对高层民用建筑电气防火设计问题,结合现行国家标准的规定进行了探讨,提出了消防电源及其配电、应急照明等设计原则。     

无动力逃生梯部分替代疏散楼梯的可行性研究

从无动力逃生梯的工作原理、自身优点、疏散能力和产品造价等方面与安全疏散楼梯进行比较,对无动力逃生梯部分替代疏散楼梯的可行性进行了深入分析和探讨,最后得出可以根据建筑的消防安全疏散的实际情况部分替代疏散楼梯。     

矩阵开关技术在通用ATS电源模块自检中的应用

针对通用ATS中电源模块检查过程中存在检查时间长、劳动量大、工作效率低且易出错等问题,将矩阵开关技术引入通用ATS中电源模块的自检过程中,选取电压信号的均值和均方差作为评价电源模块性能的特征参数,并利用矩阵开关的多路复用功能设计了电源模块自检的拓扑结构,实现了自检过程中多通道的自动配置。仿真验证试验说明了该方法具有多通道自动配置、自检时间短、故障定位准确等优点。     

一种基于层次位线缓冲的异步片上路由器

片上缓存资源是片上路由器的重要组成部分,其结构好坏直接关系到片上互联网络的实现复杂度、整体性能及功耗开销。鉴于异步电路的握手工作方式,异步路由器一般采用基于移位寄存器的异步FIFO(First In First Out)实现片上缓冲,这种结构导致了报文传输延迟及数据翻转次数增加。提出一种基于层次位线缓冲的异步FIFO结构,设计实现了一种新的异步路由器结构。相对于传统异步路由器,新的异步路由器能够有效降低路由器设计的硬件复杂度,减少数据的冗余翻转,降低功耗。实验结果表明在相同配置的情况下,新异步路由器面积降低了39.3%;当异步FIFO深度为8的时候,新异步路由器能够获得41.1%的功耗降低。     

Spatial pricing and product allocation in online retailing

Spatial pricing means a retailer price discriminates its customers based on their geographic locations. In this article, we study how an online retailer should jointly allocate multiple products and facilitate spatial price discrimination to maximize profits. When deciding between a centralized product allocation ((i.e., different products are allocated to the same fulfillment center) and decentralized product allocation (ie, different products are allocated to different fulfillment centers), the retailer faces the tradeoff between shipment pooling (ie, shipping multiple products in one package), and demand localization (ie, stocking products to satisfy local demand) based on its understanding of customers' product valuations. In our basic model, we consider two widely used spatial pricing policies: free on board (FOB) pricing that charges each customer the exact amount of shipping cost, and uniform delivered (UD) pricing that provides free shipping. We propose a stylized model and find that centralized product allocation is preferred when demand localization effect is relatively low or shipment pooling benefit is relatively high under both spatial pricing policies. Moreover, centralized product allocation is more preferred under the FOB pricing which encourages the purchase of virtual bundles of multiple products. Furthermore, we respectively extend the UD and FOB pricing policies to flat rate shipping (ie, the firm charges a constant shipping fee for each purchase), and linear rate shipping (ie, the firm sets the shipping fee as a fixed proportion of firm's actual fulfillment costs). While similar observations from the basic model still hold, we find the firm can improve its profit by sharing the fulfillment cost with its customers via the flat rate or linear rate shipping fee structure.     

Pricing and capacity allocation strategies: Implications for manufacturers with product sharing

Emerging sharing modes, like the consumer-to-consumer (C2C) sharing of Uber and the business-to-consumer (B2C) sharing of GoFun, have considerably affected the retailing markets of traditional manufacturers, who are motivated to consider product sharing when making pricing and capacity decisions, particularly electric car manufacturers with limited capacity. In this paper, we examine the equilibrium pricing for a capacity-constrained manufacturer under various sharing modes and further analyze the impact of capacity constraint on the manufacturer's sharing mode selection as well as equilibrium outcomes. We find that manufacturers with low-cost products prefer B2C sharing while those with high-cost products prefer C2C sharing except when the sharing price is moderate. However, limited capacity motivates manufacturers to enter into the B2C sharing under a relatively low sharing price, and raise the total usage level by sharing high-cost products. We also show that the equilibrium capacity allocated to the sharing market with low-cost products first increases and then decreases. Finally, we find that sharing low-cost products with a high limited capacity leads to a lower retail price under B2C sharing, which creates a win-win situation for both the manufacturer and consumers. However, sharing high-cost products with a low limited capacity creates a win-lose situation for them.     

Callable products with dependent demands

Capacity providers such as airlines often sell the same capacity to different market segments at different prices to improve their expected revenues. The absence of a secondary market, due to the nontransferability of airline tickets, gives rise to an opportunity for airlines to broker capacity between consumers with different willingness to pay. One way to broker capacity is by the introduction of callable products. The idea is similar to callable bonds where the issuer has the right, but not the obligation, to buy back the bonds at a certain price by a certain date. The idea of callable products was introduced before under the assumption that the fare-class demands are all independent. The independent assumption becomes untenable when there is significant demand recovery (respectively, demand cannibalization) when lower fares are closed (respectively, opened). In this case, consumer choice behavior should be modeled explicitly to make meaningful decisions. In this paper, we consider a general consumer choice model and develop the optimal strategy for callable products. Our numerical study illustrates how callable products are win-win-win, for the capacity provider and for both high and low fare consumers. Our studies also identify conditions for callable products to result in significant improvements in expected revenues.