Right Intention and the Ends of War |
| |
Authors: | Duncan Purves Ryan Jenkins |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Environmental Studies Department, New York University, New York, USA;2. Department of Philosophy, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The jus ad bellum criterion of right intention (CRI) is a central guiding principle of just war theory. It asserts that a country’s resort to war is just only if that country resorts to war for the right reasons. However, there is significant confusion, and little consensus, about how to specify the CRI. We seek to clear up this confusion by evaluating several distinct ways of understanding the criterion. On one understanding, a state’s resort to war is just only if it plans to adhere to the principles of just war while achieving its just cause. We argue that the first understanding makes the CRI superfluous, because it can be subsumed under the probability of success criterion. On a second understanding, a resort to war is just only if a state’s motives, which explain its resort to war, are of the right kind. We argue that this second understanding of the CRI makes it a significant further obstacle to justifying war. However, this second understanding faces a possible infinite regress problem, which, left unresolved, leaves us without a plausible interpretation of the CRI. This constitutes a significant and novel reason for leaving the CRI out of the international law of armed conflict (LOAC). |
| |
Keywords: | Just war theory law of armed conflict (LOAC) right intention jus ad bellum just cause probability of success motives intentions |
|
|