首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

非法拘禁罪之“共犯与身份”问题探究
引用本文:陈山.非法拘禁罪之“共犯与身份”问题探究[J].中国人民武装警察部队学院学报,2011,27(3):42-46.
作者姓名:陈山
作者单位:四川师范大学,法学院,四川,成都,610066
基金项目:四川省教育厅青年项目《非法拘禁罪研究》成果
摘    要:"国家机关工作人员利用职权"犯非法拘禁罪是以义务违反和法益侵害为规范特质的不纯正的身份犯,相对于非法拘禁罪的基本犯,特别地增添了职责义务违反的不法要素。"国家机关工作人员利用职权"犯非法拘禁罪缺乏独立的法定刑与罪名,无身份者加功有身份者或者有身份者加功无身份者实行非法拘禁行为,有无身份者虽能在"国家机关工作人员利用职权"犯非法拘禁罪的层面成立共同犯罪,但有无身份者只能被认定为"非法拘禁罪"的正犯或者共犯,仅在适用刑罚层面考虑身份犯的共犯关系对刑罚轻重的影响。

关 键 词:非法拘禁罪  不纯正的身份犯  共犯之处罚根据  间接正犯

On the Complicity and Status of False Imprisonment
CHEN Shan.On the Complicity and Status of False Imprisonment[J].Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy,2011,27(3):42-46.
Authors:CHEN Shan
Institution:CHEN Shan(Law School,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan Province 610066,China)
Abstract:False imprisonment by state personnel is impure status crime,the essence of which is composed of the breach of duty and infringement of legal interests.It specially raises responsibilities breach of duty.In our criminal legal system,false imprisonment by state personnel has not individual sentence and charges,so that someone with status and someone without status could only be identified as joint offence of false imprisonment,whether someone with status influences someone without status or oppositely.The accomplice relation only affects penalty.
Keywords:false imprisonment  impure status crime  accomplice punishable ground  indirect guilt
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号