抗大培养知识青年干部的政治工作经验初探

本文论述了抗大在培养知识青年干部的政治工作中,始终遵循毛泽东提出的教育方针,坚持把“坚定正确的政治方向”放在首位,以“转变学生的思想”为着眼点,强调“知识分子工农化”,加强马列主义基本理论的教育,强化思想意识的锻炼,做好深入细致的思想工作,引导学生逐步接受无产阶级思想,并针对知识青年的特点,创造了丰富多彩的政治工作方式和方法。     

探索基层思想政治教育的新思路

第一,思想引导和环境熏陶齐抓.基层思想政治教育创新,必须及时回答和解决官兵思想活动中的重大理论和现实问题,坚持不懈地用马克思主义理论武装官兵头脑,坚定官兵的理想信念.同时,要营造一个有利于官兵全面发展的良好环境,实现基层思想政治教育的文化化,在潜移默化中实现思想政治工作教育人、培养人、塑造人的目的.     

试论军队思想政治教育与战争实践的关系

我军思想政治教育与战争实践的关系,是指在人民军队内部,从无产阶级意识形态出发,用有中国特色的社会主义精神文化培养适应人民民主专政和人民战争双重需要的武装人员。成功的军队思想政治教育促进部队战斗力;战争性质规定军队思想政治教育的价值取向;战争方式的演进推动着军队思想政治教育的发展;军事实践是检验军队思想政治教育的根本标准。所有这些,可以概括出军队思想政治教育与政治的本质关系——军事实践检验律。     

《德意志意识形态》中的思想政治教育意蕴及其当代启示

作为马克思主义唯物史观创立的奠基之作，《德意志意识形态》蕴蓄着丰富的思想政治教育资源，为研究无产阶级思想政治教育提供了全新的哲学视角和思想遵循。立足“意识形态”与“思想政治教育”的相关概念阐释及其辩证逻辑关系考察的理论基础，系统梳理和科学审视思想政治教育本质论构筑的内在基石、思想政治教育环境论形塑的外在动力、思想政治教育目标论指向的终极旨趣等思想政治教育的基本原理，这对新时代思想政治教育始终坚持以人民为中心的价值立场、牢牢掌握意识形态工作的主导话语权、优化创新理论灌输的教育方法具有重要现实启示和指导价值。     

深刻认识新时代军队思想政治教育的内涵实质

<正>军队思想政治教育的实质就是军队思想政治教育的根本性质,是教育区别于军队其他工作的固有的质的规定性。对新时代军队思想政治教育内涵实质的认识,从根本上决定部队教育实践的性质、层次、面貌和发展方向。在党的二十大强调如期实现建军一百年奋斗目标、加快把人民军队建成世界一流军队的战略大背景下,以习主席关于军队政治工作特别是军队思想政治教育重要论述为指导,深刻认识军队思想政治教育的实质,着重把握新时代赋予军队思想政治教育的时代蕴含,     

马克思主义需要理论及对大学生思想政治教育的启示

思想政治教育是研究人（思想及行为）的科学，而需要乃人之本性，是人的一切思想及行为的原始动因，所以，思想政治教育必须把人的需要作为研究的逻辑起点。马克思主义作为思想政治教育的理论基础，其关于人的需要的理论成为思想政治教育的理论依据。本文拟把马克思主义关于人的需要理论与大学生的现实需要的特点相结合，以期对提高大学生思想政治教育的针对性、主动性和实效性有所启示。     

关于"思想政治工作"及相关概念辨析

政治工作包括思想工作与组织工作两个主要部分.思想政治工作就是党的思想政治教育工作,它属于思想工作范畴,只是政治工作的组成部分,而非全部.思想政治工作与政治思想工作虽然侧重点不同,但本质上都是思想工作的重要组成部分.思想政治建设强调的是思想工作和组织工作中最本质的部分;这个概念的提出,体现了我们党在新时期政治工作领域的关注点,是党的理论创新成果,应当引起我们的高度重视.     

道德发展理论对思想政治教育的启示

道德发展理论是西方教育心理学的一项重要内容 ,这一理论对于思想政治教育有着借鉴和启示作用。学习和研究这一理论 ,对于思想政治工作科学化 ,对于增强思想政治教育效果都有重要意义 :借鉴道德发展理论的研究方法 ,加大思想政治教育研究的深度 ;借鉴道德发展理论揭示的客观现律 ,增强思想政治教育的效果 ;借鉴道德发展理论的培养手段 ,丰富思想政治教育的方式     

