泛系相对论与供求因缘悖憾(一)——悖论的泛系研究

泛系理论是一种侧重泛系或者广泛联系的一种多层网络型的跨学科新研究 ,探索数理·逻辑·科学思维、系统思维、哲理·辩证思维、美学·诗化思维的某些结合 (联四维 )。泛系理论专门开发了网联不同领域多种专题的泛系相对论、供求因缘悖感分析与泛系悖论。本文论述有关的理法与释例 ,包括数理工医文社史哲许多相对性、悖论与供求因缘悖憾的泛系理悟 ,可以简化强化为 :“泛系悖论 =泛系相对论 +泛系供求论”。具体内容涉及 :泛系理论框架 784e ,泛系相对论·泛系辩证·泛系悖论的 8题 16模式百例 2 9说。     

The Environment as a Factor in Small Wars*

This research paper analyzes the relationship between small wars, insurgency, and the natural environment. Existing literature and data are organized into four behavioral patterns: the resource-based wars accounts for the fight over natural resources; the warfare ecology paradigm refers to non-premeditated damage in preparation for as well as during and after conflicts; the environment as a target discusses intended attacks on the ecosystem; and the insurgency–climate intersection pattern denotes a deviation in climate change that increases the frequency of intergroup violence. The main premise is that small wars emerge when the ecosystem becomes a political asset.     

Rose-tinted lenses: how American functionalist strategy inhibits our appreciation of complex conflicts

Strategists and military professionals have previously questioned many of the methodological (theoretical underpinnings, the principles, and rules applied by the discipline) decisions associated with American military strategy, but the direction this essay takes is above and beyond the common methodological rivalries in how we pursue strategic desired future states. To get beyond methodological disputes entirely, we must consider thinking about our thinking as an organization on American strategy. Thus, this article hovers between philosophies, organizational theory, as well as our usually unquestioned belief in something called “strategy”. Questioning things about our basic understanding of the world tends to trigger strong organizational defense mechanisms, for good reason. Critical reflection at deep levels puts our worldview, and our role within it at stake. Nonetheless, as strategic disappointment emerges over multiple complex conflict developments, even the most cherished and guarded choices on how the world ought to work are ripe for critical inquiry. This essay examines the limited single strategic paradigm of the US defense industry and how the latest American National Security Strategy and Army Future Operating Concept (Win in a Complex World through 2030) presents a flawed strategic position. This essay presents valid alternative strategies that operate within different paradigmatic constructs.     

卡尔曼滤波算法的几何解释

对低维卡尔曼滤波算法作了几何解释 ,这种解释对卡尔曼滤波有一种直观的理解 ,使人们对卡尔曼滤波有更本质的认识。