不确定情况下协同空战目标分配方法

现代空战环境下出现的大量不确定信息, 现在常用的协同目标分配模型都没有考虑到这种情况.针对这种情况,将随机规划引入到协同空战目标分配研究中,在一般期望值模型的基础上,建立了多机空战协同目标分配期望值模型,并利用随机模拟、神经网络和遗传算法结合而成的混合智能算法来求解该期望值模型.2∶4协同空战仿真结果表明该模型的有效性.     

多机协同目标与火力资源分配

在协同空战中,快速正确的空战决策是己方战机少受敌方伤害并取得战争胜利的前提。目标与火力资源分配是决策过程的重要部分。多机空战与单机空战相比有明显的不同,不同之处是面临多个敌方目标,根据我方资源最优分配作战对象和火力,基于遗传算法实现了两种算法的有人无人目标与火力资源分配。仿真结果表明,带有毁伤概率门限的算法既节省火力资源又快速有效。     

防空导弹反TBM作战指挥中目标分配关键问题研究

依据防空反导作战理论和目标分配的要求,对防空导弹反TBM作战指挥中目标分配的关键问题进行了研究。分别对威胁排序方法、拦截可行性条件、目标分配原则和目标分配算法进行了分析,提出了一种反TBM作战指挥中目标分配问题的算法,最后讨论了目标分配的评价问题。通过实际应用表明此方法是切实可行的。     

战斗机远距空战建模与仿真分析

针对中远距一对一的空战问题,从效能分析的角度建立了一对一中远距空战及作战效能分析的模型,包括飞机运动模型、飞机机动动作控制模型、推力模型、火控系统模型、导弹运动模型、导弹制导与控制模型、信息系统模型和效能评估模型等。依据该模型进行了空战仿真并给出效能分析结果,仿真结果与实际吻合,证明模型的有效性,为进一步研究多对多空战仿真打下基础。     

战役优势参数及其应用研究

数学分析方法在军事行动计划中扮演着越来越显著的角色。对以兰彻斯特作战模型为基础的描述诸兵种合成作战的矩阵微分方程，以及由方程的控制矩阵和状态变量初值，在不解方程的情况下导出的战役优势参数进行了研究；以空战为例讨论了预测战役结局、辅助军事决策、优化兵力部署和规划火力分配等战役优势参数的主要应用；给出了对战役优势参数和数学模型的评价。     

Resourcing for defense: Solving the roles and missions puzzle

One of the most important issues facing the post‐Cold War U.S. defense establishment concerns the future allocation of combat tasks and responsibilities among different branches of the armed forces. The challenge is to reduce unnecessary redundancy across roles and missions when resources are highly constrained, without compromising military effectiveness. Defining the policy problem as one of resource allocation rather than operational effectiveness, we develop a methodology for allocating roles and missions. Our methodology focuses at the highest level of force aggregation and uses a mathematical programming model to produce cross‐service cross‐mission trade‐offs that will yield the best total force combat and non‐combat potential within resource consumption constraints.     

应用新型Lanchester方程的非对称空战进程预测

针对未来空战中可能出现的非对称空战问题进行研究,在设定的非对称空战背景下构建新型Lanchester方程对问题进行建模分析,得到单一机种和多兵种非对称空战模型,并通过仿真试验验证了模型的有效性,对非对称空战指挥决策提供了一定的帮助。     

Allocation of quality improvement targets based on investments in learning

Purchased materials often account for more than 50% of a manufacturer's product nonconformance cost. A common strategy for reducing such costs is to allocate periodic quality improvement targets to suppliers of such materials. Improvement target allocations are often accomplished via ad hoc methods such as prescribing a fixed, across‐the‐board percentage improvement for all suppliers, which, however, may not be the most effective or efficient approach for allocating improvement targets. We propose a formal modeling and optimization approach for assessing quality improvement targets for suppliers, based on process variance reduction. In our models, a manufacturer has multiple product performance measures that are linear functions of a common set of design variables (factors), each of which is an output from an independent supplier's process. We assume that a manufacturer's quality improvement is a result of reductions in supplier process variances, obtained through learning and experience, which require appropriate investments by both the manufacturer and suppliers. Three learning investment (cost) models for achieving a given learning rate are used to determine the allocations that minimize expected costs for both the supplier and manufacturer and to assess the sensitivity of investment in learning on the allocation of quality improvement targets. Solutions for determining optimal learning rates, and concomitant quality improvement targets are derived for each learning investment function. We also account for the risk that a supplier may not achieve a targeted learning rate for quality improvements. An extensive computational study is conducted to investigate the differences between optimal variance allocations and a fixed percentage allocation. These differences are examined with respect to (i) variance improvement targets and (ii) total expected cost. For certain types of learning investment models, the results suggest that orders of magnitude differences in variance allocations and expected total costs occur between optimal allocations and those arrived at via the commonly used rule of fixed percentage allocations. However, for learning investments characterized by a quadratic function, there is surprisingly close agreement with an “across‐the‐board” allocation of 20% quality improvement targets. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 48: 684–709, 2001     

编队超视距空战效能评估方法

现有的两步裁定空战模型大多直接借鉴基于飞机易损性的先敌发射概率计算方法,而各种飞机的易损性无法通过解析模型来获取,因此降低了模型的通用性.在现有的研究基础上提出了作战飞机先敌发射指数概念,并基于空战双方的先敌发射指数提出了新的先敌发射概率计算模型和更为具体的编队超视距空战效能评估模型.最后给出了相关实例进行验证.     

