| 略评“语言谬误”──评介楚明锟主编的《逻辑学》 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄展骥. 略评“语言谬误”──评介楚明锟主编的《逻辑学》[J]. 兵团教育学院学报, 2001, 11(3): 30-33 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄展骥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 香港中文大学 深圳大学,香港 |
| |
| 摘 要： | ２０世纪５０年代以来,西方在非形式逻辑方面取得了重大进展。近几年来,我国逻辑界对此有愈来愈多的认识与响应。２０００年末出版的《逻辑学》教科书可视为一个例证。该书的价值和水平值得肯定。但其中的“语言谬误”一节大可商榷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 语言谬误 非形式逻辑 强调不当 暗箭伤人 名实混一 词语歧义 句法歧义 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-1548(2001)03-0030-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-07-20 |
Comment slightly "language fallacies"Review to "Logic"by CHU Ming- kun editor- in- chief |
| |
| HUANG Zhan-ji. Comment slightly "language fallacies"Review to "Logic"by CHU Ming- kun editor- in- chief[J]. Journal of Bingtuan Education Institute, 2001, 11(3): 30-33 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Zhan-ji |
| |
| Abstract: | Since 1950s,The West have gotten significant progress in the informal logic. In last few years, The logic circle of our country have knowledge and respond more and more for this. 2000 end published " logic " textbook can be regard as a illustration. The level and the value of this book are worth for to affirm. But" language fallacies " in which can be discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | Language fallacies informal logic Emphasize improperly Stab in the back name be confused with substance equivocation amphiboly |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
