空降防空中某便携式地空导弹对攻击直升机的作战效能研究

在空降兵战斗中,攻击直升机已成为我空降力量面临的最大空中威胁,由于便携式地空导弹具有可以对突然出现的低空、超低空日标实施精确攻击的优势,使得其被认为是抗击攻击自升机的首选.为了客观评估便携式导弹在空降作战中抗击攻击直升机的地位,有必要对其抗击作战效能进行研究,以便更好地发挥便携式地空导弹的作战潜能.     

战后局部战争中空降作战的运用与启示

在二战后局部战争中,空降作战被频频使用并大显身手,其远程奔袭、快速机动的优势得到了充分发挥,地位作用日益突出。研究战后局部战争中空降作战的运用,对于打赢未来高技术条件下的局部战争具有十分重要的意义。 　　一、 战后局部战争中空降作战的运用分析 　　空降作战始于第一次世界大战,成熟于第二次世界大战。二战后,随着大型军用运输机、直升机和伞降装备技术的发展,空降兵由过去的轻型部队发展成一支强大的突击力量,可独立执行各种纵深作战任务。空降作战也体现出了许多新特点,出现了一些新的作战样式,并产生了许多新的战…     

空降部队：垂直打击

2008年9月下旬，空降兵某师部分兵力兵器在戈壁草原——北京军区朱日和训练基地参加了代号为“砺兵-2008”迎外演习。此次演习首次使用人装同机同降技术，参加全军首次陆空跨区联合对抗演习有效锻炼了空降兵机械化作战能力．促进了空降兵核心作战能力的提高。演习成功探索了复杂电磁环境下作战训练问题，丰富了信息化条件下空降作战战法，     

防空导弹作战复杂电磁环境威胁势研究

为了分析和把握防空导弹作战面临的复杂电磁环境(CEME)态势,分析并建立了防空导弹作战CEME威胁模型;提出了防空导弹作战CEME威胁势概念,从态和势两方面深入分析了防空导弹作战CEME威胁势内涵,建立了防空导弹作战CEME威胁势函数模型;提出了基于集对分析(SPA)的防空导弹作战CEME威胁势评估新方法。论文研究对防空导弹作战电磁态势评估和电子对抗进程推演具有非常重要的理论指导意义和军事应用价值。     

电子作战目标威胁评估方法初探

为了对电子作战目标进行威胁评估,主要立足于电子战环境,分析了电子作战目标威胁评估的内容与作用,并系统深入地研究了当前常用的目标威胁评估方法,对判断敌情及电子对抗作战指挥具有一定的指导意义。     

诺曼底登陆战役中空降作战的特点及其启示

1944年 6月,盟军为保障诺曼底登陆战役的胜利,集中了美空降兵第 82师、第 101师和英空降兵第 6师,约 3.5万人（其中伞降 1.76余万人）,实施了大规模的空降作战,夺取了德军防御纵深的桥梁、交通要道和战略要地,控制了部分登陆场,保障了登陆部队的上陆和向德军纵深发展进攻。诺曼底空降作战是迄今为止规模最大的一次空降作战的成功范例。这次空降作战,利用在敌人头顶上开辟出来的翼侧空间,在战役上有力地配合了正面部队的登陆作战,取得了大规模战役空降的实战经验。 　　一、兵力运用上,动用了空前规模的空降部队,并集中使用在主…     

无人机集群在空降作战中的运用

无人机集群作战作为全新的作战样式，势必对当前作战理念、作战方式形成巨大冲击。本文基于无人机集群以其精确侦察、无人作战、立体机动等突出优势与空降作战的实时通信、跨域协同、战场保障等潜在短板可实现互补为出发点，重点探讨了无人机集群在空降作战中运用的独特优势及战法运用，并对无人机集群在空降作战中的运用提出了相应的对策建议。     

伊拉克战争中美军空降兵的作战使用

伊拉克战争结束快一年了。在这场力量对比极为悬殊的非对称作战中,美军的空降作战行动贯穿了战争全过程:从前期的威慑部署到展开地面进攻,从开辟北方战线到围攻巴格达,空降兵都发挥了重要作用。从中既可以看出空降兵在高技术局部战争中的重要作用,反映出空降兵作战使用的许多特点,也可以为我军空降兵建设提供非常有益的启示。美军空降兵的作战运用在伊拉克战争中,美第18空降军所属的第3机械化步兵师,第101空中突击     

重装空投冲击波

重装空投技术的解决，突破了制约空降兵战斗力提升的一大瓶颈。然而，伴随着这一变化的来临，传统的空降作战理论、作战样式乃至训练内容和方法都面临着变革的挑战。请看——     

复杂电磁环境舰艇电子对抗仿真系统研究

针对目前舰艇电子对抗装备作战效能分析、作战使用方法研究和训练平台实用性不强的现状，采用复杂电磁环境生成技术，运用电子对抗作战使用理论，结合系列研练电子对抗反导积累相关数据，建立电子对抗仿真模型，实现仿真系统控制、复杂电磁环境接收与生成、三维海战场环境仿真显示、多型电子对抗显控界面仿真、舰艇电子对抗作战效能评估、舰艇电子对抗仿真训练成绩评定等功能，研制贴近实际的复杂电磁环境水面舰艇电子对抗装备作战运用仿真系统，以充分发挥舰艇电子对抗装备的作战潜能。     

Controlled warfare: how directed-energy weapons will enable the US Military to fight effectively in an urban environment while minimizing collateral damage

US military operations are increasingly conducted within urban environments and with these operations come the risk of increasing the number of civilian casualties and infrastructure damage. The use of non-lethal weaponry, such as directed-energy weapons, is one method for minimizing collateral damage. This method enables US military forces to effectively fight within urban environments through force escalation capabilities. Using a series of historical examples and future scenarios for urban warfare, this article highlights deficiencies affecting military capabilities in military urban operations, addresses the consequences of collateral damage, assesses the effectiveness of directed-energy weapons in military urban operations and encourages further funding, research and integration of non-lethal weaponry, such as directed-energy weapons, within the US military.     

