英语教学中自主学习能力的培养

自主学习是语言学习的关键,学生是否能够学好外语取决于自主学习能力的培养。本文阐述了自主学习的理论基础及使用价值,如何培养学生自主学习的能力,更多关注学习方法的相互作用。     

两人多冲突环境下的双矩阵对策集结模型

针对用多个双矩阵对策来描述的两人多冲突环境,首先基于局中人所受到的约束条件,构造局中人面向多冲突环境的可行策略串集合;其次以所有局中人的可行策略串集合建立新的结局空间,构造局中人在新结局空间上的支付函数,进而建立两人多冲突环境下的对策综合集结模型;最后给出了一个军事例子,该算例说明了模型的实用性.     

一类非完整系统的输出反馈控制问题研究

针对一类具有虚拟控制方向和非线性不确定项的非完整系统,研究了其输出反馈控制器的设计问题。采用状态转换技术和反推方法,设计了只依赖于输出值的输出反馈控制器。同时为了处理初值为零的情况,提出了基于第一个子系统输出值的切换控制策略,通过仿真算例说明了控制器的有效性。     

军校战士学员英语学习策略调查与分析

通过对军校战士学员英语学习策略使用的总体情况,探讨性别、所受教育程度、英语学习间断时间对英语学习策略选择的影响。结果表明,性别和所受教育程度对语言学习策略的使用没有显著影响,语言学习间断时间对语言学习策略的使用有显著影响。     

基于FBS-因果有向图模型的诊断设计建模方法研究

提出了一种基于有向图的FBS-因果模型,对FBS-因果模型的形式化描述、建模步骤进行了详细研究,对模型的有关假设、定义及其应用范围等进行了分析,总结性地给出了2种基本的故障诊断策略：序贯测试确定性故障修复法和最大后验概率候选故障源更换法。最后对抽象实例进行验证,结果表明基于有向图的FBS-因果模型的故障诊断测试是实用的,也是有效的。     

西部大开发 城市要先行——北疆铁路沿线城镇带发展战略

以北疆铁路沿线城市发展作为先导,带动全疆经济和社会的全面发展,是新疆大开发的重要战略.从区域经济发展的角度,提出了优化区域城镇带的具体方案和完善城镇带空间布局的设想和建议.     

对篮球教练员谋略的探讨

本文通过对教练员的谋略过程、谋略原则和谋略的艺术等几个方面的分析 ,为教练员在竞赛和临场指挥中正确使用谋略提供理论依据与方法     

论少数民族地区高校学报的发展之路

少数民族地区高校一般地处边远地区 ,因地域等因素的影响 ,学报的发展受到了制约。在市场经济大潮中 ,学报要发挥文化知识、科技文化信息的传承作用 ,适应时代的变革 ,与时代俱进 ,努力为少数民族地区的科技教育文化的发展服务。树立新的发展理念 ,拓宽发展思路 ,积极实践 ,走出一条有民族特色的可持续发展之路     

Enhancing Political Cohesion in NATO during the 1950s or: How it Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the (Tactical) Bomb

This article argues that the perceived need by NATO to nurture political cohesion within the Alliance during the 1950s resulted in the adoption of strategic concepts that were out-of-step with the military environment in which it was operating. It maintains that the Alliance acquiesced to American leadership on nuclear issues which led to the development of tactical nuclear capabilities at the expense of conventional war-fighting capabilities for the defence of the European Central Front. This resulted in a strategic concept that enhanced political cohesion but was militarily unviable.     

Flexible capacity strategy in an asymmetric oligopoly market with competition and demand uncertainty

This article studies flexible capacity strategy (FCS) under oligopoly competition with uncertain demand. Each firm utilizes either the FCS or inflexible capacity strategy (IFCS). Flexible firms can postpone their productions until observing the actual demand, whereas inflexible firms cannot. We formulate a new asymmetrical oligopoly model for the problem, and obtain capacity and production decisions of the firms at Nash equilibrium. It is interesting to verify that cross‐group competition determines the capacity allocation between the two groups of firms, while intergroup competition determines the market share within each group. Moreover, we show that the two strategies coexist among firms only when cost differentiation is medium. Counterintuitively, flexible firms benefit from increasing production cost when the inflexible competition intensity is sufficiently high. This is because of retreat of inflexible firms, flexibility effect, and the corresponding high price. We identify conditions under which FCS is superior than IFCS. We also demonstrate that flexible firms benefit from increasing demand uncertainty. However, when demand variance is not very large, flexible firms may be disadvantaged. We further investigate the effects of cross‐group and intergroup competition on individual performance of the firms. We show that as flexible competition intensity increases, inflexible firms are mainly affected by the cross‐group competition first and then by the intergroup competition, whereas flexible firms are mainly affected by the intergroup competition. Finally, we examine endogenous flexibility and identify its three drivers: cost parameters, cross‐group competition, and intergroup competition. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 117–138, 2017