Introduction: Exploring the jungle of terminology |
| |
Authors: | Beatrice Heuser |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Politics &2. IR, University of Reading, Reading, UKd.b.g.heuser@reading.ac.uk |
| |
Abstract: | When twentieth-century authors wrote about ‘partisan warfare’, they usually meant an insurgency or asymmetric military operations conducted against a superior force by small bands of ideologically driven irregular fighters. By contrast, originally (i.e. before the French Revolution) ‘partisan’ in French, English, and German referred only to the leader of a detachment of special forces (party, partie, Parthey, détachement) which the major European powers used to conduct special operations alongside their regular forces. Such special operations were the classic definition of ‘small war’ (petite guerre) in the late seventeenth and in the eighteenth centuries. The Spanish word ‘la guerrilla’, meaning nothing other than ‘small war’, only acquired an association with rebellion with the Spanish War of Independence against Napoleon. Even after this, however, armies throughout the world have continued to employ special forces. In the late nineteenth century, their operations have still been referred to as prosecuting ‘la guerrilla’ or ‘small war’, which existed side by side with, and was often mixed with, ‘people's war’ or popular uprisings against hated regimes. |
| |
Keywords: | small war party/parties partisan/partisans rebellion rebels bands bandits insurgency counter-insurgency special operations special forces |
|
|