Non-lethal weapons and the long tail of warfare

This paper examines whether non-lethal weapons (NLWs) enhance the capability of the US armed forces to conduct irregular warfare (IW) operations. With expectations that the operational environment will only continue to become more complex in the future, NLWs may reduce the level of violence received, as well as dispensed, by US forces while performing tasks in the IW spectrum. We argue that NLWs increase the ability of US forces to address the long tail of warfare and their deployment should be increased in the near term.     

STRATEGY FOR A NEW NUCLEAR AGE

Current U.S. nuclear weapons strategy, force structure, and doctrine contribute to the threat of nuclear terrorism in several ways. First, the U.S. nuclear stockpile presents opportunities for nuclear terrorists to seize the materials they need. Second, U.S. nuclear forces remain a key justification for Russia's maintenance of similar nuclear forces that are less well protected. Third, America's continued embrace of nuclear weapons encourages and legitimizes other states to seek nuclear weapons that they will have difficulty securing from terrorists. The national security interests of the United States would be better served by a strategy to shrink the global footprint of nuclear weapons and provide the highest possible levels of security for the most minimal possible deterrent forces. Given the inability to secure nuclear weapons and materials perfectly or to eliminate terrorism in the foreseeable future, reducing the global inventory of nuclear weapons and materials is the most reliable way to reduce the chances of nuclear terrorism.     

The rise and fall of counterproliferation policy

The US government initiated a Defense Counterproliferation Initiative to address the concern that, in the post-Cold War years, the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons would be widespread and create a significant challenge to the US military’s combat operations. In particular, non-nuclear states might use chemical or biological warfare agents against US forces with the belief that nuclear weapons would not be used against them in retaliation. Following the events of September 11, 2001, defense strategy and policy shifted to a wider view of the threat of adversarial use of “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD) and the term “counterproliferation” was replaced by “combating” or “countering WMD.” Over time, the Defense Department increasingly moved away from counterproliferation principles with the detrimental effect of losing capabilities that US forces still need for contemporary adversaries. This shift has been aggravated by other US government agencies’ use of “counterproliferation” in lieu of what would have been termed “nonproliferation” activities in the 1990s. The loss of clarity within the US government on these terms has led to the inability to focus the “whole of government” on this significant national security challenge. To alleviate this challenge, the US government needs a top-down initiative to refocus policy on the distinctly different aspects of WMD with respect to military combat operations, combating terrorism, and homeland security.     

美军网络电磁行动定义及分析

近几年美军针对网络电磁空间不断出台新的政策和联合条令,但是相关规定在网络空间作战、电子战、频谱管理行动的定义上有交叠,为了进一步提高作战能力,防止冲突的发生,美军提出网络电磁行动的概念对三者进行整合,针对美军提出的网络电磁行动进行了介绍和分析并提出了对我国的一些启示。     

电磁干扰对远程制导火箭的影响及其应对措施

为了提高远程制导火箭的作战效能,分析了其弹道工作过程和影响其命中精度的误差因素,基于发射阶段、飞行中段和飞行末段剖析了其面临的电磁干扰机理。以远程制导火箭技战术特点为基础,从战场电磁频谱管理、模块化广域配置、战场佯动、新型射击方法、多维电子压制、发展新型弹药等方面探讨了信息化条件下应对电磁干扰的方法,为复杂战场环境下远程制导火箭弹的作战运用提供参考。     

舰载近区防卫武器综合运用

水面舰艇近区防卫武器的作战运用研究是舰载武器作战运用研究的新课题。在分析近区防卫目标特征、武器特点、作战方法的基础上,提出近区防卫武器综合运用一般原则,基于作战时域的连续性及效果的叠加性,构建近区防卫武器使用逻辑结构,建立武器运用的对策模型,可为近区防卫武器的科学使用提供理论参考。     

Russia and Strategic Conventional Weapons:

ABSTRACT

Russian political leaders and military strategists are growing increasingly concerned about “strategic conventional weapons”—a broad category that appears to include all non-nuclear, high-precision, standoff weapons—and about long-range, hypersonic weapons, in particular. These concerns are complex and multifaceted (and, in some cases, contradictory), but chief among them are the beliefs that strategic conventional weapons could prove decisive in a major conflict and that Russia is lagging behind in their development. US programs to develop and acquire such weapons—namely, the Conventional Prompt Global Strike program—are of great concern to Russian strategists, who argue both that the United States seeks such weapons for potential use against Russia—its nuclear forces, in particular—and because strategic conventional weapons are more “usable” than nuclear weapons. Asymmetric responses by Russia include increased reliance on tactical nuclear weapons, efforts to enhance the survivability of its nuclear forces, and investments in air and missile defenses. There is also strong—but not completely conclusive evidence—that Russia is responding symmetrically by attempting to develop a long-range, conventionally armed boost-glide weapon.     

电子系统的电磁仿生研究与进展

随着电磁环境愈发复杂、多变，应用于电子系统的传统电磁抗扰方式的不足正日渐突出。相比之下，生物却在可靠性、抗扰性、自适应和自修复等方面表现出明显的优势。对生物“自组织”现象进行了研究，指出了生物与电子系统的相似与不同，提出了“电磁仿生”概念。借助演化硬件这一平台，尝试着在人工电子系统中将“被组织”与“自组织”进行有机结合，使其具备生物的多种优良特性，从而提高系统在复杂电磁环境中的可靠性与适应性。