Markovian models of three‐on‐one combat involving a hidden defender

In this paper, Markovian models of three‐on‐one stochastic firefights between ground‐based weapon systems are developed. These models address a common scenario of interest to the military, but one which has been much neglected in analytic combat models, that of combat between a hidden defender and an exposed attacking force. Each combatant must detect an opponent before commencing their firing cycle, a task which is considerably more difficult for the attacker. In the models developed here, the defender detects the exposed attacking group after an exponentially distributed time interval, while each attacker has a fixed probability of detecting the defender via the flash signature produced after each shot fired by him. The utility of the approach is demonstrated by investigating what impact the introduction of a coordinated gun‐laying system for the attacking force might have, a system made possible by battlefield digitization. The method used here allows models to be developed incrementally. This and other advantages of the Markovian approach are discussed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 49: 627–646, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/nav.10041     

一种新的超视距空战目标威胁评估距离指标模型

距离指标是进行超视距空战目标威胁评估的重要指标,但当前多数的距离指标模型都过于简单。针对这种不足,在仿真分析当前典型模型的基础上,根据空战的实际情况,首先定性分析了目标位置等因素对于威胁度的影响;然后根据探测距离、导弹射程等参数,将敌我距离分成不同阶段,区分敌我性能强弱的不同情况,分阶段建立了一种新的距离指标模型。最后,针对不同的战场态势,进行了仿真分析,证明了模型的有效性。模型对于提升空战威胁评估的准确性具有积极意义。     

协同空战的最小共享信息集

首先提出了最小共享信息集的概念。然后 ,提出了作战飞机的智能系统模型。从它入手 ,分析了协同空战的信息 ,提出了确定协同空战的最小共享信息集的事件法 ,并应用信息论证明了事件法的确能够减少通信的信息量。在上述基础上 ,确定了超视距空对空协同作战的最小共享信息集 ;仿真结果验证了它的合理性     

基于概率分析法的无人攻击机作战效能分析模型研究

未来防空战场上无人攻击机已成为一种重要的空中威胁。无人攻击机作战过程可分为飞行、突防、攻击三个阶段,运用概率分析方法分别建立了各阶段的数学模型,给出了其作战效能表达式,为进一步进行无人攻击机作战效能分析提供了模型基础。     

空战仿真中平面机动方式的数学模型研究

本文研究空战机动方式的数学模型,给出了几个平面基本机动方式的数学模型及其详细指导。包括纯追踪、顺航向接敌、纯碰撞、正前置角接敌、负前置角接敌等。这些数字模型应用在一个平面双机格斗仿真专家系统中得到了良好的效果。     

编队舰空导弹对空拦截综合模型研究

以水面舰艇编队防空为背景,用数学分析法和计算机模拟法对编队防空中预警直升机的配置和探测模型、舰载雷达的探测模型、编队对空导弹的抗击方法、编队对目标的射击能力、转火能力、杀伤概率等问题进行了研究,建立了火力方程等有关数学模型,为定量分析和优化编队对目标的作战能力提供了依据。     

空战模型研究

本文论述了空战一般作战模式厦空战构模特点,并具体构造了一个集团军作战规模的训练用空战模型。利用该模型对不同空战编队的作战效果进行了计算,其结果可用干战术分析。     

第四代歼击机空战战术决策研究

根据第四代歼击机的作战能力,分析了空战过程中可能存在的三种态势,提出了影响第四代歼击机空战战术的重要因素。结合影响因素进行了模糊决策讨论,基于模糊神经网络的方法完成了空战决策系统的设计,并通过神经网络的训练,确定了模糊决策网络。最后,通过仿真验证,表明决策系统实际输出与期望结果是一致的,决策结果是准确的,能够为决策者根据战场态势进行决策提供参考,缩短了决策时间,提高了指挥决策效能。     

资源约束条件下的空中兵力编组

通过对空中兵力的合理编组,实现作战资源的优化配置是提升兵力作战效能的有效途径。针对现代空战编队对抗过程的特点,从战术企图和信息优势角度提出了编队目标威胁评估方法。以编队目标为研究对象从宏观上调配己方作战资源,提出了作战资源成本和兵力调度成本2种兵力编组成本,在此基础上建立了资源约束条件下的兵力编组优化模型,并采用改进PSO算法对模型进行求解。作战想定仿真结果表明兵力编组模型能够有效解决空战兵力分配问题。     

基于双向启发式属性约简的战术决策建模研究

从预警机指挥引导的多机协同空战原则分析出发,针对超视距协同空战决策过程中的不确定性和不完备性问题,提出了一种不完备信息系统中的基于双向启发式属性约简的战术粗决策建模方法。首先考虑粗糙集决策过程中条件属性发生缺失或不确定的情况,根据扩展不完备信息概念建立了不完备决策信息系统的最优完备选择;其次基于分辨矩阵的属性约简算法,以属性频度的大小作为启发信息进行决策信息系统约简的双向选择,得出决策信息系统的最佳约简集合;然后依据使决策最有可能发生的原则,给出决策信息系统的最优选择,以该最优选择为代表提取出决策规则;最后根据软、硬杀伤结合使用的CGF实体超视距协同空战作战想定,建立了CGF实体综合战术决策模型,并通过作战决策实例对该方法的正确性和有效性进行了验证。结果表明：该方法能在作战态势信息不完备的情况下正确给出CGF实体综合战术行为。     

有人/无人战斗机协同空战模式及能力需求分析

针对未来空战的特点对有人/无人战斗机协同空战的作战模式及能力需求进行了研究.从信息链到武器链时空过渡的角度分析了有人/无人机协同空战的作战优势;提出了两种典型的有人/无人机协同空战方式,并给出了作战过程描述及功能结构分析;基于“观测-评估-决策-执行”指挥控制环分析了有人/无人机协同空战的指挥控制流程;基于协同空战的任务需求提出各参与平台的能力需求.此研究对有人/无人机协同空战的发展具有一定的指导意义.