思想政治教育要突出思想性

<正>习主席指出,思想政治教育的力量在一个“真”字,要用真理说服人、用真情感染人、用真实打动人。这一重要论述,深刻揭示了思想政治教育的本质要求和基本规律。思想政治教育是在人的头脑中搞建设的一项灵魂工程,根本任务是对官兵进行科学理论灌输和正确思想引领。因此,面对新形势新特点,思想政治教育必须始终坚持“真”标准,把思想性摆在首位,与时代发展“变量”保持同步,与官兵思想“动因”保持同频,才能真正撬动心灵、触及灵魂。注重思想政治教育,把一切工作的进步建立在思想进步的基础之上,     

思想政治教育中的矛盾及其融解

在思想政治教育过程中,由于主客观方面的原因,会出现各种矛盾。矛盾是一切事物发生、发展的动力,正确认识和解决这些矛盾,能够增强思想政治教育的针对性、科学性和有效性,对于圆满实现思想政治教育目标具有重要意义。反之,对这些矛盾认识不当、解决不力,则会严重削弱思想政治教育的作用。一思想政治教育的对象主要是人。教育者与教育对象之间的关系是灌输启发与接受践行的关系。教育者是思想政治教育的主体,要通过各种教育方式使教育对象接受先进的思想理论和道德规范。教育对象则在对先进思想的接受、内化和养成的过程中,不断提高自身思想…     

Ethnicity,class, and civil war: the role of hierarchy,segmentation, and cross-cutting cleavages

Why are some countries prone to ethno-nationalist conflict, whereas others are plagued by class conflict? This is a question that has seldom been raised and rarely been examined empirically. This paper presents a social-structural theory to account for the variable incidence of these two forms of political instability. These two types of conflict result from distinct principles of group solidarity – ethnicity and class – and since each individual is simultaneously a member of an ethnic group (or many such groups) and a particular class, these two principles vary in the degree to which they are mutually exclusive or cross-cutting. The degree of economic stratification between groups and economic segmentation within them shapes the relative salience of each principle of group solidarity in any society and is associated with a characteristic form of political mobilization. In places where between-group inequalities are high, and within-group inequalities low, ethnicity should be the dominant principle of group solidarity and serve as the primary basis of group conflict. By contrast, in countries where between-group inequalities are low, and within-group inequalities high, class is more likely to serve as the dominant principle of group solidarity, and conflicts along class lines are more likely. We test these conjectures with data in over 100 countries on cross-cutting cleavages, ethnic war, and class conflict. The results are supportive of the theory, and provide evidence that how groups are stratified and segmented in societies shapes the type of civil war.     

效率、公平与公共政策

效率是社会经济发展的重要保证,而公平是衡量人类文明的重要尺度,是维护社会稳定的价值基础。效率与公平是辩证的对立统一,既有矛盾性又有统一性。公共政策的关键就是要协调与整合二者之间的关系,确保既能提高经济效率,又能实现社会公平——借助市场机制达到资源的有效配置,以提高效率;依靠社会主义制度解决财富分配不公,以彰显公平。将效率与公平完美地结合于公共政策之中,是社会主义优越性的充分体现。     

Recruiters,advertising, and navy enlistments

Regression analysis is used to estimate the effects on Navy enlistments of recruiters, advertising, unemployment and other factors. In measuring the effects of these factors on enlistments, changes in both the demand for and supply of enlistments are taken into account. Advertising is treated as a capital investment; its effect is estimated using a maximum likelihood technique that was developed for measuring the effects of capital investments. We find strong evidence that recruiters and unemployment increase enlistments. Advertising also seems to increase enlistments, but its effect is highly uncertain. The results suggest that increases in recruiting resources would have eliminated the enlistment shortfalls experienced by the Navy in FY 1978–79.     

North Korea,deterrence, and engagement

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) justifies its nuclear weapon arsenal with the concept of deterrence. It means that it will try to miniaturize and modernize its warheads and missiles. This leads to a first-use doctrine of nuclear weapons. Obama's policy of engagement does not offer a solution to the North Korean nuclear issue as yet. In the context of its policy of critical engagement with the DPRK, the European Union has three key interests: regional peace and stability, denuclearization, and human rights. The Conference on Security and Cooperation (CSCE) could be a precedent. The CSCE process was based on three “baskets”: security, economics, and humanitarian. The multilateral Trans-Pacific Partnership is a step in this regard. This article looks at three theoretical approaches: realism, liberal institutionalism, and liberal internationalism. It concludes that a political strategy to create a stable North Korean peninsula has to go beyond nuclear deterrence that is based on the realist notion of balance of power.     

Drones,spies, terrorists,and second-class citizenship in Pakistan

This essay reviews seven recent books and reports that focus upon the use of US armed drones in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). This essay synthesizes a historical account of the program, critically interrogates key arguments and evidence advanced by the authors, and draws attention the particular problems that confront those who live in the FATA and the second-class citizenship that the Pakistani state has bestowed upon them for reasons of domestic and foreign policy concerns. This review essay does not intend to be the final word on any of the ongoing policy debates. But it does hope to enable a wider audience to take part in these important deliberations.