排序方式: 共有81条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
本文对电力系统暂态稳定中的主要随机因素作出合理的假定后,提出了基于临界切除时间的暂态稳定性概率分析方法。这种方法计及电力系统中系统参数的随机性,计算例题表明了其可行性。 相似文献
2.
考虑二相负荷大小、功率因数变化,分析了YN/联结平衡变压器用于铁道牵引电站时一次侧的负序和谐波电流的变化规律。通过与YN/△接线变压器比较,说明YN/联结平衡变压器在减小电网负序和谐波电流方面具有很大优势。在牵引电站中使用该变压器能显著地提高牵引供电系统的技术和经济性能。 相似文献
3.
4.
通过分析开关电源产生EMI信号的原因,叙述了电磁兼容的重要性,针对开关电源中EMI信号的特点,重点介绍了几种抑制EMI信号的方法和措施 相似文献
5.
6.
Mingjiang Li 《战略研究杂志》2015,38(3):359-382
AbstractChina has a strong interest in pursuing a smart power strategy towards Southeast Asia and has worked laboriously to engage with regional countries economically, socially, and politically. But China has been only partially successful in achieving its goals in the region. This paper argues that China’s security policy towards Southeast Asia significantly contradicts many other objectives that Beijing wishes to accomplish. Given the deep-seated, narrowly-defined national interests of the Chinese military in the South China Sea disputes, it is likely that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will continue to pose the main obstacle to the effective implementation of a Chinese smart strategy in Southeast Asia. 相似文献
7.
Evan N. Resnick 《战略研究杂志》2015,38(3):383-409
AbstractThis paper employs the concept of smart power to construct an analytical framework for assessing wartime alliance management. It makes two arguments. First, wartime sources of soft power differ from those obtaining during peacetime. Second, the coerciveness with which an alliance leader wields hard power towards actual or prospective allies should vary inversely with the amount of soft power it possesses. The smart power framework illuminates three types of alliance management failure. The paper’s key contentions are illustrated with examples furnished from the record of US alliance leadership since World War II. 相似文献
8.
9.
多载频相位编码信号(MCPC)是近年来备受关注的一种新体制宽带雷达信号,其灵活的信号结构使其具备性能均衡、可调的特点,与此同时对参数设计的要求也相应提高.现有设计方法难以在模糊图和包络控制方面同时取得令人满意的性能,且大多只研究了载频数量较少的情况.针对此问题提出了一种编码序列随机移位的MCPC信号,具备理想的图钉状模... 相似文献
10.
Michael Beckley 《战略研究杂志》2013,36(1):43-79
Abstract What makes some states more militarily powerful than others? A growing body of research suggests that certain ‘non-material’ factors significantly affect a country's ability to translate resources into fighting power. In particular, recent studies claim that democracy, Western culture, high levels of human capital, and amicable civil-military relations enhance military effectiveness. If these studies are correct, then military power is not solely or even primarily determined by material resources, and a large chunk of international relations scholarship has been based on a flawed metric. The major finding of this article, however, suggests that this is not the case. In hundreds of battles between 1898 and 1987, the more economically developed side consistently outfought the poorer side on a soldier-for-soldier basis. This is not surprising. What is surprising is that many of the non-material factors posited to affect military capability seem to be irrelevant: when economic development is taken into account, culture and human capital become insignificant and democracy actually seems to degrade warfighting capability. In short, the conventional military dominance of Western democracies stems from superior economic development, not societal pathologies or political institutions. Therefore, a conception of military power that takes into account both the quantity of a state's resources and its level of economic development provides a sound basis for defense planning and international relations scholarship. 相似文献