Counterinsurgency force ratio: strategic utility or nominal necessity |
| |
Authors: | Riley M. Moore |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Podesta Group, Washington, DC, USARiley.Moore29@gmail.com |
| |
Abstract: | As a consequence of intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan, force ratio for counterinsurgency (COIN) has come under increased scrutiny. Reduced to its essence, the issue is simply, ‘How many troops does it take to get the job done?’ This answer has been sought by the US military, academia, and think tanks. There have been numerous responses, culminating in several ‘plug-and-play’ equations for minimum force ratios in COIN operations. Due to the impossibility of determining precisely how many insurgent forces there are, it has become common to base force ratios on the population of the country. In the realm of policy, the question above is posed as, ‘How many of our troops does it take to get the job done?’ |
| |
Keywords: | counterinsurgency COIN force ratio counterinsurgency field manual, FM 3-24 counterterrorism Malaya Northern Ireland Algeria Thailand Iraq Afghanistan United States United Kingdom Syria counterinsurgency success center of gravity |
|
|