论现行法律框架下多种形式消防队伍的发展与管理

随着社会经济的飞速发展,消防保卫任务日趋繁重,但现有消防警力严重不足,如何在建设好公安消防现役队伍的同时,建立和发展多种形式消防队伍,提高全社会的灭火救援能力,已成为保障经济建设和社会稳定的当务之急．同时也是我国消防界急需解决的重要课题。从我国发展多种形式消防队伍的理论和实践依据入手,通过进一步分析目前我国多种形式消防队伍的组织形式和发展现状,指出了我国多种形式消防队伍法制建设方面存在的问题,并结合各地的具体实践展开了对多种形式消防队伍发展的一些思考。     

论消防监督检查的原则

消防监督检查原则对于规范和制约消防监督检查权的行使具有重要作用。然而,目前消防法律对消防监督检查的原则并没有明确规定,这对于监督和制约消防监督检查权的行使,保护被检查对象的合法权益十分不利。对消防监督检查必须遵循的原则进行了探讨,提出了五项原则,即依法检查原则、比例原则、服务性原则、相对人参与原则和救济原则。     

开口电极在海水中的电场特性研究

利用稳恒电磁场理论,通过基本假设和单个电极电场计算公式的推导,计算了某一深度平面的电场值,绘制了平面分布图。接着利用相似理论进行了模型缩比实验,测量了二电极电场在某一平面上的分布值,绘制了平面分布图,进行了基本特性分析。该结果对进行船舶电场模拟和海缆断点探寻等工作,具有很好的参考价值。     

论消防法中责令停产停业处罚的实施主体

消防法中责令停产停业处罚的决定主体应当包括人民政府和公安消防机构。其中 ,重大的责令停产停业处罚的决定主体应当是地方县级以上人民政府而不是公安消防机构。这是由重大的责令停产停业处罚的严厉性、对经济和社会生活影响的重大性、受处罚组织的特殊性以及处罚实施主体权限的法定性决定的 ,也与地方人民政府的行政管理职能相适应 ,并且符合我国的立法例。责令停产停业处罚的执行主体应当是公安消防机构。     

对当前消防法制建设的思考

论述了我国当前消防法制建设中存在的问题 :无法可依 ;有法难依 ;执法不严 ;违法难究。指出消防法制建设应该注意的问题 :建立完善科学的消防法规体系 ;明确政府职责 ,切实加强领导 ;进一步加强公安消防监督队伍建设。     

线性唯象传热规律下热机内可逆热经济学研究

对符合线性唯象传热规律(q∝Δ(T-1))的热机内可逆热经济学做了进一步研究,导出了在给定条件下Novikov热机的最优利润解析式,并得到了最优利润和相应的效率同其它参数间的关系.     

特殊半鞅的强大数定律

利用特殊半鞅的收敛定理和一般形式的Kronecker引理,给出了特殊半鞅和非负特殊半鞅强大数定律的一般形式,推广和完善了已有的结果.     

飞行器的轨道优化与制导规律研究综述

飞行器的轨道优化与制导规律研究是飞行器设计的重要课题之一。轨道优化与制导规律研究是根据给定的技术指标 ,建立飞行器的运动方程 ,并选择主要设计参数 ,构造性能泛函 ,运用现代控制理论及数学理论原理求解最优参数 ,形成制导规律与相应的飞行器飞行轨道     

Becoming a disarmament champion: the Austrian crusade against nuclear weapons

ABSTRACT

The making of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) has put Austria and its involvement in nuclear disarmament in the spotlight. This study highlights several factors that led Austria to become a prominent voice in nuclear-disarmament debates. First, its involvement dovetails with the emphasis on humanitarian disarmament it has promoted since the 1990s. Second, a strong antinuclear identity pervades Austrian society. This “nuclear allergy” combines antimilitarism inherited from the Cold War and, more broadly, an aversion to nuclear power, including for energy purposes. These two considerations form the background to the increased activism of the Austrian Foreign Ministry on nuclear disarmament in international fora. But, equally, Austria’s crusade for the TPNW can be attributed to the engagement of a small team of diplomats implementing personal as well as national preferences in favor of disarmament.     

Legitimate Authority as a Jus Ad Bellum Condition: Defense of a Procedural Requirement in Just War Theory

ABSTRACT

Today, it is widely held that while authorization may be helpful in assuring that the other jus ad bellum criteria are met, legitimate authority is not itself a condition for just recourse to war. Or, if it is necessary, it is said to be a trivial requirement, as mobilization for war requires some political authorization. Those who would retain the legitimacy requirement have differing views about who the proper authority is. I argue that, reasonably understood, legitimate authorization is necessary for jus ad bellum. Considerations of agency and consent in force combine with the social contract to commit us to deferring to recognized authorities. These obligations are strengthened by the epistemic reliability and pragmatic value conferred by governing institutions and procedures limiting recourse to war. These same rationales imply that the U.N. Security Council should regulate the international use of force. I qualify that if higher authorities fail to act, other subsidiary authorities may then authorize force. However, the move to each subsequent level of authorization must be justified. Understood in this way, the requirement that wars not be fought without legitimate authorization is a non-trivial, necessary procedural jus ad bellum condition.